If trump can put a Saudi in charge why not a mexcan
Sep 17, 2019 06:23:23 #
America 1
Loc: South Miami
Jlw wrote:
Yesterday Trump was Putin's b***h
Lone is President Trump's b***h.
Sep 17, 2019 06:37:11 #
Sep 17, 2019 11:17:33 #
Lonewolf wrote:
If Trump can delrgate athority like he did by putting a Saudi dictator in charge of our military
Why not take it one step farther and put Mexico in charge of our border patrol
Why not take it one step farther and put Mexico in charge of our border patrol
Simple, he don’t want to.
Sep 17, 2019 16:19:55 #
son of witless wrote:
You mean like Obama did ?
Yep. I don't think we need a wolf in the henhouse.
Sep 17, 2019 18:03:38 #
tactful wrote:
This may be true. Rump may not have. Pooty simply pulled a few strings, the same with the Taliban meet he set up only smiley knew better, this sortie he was on his own. Now there's a treason alarm going off w/ passengers waiting to get on the bus.waz a matter with ewe?
Watch the Story play out before bad exercises: jumping to conclusions.
Watch the Story play out before bad exercises: jumping to conclusions.
Treason on who's part ?
Sep 17, 2019 19:50:54 #
zillaorange wrote:
Treason on who's part ?
Who is being accused of wanting to make our military mercenaries, fighting for another country with our troops?
Sep 17, 2019 20:49:30 #
tactful wrote:
Who is being accused of wanting to make our military mercenaries, fighting for another country with our troops?
Kennedy & his underling sent lots of people ton viet nam !!! Guess they're about even !
Sep 17, 2019 21:11:19 #
zillaorange wrote:
Kennedy & his underling sent lots of people ton viet nam !!! Guess they're about even !
did they fight for another country and let said country tell our military what ,when who to attack ? howz that even? smells like mean teen spirit to me. Or? Russia calling( unheard of then,heard of now?). and we paid the price dearly. different era,different politics,when right was and wrong was. it still didn't make anything "right "
Sep 17, 2019 21:50:04 #
America 1
Loc: South Miami
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Yep. I don't think we need a wolf in the henhouse.
Why not, the hens could easily outsmart him.
Sep 18, 2019 08:30:21 #
tactful wrote:
did they fight for another country and let said country tell our military what ,when who to attack ? howz that even? smells like mean teen spirit to me. Or? Russia calling( unheard of then,heard of now?). and we paid the price dearly. different era,different politics,when right was and wrong was. it still didn't make anything "right "
UUUUHHHHHHH They fought for S Viet Nam !!!
Sep 18, 2019 12:09:17 #
zillaorange wrote:
UUUUHHHHHHH They fought for S Viet Nam !!!
true,to free them. not being in wait to or need to be told what to do or await instructions on who to attack ?
how is it our military is being run by someone who has no idea of the mechanics but willing to let others try and who will not listen to anyone that does? ,curious conundrum,off topic here, but still one or is there?
Sep 18, 2019 12:45:42 #
tactful wrote:
There's that word again - "accused". Don't y'all ever get tired of false accusations? President Trump did not "make our military mercenaries", he did not turn them over to the Saudis to do wh**ever they wanted, he simply told the Saudis we would "would certainly help them" if they need us. Who is being accused of wanting to make our military mercenaries, fighting for another country with our troops?
Saudi Arabia appears to be line with President Trump’s aversion to taking military action against Iran and instead is pushing for an international coalition to assist in defending oil infrastructure from future attacks.
Sep 18, 2019 13:06:05 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
There's that word again - "accused". Don... (show quote)
only when accusations are and can be proven false are they tiring ,it's getting dicey proving most wrong these days if we're to believe our eyes and ears. not every/anything only found online.
Sep 18, 2019 15:43:02 #
tactful wrote:
true,to free them. not being in wait to or need to be told what to do or await instructions on who to attack ?
how is it our military is being run by someone who has no idea of the mechanics but willing to let others try and who will not listen to anyone that does? ,curious conundrum,off topic here, but still one or is there?
how is it our military is being run by someone who has no idea of the mechanics but willing to let others try and who will not listen to anyone that does? ,curious conundrum,off topic here, but still one or is there?
To begin with, Trump is in a holding pattern. He said he'd wait for definite conformation that Iran was responsible. It seems this has been confirmed, but still Trump is waiting. He sent Pompaeo to gather the details. As of yet there's been no indication he's send any more troops or apparently ramping up any military action. By the way, where did you hear U. S. troops would be under command of the Saudi regime ?
Sep 18, 2019 21:00:44 #
zillaorange wrote:
To begin with, Trump is in a holding pattern. He said he'd wait for definite conformation that Iran was responsible. It seems this has been confirmed, but still Trump is waiting. He sent Pompaeo to gather the details. As of yet there's been no indication he's send any more troops or apparently ramping up any military action. By the way, where did you hear U. S. troops would be under command of the Saudi regime ?
when the splash happened it made waves across intel communities all over recording events as they happened ,unsure where other info comes from in the rest but suspect we may have similar sources.ours have not proven out yours as of yet,most still holding their breath,except radical on both sides as per normal. its a waiting game either way.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.