Gun buy back.
nwtk2007 wrote:
So first of all, how can gov buy back what they never had? LOL! It's called confiscation.
But mainly, the serial k**lers I know have said that they probably won't participate in that. Just say'in!
This particular "liberal" ain't playing that crap, just saying. I paid $2500 for a super accurate Les Baer custom. I support the reasonable end of gun laws, but reject forced confiscation. I think that we will have background checks, mental health f**gs, red f**g, domestic violence as a disqualifier, magazine size restrictions, possibly bans on new assault style rifles, but that anything further turns too many people away from supporting it.
You never know who's a serial k**ler do you? Lol
F.D.R. wrote:
My simple reply: NOT FOR SALE !
Mine is what assault rifle, it was stolen
Larai wrote:
Yep!... Kinda like locks on doors..only keep honest people honest.. if a crook wants to break in to your house...they'd find a way... instead of making New laws, maybe much like immigration, enforce the laws already on the books... but even those laws are an infringement.. just sayin!
That's rich.. the gov't "buying back" our guns... with OUR money!..
I've never used my locks. Playing with fire? You can't get within 20 feet of the door back or front, several tripwires will get you. A few burglars or wannabes learned that the hard way. Then if you did get past the first line snares are waiting. There are three other lines. I sleep like a baby while my wife snores.
I still like the Liberals statement that an AR 15 is a military assault rifle! That's funny in Viet Nam it was an M 16 or a soviet made AK 47. Lets see the difference, an AR 15s ONLY fire semi automatically ONLY while M 16s and AK 47s can shoot semi automatically or Automatically. I love how the liberals change the definition of an assault weapon to fit their native.
Unfortunately most of the unformed, uncaring or STUPID don't realize that autos, pressure cooker bombs, fertilizer bombs, plastic explosive (PE) ETC, can and will be used again if the liberals take away long guns and pistols. Maybe weather they get our weapons or not. I worked with a very smart older gentlemen many years ago (in the 1990s) who was an organic chemist (PhD). He was in his 60s then, and told me at that time that the real attack would be from an air or water introduced chemical or biological agent. He stated by the time the CDC figures out what is happening and what the agent or v***s is, half the U.S. population will be infected or dead and by the time they (the government) creates an antidote (if they can) the rest of us will be infected or dead. Guns aren't the problem people are!
NOTE: The second amendment was created by our founders fathers so the people can protect themselves from the government. Read History!!!!!
nwtk2007 wrote:
So first of all, how can gov buy back what they never had? LOL! It's called confiscation.
But mainly, the serial k**lers I know have said that they probably won't participate in that. Just say'in!
Should Democrats &/or liberals still be allowed to own guns?
Are there any conservatives out their robbing liquor stores?
Maybe Democrats should be disarmed.
eagleye13 wrote:
Should Democrats &/or liberals still be allowed to own guns?
Are there any conservatives out their robbing liquor stores?
Maybe Democrats should be disarmed.
Just the California ones!
RickyDCUSMC wrote:
I still like the Liberals statement that an AR 15 is a military assault rifle! That's funny in Viet Nam it was an M 16 or a soviet made AK 47. Lets see the difference, an AR 15s ONLY fire semi automatically ONLY while M 16s and AK 47s can shoot semi automatically or Automatically. I love how the liberals change the definition of an assault weapon to fit their native.
Unfortunately most of the unformed, uncaring or STUPID don't realize that autos, pressure cooker bombs, fertilizer bombs, plastic explosive (PE) ETC, can and will be used again if the liberals take away long guns and pistols. Maybe weather they get our weapons or not. I worked with a very smart older gentlemen many years ago (in the 1990s) who was an organic chemist (PhD). He was in his 60s then, and told me at that time that the real attack would be from an air or water introduced chemical or biological agent. He stated by the time the CDC figures out what is happening and what the agent or v***s is, half the U.S. population will be infected or dead and by the time they (the government) creates an antidote (if they can) the rest of us will be infected or dead. Guns aren't the problem people are!
NOTE: The second amendment was created by our founders fathers so the people can protect themselves from the government. Read History!!!!!
I still like the Liberals statement that an AR 15 ... (
show quote)
"Guns aren't the problem people are!"
Sooooo!
Will the government disarm?
eagleye13 wrote:
Should Democrats &/or liberals still be allowed to own guns?
Are there any conservatives out their robbing liquor stores?
Maybe Democrats should be disarmed.
Trying to tag people for confiscation based on politics is kind of infantile so I am assuming you are being facetious. I agree with woodguru generally on this topic. The genie is out of the gun bottle in America
so holding up other countries gun laws as an example to follow is nonsense. There will never be an absolute solution to gun violence but there is a great deal that could be done with trigger lock and storage, red f**g laws, gun registration and background checks. The NRA could show some leadership but since they have become an arm of a political party they are effectively emasculated as a sober, senior influencer on this matter so proper established gun clubs could and should step up. In any event we could do better than we are. A lot of people enjoy safe gun ownership and never commit a crime but this endless analysis of gun mentality by some on the left is pointless and unnecessarily pours gasoline on the fire. Beto O'Rourke
just got his last 5 seconds of fame by spooking the herd about coming for your AK. As a last ditch attempt
to get attention for his failed P**********l campaign he will be remembered as someone who uniquely lacked the temperance and vision to be anything more than a yappy political lightweight who would be best suited to run for dogcatcher. (Disappointing because he sounded interesting out of the gate.)
eden wrote:
Trying to tag people for confiscation based on politics is kind of infantile so I am assuming you are being facetious. I agree with woodguru generally on this topic. The genie is out of the gun bottle in America
so holding up other countries gun laws as an example to follow is nonsense. There will never be an absolute solution to gun violence but there is a great deal that could be done with trigger lock and storage, red f**g laws, gun registration and background checks. The NRA could show some leadership but since they have become an arm of a political party they are effectively emasculated as a sober, senior influencer on this matter so proper established gun clubs could and should step up. In any event we could do better than we are. A lot of people enjoy safe gun ownership and never commit a crime but this endless analysis of gun mentality by some on the left is pointless and unnecessarily pours gasoline on the fire. Beto O'Rourke
just got his last 5 seconds of fame by spooking the herd about coming for your AK. As a last ditch attempt
to get attention for his failed P**********l campaign he will be remembered as someone who uniquely lacked the temperance and vision to be anything more than a yappy political lightweight who would be best suited to run for dogcatcher. (Disappointing because he sounded interesting out of the gate.)
Trying to tag people for confiscation based on pol... (
show quote)
"Trying to tag people for confiscation based on politics is kind of infantile so I am assuming you are being facetious." - eden
Os course!
"Beto O'Rourke
just got his last 5 seconds of fame by spooking the herd about coming for your AK. As a last ditch attempt
to get attention for his failed P**********l campaign he will be remembered as someone who uniquely lacked the temperance and vision to be anything more than a yappy political lightweight who would be best suited to run for dogcatcher." - eden
Very well stated.
BTW;dogs would not deserve Beto as dog catcher.
He is a pig.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.