One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Will having less children or no children at all help an environment???
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 20, 2019 20:38:07   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Dont you think having healthy families will actually help an environment???......I think President Trump should have his Paid Family Leave front and center for his ree******n campaign..Then i am sure that suburban moms and women in general will give him thumbs up and will help to reelect him in 2020!!! What do you guys think???

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 20:40:03   #
Kevyn
 
proud republican wrote:
Dont you think having healthy families will actually help an environment???......I think President Trump should have his Paid Family Leave front and center for his ree******n campaign..Then i am sure that suburban moms and women in general will give him thumbs up and will help to reelect him in 2020!!! What do you guys think???


Paid family leave is a socialist construct and burdensome expensive regulation on industry.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 20:46:51   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Here is Climate Manifesto......

http://climatemanifesto.com/

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 20:51:51   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Kevyn wrote:
Paid family leave is a socialist construct and burdensome expensive regulation on industry.


So what you are saying Kevyn it is burdensome to give women who are pregnant and about to have kids some time off with pay???..Or taking some time off to take care of ailing spouse or parent or child with pay is burdensome too???...I call it being human....What a concept!!!!

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 20:59:12   #
Kevyn
 
proud republican wrote:
So what you are saying Kevyn it is burdensome to give women who are pregnant and about to have kids some time off with pay???..Or taking some time off to take care of ailing spouse or parent or child with pay is burdensome too???...I call it being human....What a concept!!!!
So what you are saying Kevyn it is burdensome to ... (show quote)


What I am trying to point out things like mandatory paid family leave are progressive ideas that conservatives have fought tooth and nail.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 21:01:44   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I am trying to point out things like mandatory paid family leave are progressive ideas that conservatives have fought tooth and nail.


Actually Ivanka was all for it!!!

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 21:22:40   #
dongreen76
 
proud republican wrote:
Dont you think having healthy families will actually help an environment???......I think President Trump should have his Paid Family Leave front and center for his ree******n campaign..Then i am sure that suburban moms and women in general will give him thumbs up and will help to reelect him in 2020!!! What do you guys think???


Yes ,having less children will help the environment `Proud Incurry.Human beings, and yes even animals when inhaling they extract good clean oxygen from the environment,while exhaling they emit toxic carbon dioxide back into the environment.Now since there exist a problem with the environment -globing warming- and a lot of people think it is do to the fact toxic pollutants are being emitted into the air through industry,and these same toxic emission are ascending into higher stages of the atmosphere and there they remain stagnant, retaining heat, there by raising the earths atmospheric temperature -of course more human beings extracting oxygen,and emitting toxic carbon dioxide ,just as industry does would logically not be a helpful solution to the environmental problem.

P.S.I believe a g****l w*****g problem exist,however, I don't believe it is man made.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 21:27:55   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Yes ,having less children will help the environment `Proud Incurry.Human beings, and yes even animals when inhaling they extract good clean oxygen from the environment,while exhaling they emit toxic carbon dioxide back into it.Now since having a problem with the environment -globing warming- and a lot of people think it is do to the fact toxic pollutants are being emitted into the air, through industry,and these same toxic emission are ascending into higher stages of the atmosphere and there they remain stagnant, retaining heat there by raising the earths atmospheric temperature of course more human beings extracting oxygen,and emitting toxic carbon dioxide just as industry does would logically not be a helpful solution to the environmental problem.

P.S.I believe a g****l w*****g problem exist,however, I don't believe it is man made.
Yes ,having less children will help the environmen... (show quote)


Just out of curiosity...What the hell is Incurry????

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 21:40:16   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
What a dilemma. PR makes a case for nurturing children, new Mons, sick and injured, etc. It is a nice gesture when a company can extend some help in this regard. But they are a business set up to produce and sell a product and not a social service agency. It is not an issue government should butt in on.

Then I see Kevyn actually making sense. Did someone sneak into his mommies basement and get hold of his computer. He actually was making the case of the Conservatives and Republicans against the Socialist?Democrat/Left. Well done. For once. Welcome to the Conservative Capitalist side.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 21:45:25   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Sanders wants asylum refugees to include Climate refugees from all over the world!!!!

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/09/19/sanders-i-would-be-positively-disposed-to-expanding-asylum-to-include-climate-refugees/

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 21:46:13   #
Kevyn
 
proud republican wrote:
Actually Ivanka was all for it!!!


And you can see how it became a priority over the obscene tax giveaway to the uber rich and multinationals, give me a break it is simply lip service.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 21:56:49   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
Kevyn said in two different posts:

Paid family leave is a socialist construct and burdensome expensive regulation on industry.

What I am trying to point out things like mandatory paid family leave are progressive ideas that conservatives have fought tooth and nail.

Ahh, there is the Kevyn we know. So now I can correct his usual BS. Paid family leave is a Progressive movement bad idea, but not a progressive idea.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 22:00:28   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I am trying to point out things like mandatory paid family leave are progressive ideas that conservatives have fought tooth and nail.


What we fight tooth and nail against is the atheistic belief that if mankind were abolished the balance of "nature" would be restored. All natural resources have but one purpose and that is to provide for and to serve humanity. Be good stewards? Or course. "Go forth and multiply?" Unquestionably! Does God provide for that which He creates? He does, but mankind too often interfers! If fact, some actually believe they have power to control the climate!

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 22:05:50   #
Lonewolf
 
We need all the kids we can possibly have woman should be bred like cattle ,we need these people for Our Endless Wars

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 22:27:59   #
dongreen76
 
proud republican wrote:
Just out of curiosity...What the hell is Incurry????


Judging by your user profile photograph, you look to be of negro-centricity.I didn't say Afrocentric, because you implied you were of Russian descent,therefore you cannot be an Afro-American;but still you look to be of the black persuasion.You, by your own admission are a Republican. It is a well known criticizism of black people that are Republicans, that they are in congruence with the Republican party,,- whom are known as the party that harbor those political philosophies that are r****t and anti b****s e******y ,and very existence.If you were an intelligent woman [ evidently, and judging by your post you're not] you should have surmised what the word`Incurry` means,it is a satirical variation of the word Incurrer.You being a black Republican should have encountered that criticizism numerous times.It is the standard criticizism for one such as you.An Incurer is -to be more coloquial- is an -Uncle Tom.To further elaborate,(specifically for you) an uncle Tom is one whom ingratiates for profit, opposing adversaries that the uncle Tom has aligned himself in lieu of siding with ITS' own kind.It historically has been known to be stupid.It pretty much does not have a comprehension of what it is doing.It does not fathom, that it is tantamount to a -T*****R-.There is not a race,creed,or color,or nationality that respects or likes it.
`

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.