One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Do you think we are alone??
Page <<first <prev 11 of 19 next> last>>
Sep 8, 2019 22:21:47   #
kemmer
 
Silent Hammer wrote:
Why is it that on "Ancient Aliens" the "supposes" always start with "What if..." Stan Lee has made a FORTUNE on fantasy. It's important to know the difference.

I forced myself to watch “Ancient Aliens” a couple of nights on the McHistory channel.
What an astoundingly humongous pile of horses**t. How do those people keep straight faces?

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 23:09:23   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
kemmer wrote:
Theories do not exist without considerable evidence to support them.


Wrong, many theories spring from the imagination.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 00:42:11   #
kemmer
 
bilordinary wrote:
Wrong, many theories spring from the imagination.

We're not talking about mythology.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2019 01:44:14   #
Iliamna1
 
kemmer wrote:
We're not talking about mythology.


And neither are we.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 03:57:38   #
Big dog
 
proud republican wrote:
Do you believe there is life on other planets???...Our Universe is sooooo vast,do you think we are alone???


I watched “ the Privaledged Planet as I said I would. Really good. Pretty much explains that there Is a “CREATOR “.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 10:08:34   #
kemmer
 
Big dog wrote:
I watched “ the Privaledged Planet as I said I would. Really good. Pretty much explains that there Is a “CREATOR “.

Where did you see it, on the McHistory channel?

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 11:13:57   #
Carol Kelly
 
proud republican wrote:
I wonder if i***ts will still storm area 51!!!!!


I***ts being i***ts, one never knows.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2019 17:09:57   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
I***ts being i***ts, one never knows.


So true!!!

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 22:29:59   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
WHAT? Ever hear of the flat earth theory? Considerable evidence my a$$. A theory is nothing more than a conjecture or a supposition.

In science (real science, not l*****t pseudo-science), scientists posit theories, then other scientists try to refute those theories. If the theories cannot be easily refuted, such as evolution or relativity, then they become accepted theories. If they can be proven false, such as the flat earth theory, they are replaced with theories that fit known facts.


What exactly are you calling l*****t pseudo-science?

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 22:42:58   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Big dog wrote:
I watched “ the Privaledged Planet as I said I would. Really good. Pretty much explains that there Is a “CREATOR “.

I've always been able to find the scientific holes in the efforts people make to validate the biblical claims.

Intelligent Design in my opinion is an arrangement of partial models, big words and a heavy reliance on the lack of imagination in the audience - by that I mean their inability to fathom the expanse of time and space that allows the improbable. They feel more comfortable with something closer to the human capacity, as if the universe was intentionally baked like a cake in 30 minutes.

I'll watch the Privileged Planet though - I haven't seen it yet.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 22:56:19   #
Rose42
 
straightUp wrote:
I've always been able to find the scientific holes in the efforts people make to validate the biblical claims.

Intelligent Design in my opinion is an arrangement of partial models, big words and a heavy reliance on the lack of imagination in the audience - by that I mean their inability to fathom the expanse of time and space that allows the improbable. They feel more comfortable with something closer to the human capacity, as if the universe was intentionally baked like a cake in 30 minutes.

I'll watch the Privileged Planet though - I haven't seen it yet.
I've always been able to find the scientific holes... (show quote)


Ironically it takes a much greater leap of faith to believe something was created from nothing and all of life and its complexities evolved from it. Science has guesses based on what they think they know, no more.

Reply
 
 
Sep 10, 2019 07:43:21   #
Iliamna1
 
Rose42 wrote:
Ironically it takes a much greater leap of faith to believe something was created from nothing and all of life and its complexities evolved from it. Science has guesses based on what they think they know, no more.


So true. For the l*****ts and unbelievers, time = god. Given a few billion years. nearly anything can happen.
Except it can't. Life and creation are so obviously driven by intelligent design. No accidents and no mutations can begin to explain what is other than the simple fact that In the beginning, God created.

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 09:35:12   #
moldyoldy
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
So true. For the l*****ts and unbelievers, time = god. Given a few billion years. nearly anything can happen.
Except it can't. Life and creation are so obviously driven by intelligent design. No accidents and no mutations can begin to explain what is other than the simple fact that In the beginning, God created.
e

God created, and then aliens altered. Then suddenly the lumbering beast had a brain with a slight change in DNA.

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 10:53:57   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
straightUp wrote:
What exactly are you calling l*****t pseudo-science?


Good question! I'm glad you asked.

To begin, let me ask you a question: Do you believe in science?

If you answered 'yes', then the 'science' you believe in is l*****t pseudo-science. Why? Because true science isn't a belief system, it's a tool. I don't 'believe in science' any more than I believe in a hammer, or a gun. Unlike a hammer, gun, or any other physical tool, science is not a physical object but a methodology for determining t***h, or fact.

True science is the use of the scientific method to propose a theory, then develop experiments to test that theory, then reach conclusions based on the results of said experiments.

In l*****t pseudo-science, a theory is developed, then experiments are taylored to give the desired results. Data that doesn't meet expectations is falsified or omitted, normal criteria are changed, and peer review is limited to only other l*****t pseudo-scientists who agree with the original theory. Computer models are written to give the desired results, then those results are used to give credence to the theory. 'Facts' are then determined not by the results of true experimentation, but by 'consensus'. In other words, if enough l*****t pseudo-scientists believe hard enough in a lie, that belief can make it 'true'.

Unfortunately, due to the l*****t takeover of the university systems, today true science has been mostly replaced by l*****t pseudo-science, to the detriment of all but the l*****t pseudo-scientists and the politicians they serve. Since the renaissance true science has benefited society beyond measure, now the l*****t pseudo-scientists have hijacked that honorable profession and bastardized its good reputation and methodology in order to push a l*****t agenda on an unsuspecting and misinformed public.

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 10:58:06   #
Iliamna1
 
moldyoldy wrote:
e

God created, and then aliens altered. Then suddenly the lumbering beast had a brain with a slight change in DNA.


Wrong, as usual. Sin entered the world and what was originally created as good, became polluted by sin. Aliens weren't involved.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.