Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Voice of Reason wrote:
Questions nobody asks:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Questions nobody asks: br br Why should straight ... (
show quote)
All great questions!!!...Wonder if our l*****t friends on OPP would answer them at all!!!
Voice of Reason wrote:
Questions nobody asks:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Questions nobody asks: br br Why should straight ... (
show quote)
The lack of logic that is the norm for the "progressives" is really frightening. Sometime I wonder how they can be employed in any line of work past garbage collector but apparently many are employed in high income fields.
proud republican wrote:
All great questions!!!...Wonder if our l*****t friends on OPP would answer them at all!!!
I suspect that, if there are any answers at all from our l*****ts, they will consist of 'R****T!', 'Homophobe!', you know...the usual.
no propaganda please wrote:
The lack of logic that is the norm for the "progressives" is really frightening. Sometime I wonder how they can be employed in any line of work past garbage collector but apparently many are employed in high income fields.
I'm guessing most of those high income fields are either in govt. or govt. funded.
Voice of Reason wrote:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Why should straight people go to great lengths to ... (
show quote)
1. Protected status, for their v**e, and to keep a wedge between gays and everyone else.
2. Hypocrisy, a necessary trait for l*****ts.
3. Doesn't fit the propaganda narrative, as it would mean that there may have been some white people, somewhere in our history, who weren't r****ts. Besides, the young men who gave their lives to free the s***es were Republicans, and therefore expendable in the left's Zinnful version of American History -- after all, it
was Democrats from whom they were freeing the s***es.
4. To sow still more confusion and d******eness in our society.
As long as there's a plentiful pool of flaky neurotics, gullible simpletons, useful i***ts, dupes, dumbjohns and corrupt Democrat politicians to use as conduits for their insane agendas, the far left will never let up.
Voice of Reason wrote:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Why should straight people go to great lengths to ... (
show quote)
It's all about alternative facts...................................or alternate universes, take your pick.
Voice of Reason wrote:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Why should straight people go to great lengths to ... (
show quote)
Good questions, and the answer is........a bunch of lying hypocrites.
Seth wrote:
1. Protected status, for their v**e, and to keep a wedge between gays and everyone else.
Isn't it amazing how the gays have become the bullys and yet still maintain their victimhood status?
Seth wrote:
2. Hypocrisy, a necessary trait for l*****ts.
True. Their hypocrisy is exceeded only by their greed.
Seth wrote:
3. Doesn't fit the propaganda narrative, as it would mean that there may have been some white people, somewhere in our history, who weren't r****ts. Besides, the young men who gave their lives to free the s***es were Republicans, and therefore expendable in the left's Zinnful version of American History -- after all, it was Democrats from whom they were freeing the s***es.
True again. I forget who said it after Trump defeated Hillary, but it's absolutely correct..."the Dems haven't been this angry since we took away their s***es."
Seth wrote:
4. To sow still more confusion and d******eness in our society.
Actually, it took me a long time to figure this one out. You're partially correct, but I think the main reason is to sow confusion and dissatisfaction among youngsters in school. This will help the l*****t agenda of graduating students with no knowledge or abilities but with a strong convition that society owes them everything they want. IOW - Democrat v**ers.
Seth wrote:
As long as there's a plentiful pool of flaky neurotics, gullible simpletons, useful i***ts, dupes, dumbjohns and corrupt Democrat politicians to use as conduits for their insane agendas, the far left will never let up.
And the l*****ts are using what used to be the educational system to ensure that pool never dries up.
Voice of Reason wrote:
Why should straight people go to great lengths to avoid annoying gays when gays hold 'p***e' marches for the sole purpose of annoying straights?
If the Clintons think government is the answer to problems, then why is their foundation tax-exempt?
Why do l*****ts condemn white folks for s***ery but never praise the white folks who died fighting to free s***es they'd never even met?
Why do l*****ts who 'believe in science' insist there is no difference between men and women while claiming there are more than 50 g****rs?
Why should straight people go to great lengths to ... (
show quote)
Another question or talking point you will NEVER hear is the fbi found 40,000 other Clinton emails, not the 33,000 ones that everyone knows about.Will anything happen with those?They are in the nsa.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.