One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Radical DEMS Complain that the $3.6 Billion T***sfer from Defense Budget to Secure Walls is Unconstitutional.
Sep 5, 2019 20:17:01   #
Radiance3
 
Not so. Securing the walls is also part of the National Defense. Priority is important. Currently, we use tens of thousands of our military and national securities personnel protecting our borders. But this process is inferior and not very effective, and temporary. More surge of illegal invasions came in. This move is prioritizing spending where current national security is of utmost need for our country. We have a national crisis.

Since January 2019, the president has been asking appropriation from Congress for the walls securing the borders. The radical DEMS refused, instead accused the president of being r****t. The fact that they all want open borders.

We don't have a country if closing the border is not prioritized. Our sovereign rights are gone. Currently, estimated of 33 million i******s are now in this country. Causing severe national security threats, poverty, and eventually lose our very own country. This is invasion.

All kinds of people are now inside. Terrorists, drug dealers, drug addicts, criminals, rapists, sexual predators. And 80% want handouts. A country without sovereign law is not a country at all. Drug dealers with tons of drugs poisoning our people are rampant.

US want legal immigration. Go follow the narrow way, as Jesus had advised. For wide is the door. Matthew 7:13: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in there at.

America, please v**e all RED in the 2020 e******n.

Reply
Sep 5, 2019 21:07:56   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Not so. Securing the walls is also part of the National Defense. Priority is important. Currently, we use tens of thousands of our military and national securities personnel protecting our borders. But this process is inferior and not very effective, and temporary. More surge of illegal invasions came in. This move is prioritizing spending where current national security is of utmost need for our country. We have a national crisis.

Since January 2019, the president has been asking appropriation from Congress for the walls securing the borders. The radical DEMS refused, instead accused the president of being r****t. The fact that they all want open borders.

We don't have a country if closing the border is not prioritized. Our sovereign rights are gone. Currently, estimated of 33 million i******s are now in this country. Causing severe national security threats, poverty, and eventually lose our very own country. This is invasion.

All kinds of people are now inside. Terrorists, drug dealers, drug addicts, criminals, rapists, sexual predators. And 80% want handouts. A country without sovereign law is not a country at all. Drug dealers with tons of drugs poisoning our people are rampant.

US want legal immigration. Go follow the narrow way, as Jesus had advised. For wide is the door. Matthew 7:13: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in there at.

America, please v**e all RED in the 2020 e******n.
color=red b Not so. Securing the walls is also p... (show quote)
The funds in question were originally frozen by a federal judge, and his ruling was upheld in the DC appellate court, SCOTUS lifted the freeze and ruled that the money could be used for border security. Radical Dems will have to take that up with the Supreme Court.

Reply
Sep 5, 2019 22:02:40   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The funds in question were originally frozen by a federal judge, and his ruling was upheld in the DC appellate court, SCOTUS lifted the freeze and ruled that the money could be used for border security. Radical Dems will have to take that up with the Supreme Court.


I find it strange that all the sudden the Democrats are worried about the military having enough money.

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2019 22:55:17   #
Radiance3
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The funds in question were originally frozen by a federal judge, and his ruling was upheld in the DC appellate court, SCOTUS lifted the freeze and ruled that the money could be used for border security. Radical Dems will have to take that up with the Supreme Court.

=============
SCOTUS did it right. Priority for national security emergency, the president made the right decision.

During the Obama administration, he made fund t***sfers to areas where budgets were not appropriated. In 2009, the Stimulus Funds for $865 billion were spent to various areas that were not needed to correct the economic crisis.

$1.3 billion was provided to Morsi's Egyt, $900 million to Hamas, and hundreds of millions more to build and rebuild Mosques all over the world. $500 million loan to Solyndra that they bankrupted within few months. Those were corruptions. Cash for Clunkers, and so much funds wasted which did not correct the economy. Hundreds of billions went UAW retirement funds. And so many others. But still he further bankrupted the country after he left. The radical DEMS did not complain at all.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 08:30:50   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Not so. Securing the walls is also part of the National Defense. Priority is important. Currently, we use tens of thousands of our military and national securities personnel protecting our borders. But this process is inferior and not very effective, and temporary. More surge of illegal invasions came in. This move is prioritizing spending where current national security is of utmost need for our country. We have a national crisis.

Since January 2019, the president has been asking appropriation from Congress for the walls securing the borders. The radical DEMS refused, instead accused the president of being r****t. The fact that they all want open borders.

We don't have a country if closing the border is not prioritized. Our sovereign rights are gone. Currently, estimated of 33 million i******s are now in this country. Causing severe national security threats, poverty, and eventually lose our very own country. This is invasion.

All kinds of people are now inside. Terrorists, drug dealers, drug addicts, criminals, rapists, sexual predators. And 80% want handouts. A country without sovereign law is not a country at all. Drug dealers with tons of drugs poisoning our people are rampant.

US want legal immigration. Go follow the narrow way, as Jesus had advised. For wide is the door. Matthew 7:13: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in there at.

America, please v**e all RED in the 2020 e******n.
color=red b Not so. Securing the walls is also p... (show quote)


When is Mexico going to pay us back?

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 10:46:48   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
lpnmajor wrote:
When is Mexico going to pay us back?


The theory would be; we would be getting paid back indirectly. Less i******s, less government expense. Less foreign workers (especially Latinos) sending billions out of the country to families back home. Stream lined i*********n l*ws would save a lot of money. However; I don't know how we get there. Cut foreign aid to countries that do nothing to stop i*****l i*********n into our country. All common sense, so it'll never happen.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 10:47:18   #
Radiance3
 
lpnmajor wrote:
When is Mexico going to pay us back?

================
They are paying. The Mexican security forces, tens of thousands of them securing their borders preventing those i******s to come in. As a result, there was a reduction of invasion into our country since prior months.

Since the Cold War the US have been providing foreign assistance to the Mexican countries and the South of the Border. This policy was to avert the Soviet influence over these countries, since the Cold War.

I think those must be eliminated now that the Soviet Union has weakened and no longer a threat. Why are Hispanics mostly crooks and dumbells? They are experts on drug making poisoning the world.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/26/us-aid-320-million-mexico-wall-trump-specialists-backfire/97103024/

U.S. Foreign Assistance to Latin America and the Caribbea
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45089.pdf


Reply
 
 
Sep 7, 2019 11:47:30   #
bahmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
They are paying. The Mexican security forces, tens of thousands of them securing their borders preventing those i******s to come in. As a result, there was a reduction of invasion into our country since prior months.

Since the Cold War the US have been providing foreign assistance to the Mexican countries and the South of the Border. This policy was to avert the Soviet influence over these countries, since the Cold War.

I think those must be eliminated now that the Soviet Union has weakened and no longer a threat. Why are Hispanics mostly crooks and dumbells? They are experts on drug making poisoning the world.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/26/us-aid-320-million-mexico-wall-trump-specialists-backfire/97103024/

U.S. Foreign Assistance to Latin America and the Caribbea
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45089.pdf

================ br They are paying. The Mexican s... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.