I agree and think the Mayors and Governors should be arrested. They won't though, it would be adhering to the rule of law while they are aiding and abetting murders and rapists.
Does anyone here on OPP think that this is perhaps r****t or anti I*****L I*******T? Does anyone here think that this is ABSOLUTELY THE RIGHT THING TO DO , when a Sanctuary city or municipality FAILS TO UPHOLD THE RULE OF LAW? I'm not going to do the "WHAT IF THIS WAS YOUR FAMILY MEMBER" Type of thing! Doesn't common sense dictate that those that were responsible for allowing these criminals to be let free back into the various sanctuary communities be arrested for not only not following their oaths of office to protect and defend their communities but to be also convicted of the various horrendous crimes the same as if a driver of a criminal gang that ends up in the murder of innocents also be charged with the same murder? I am so GD sick and tired of those that due to their personal sense of BS MORALITY THINK THAT THEY ARE NOT CULPABLE OF THE SAME DAMN CRIMES AS THOSE THEY HAVE RELEASED INTO the various sanctuary communities! As far as I'm concerned those that adhere to to the release of I*****l i*******ts that go on to commit the all to well know horrendous crimes should be arrested for the same crimes of those that they have been trying to protec! Semper Fi Mike
Does anyone here on OPP think that this is perhaps... (show quote)
This is just a continuation of Obama’s policies of enforcement se******n. If you don’t like the law, ignore it and prosecute people who obey it. Thank God that Arab criminal, Obama, is gone.
This is just a continuation of Obama’s policies of enforcement se******n. If you don’t like the law, ignore it and prosecute people who obey it. Thank God that Arab criminal, Obama, is gone.
Does anyone here on OPP think that this is perhaps r****t or anti I*****L I*******T? Does anyone here think that this is ABSOLUTELY THE RIGHT THING TO DO , when a Sanctuary city or municipality FAILS TO UPHOLD THE RULE OF LAW? I'm not going to do the "WHAT IF THIS WAS YOUR FAMILY MEMBER" Type of thing! Doesn't common sense dictate that those that were responsible for allowing these criminals to be let free back into the various sanctuary communities be arrested for not only not following their oaths of office to protect and defend their communities but to be also convicted of the various horrendous crimes the same as if a driver of a criminal gang that ends up in the murder of innocents also be charged with the same murder? I am so GD sick and tired of those that due to their personal sense of BS MORALITY THINK THAT THEY ARE NOT CULPABLE OF THE SAME DAMN CRIMES AS THOSE THEY HAVE RELEASED INTO the various sanctuary communities! As far as I'm concerned those that adhere to to the release of I*****l i*******ts that go on to commit the all to well know horrendous crimes should be arrested for the same crimes of those that they have been trying to protec! Semper Fi Mike
This amounts to the same thing as the democrats wanting to blame the gun for mass k*****gs instead of instead of blaming the i***t that used the gun to cause the mass k*****gs. I agree that all involved with forming a sanctuary city and the people that allowed the i*****l i*******ts to go free should be arrested for the same crimes as the person that they released as they allowed the mayhem to happen. Great Post
If you put a few of them in jail or how about a public caning, the rest would stop. They only do it because they know they won't be punished.
I agree and think the Mayors and Governors should be arrested. They won't though, it would be adhering to the rule of law while they are aiding and abetting murders and rapists.
Agree with you. The elephant in the bathroom is Democrat V**e Whoring. As LBJ is quoted, "We'll have them n****rs v****g Democrat for the next 200 years". It's all about the v**es, Esmeralda! If I can get re-elected by protecting criminal i******s in this city, I don't really CARE how the native-born and naturalized people suffer. Conservative OR Liberal, Republican OR Democrat. "Sanctuary" States and Cities NEED to suffer for abetting, harboring and enabling invading trespassers. Sure....when someone is suffering (about 1%), you want to help. But the REAL reason Latino I******s want to come here is the HUGE WELFARE BUSINESS! That, and building Islam in the U.S. I just dont GET it! Millennials and "X-ers" want and expect CHANGE. But for what and TO what? Argentina? Venezuela? Laos? No matter. When will young and "Yellow-Dog" Democrats realize that THIS is better than ANYWHERE else? Name a country in the WORLD where citizens have it better. Then name the countries where WALLS define their nation. Get it?
Well, not to be radical (I'll leave that up to your AOC and the "Squat"), but if you aid and abet murdering future citizens of the United States? What if your party WANTS i******s to violate our national boundaries, take "public assistance" and never do anything to contribute to it, move to take away my God-given and Constitutionally affirmed and protected rights? Socialism is antithetical to a democratic republic, and the Democrat Party avows socialism. Any more questions? I have many more answers.
Well, not to be radical (I'll leave that up to your AOC and the "Squat"), but if you aid and abet murdering future citizens of the United States? What if your party WANTS i******s to violate our national boundaries, take "public assistance" and never do anything to contribute to it, move to take away my God-given and Constitutionally affirmed and protected rights? Socialism is antithetical to a democratic republic, and the Democrat Party avows socialism. Any more questions? I have many more answers.
Well, not to be radical (I'll leave that up to you... (show quote)
Well, not to be radical (I'll leave that up to your AOC and the "Squat"), but if you aid and abet murdering future citizens of the United States? What if your party WANTS i******s to violate our national boundaries, take "public assistance" and never do anything to contribute to it, move to take away my God-given and Constitutionally affirmed and protected rights? Socialism is antithetical to a democratic republic, and the Democrat Party avows socialism. Any more questions? I have many more answers.
Well, not to be radical (I'll leave that up to you... (show quote)