One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Where The Constitution Is Like The Bible And Contradicts Itself, Which Rules Prevail?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Sep 1, 2019 10:05:21   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)


If becoming "human beings," which you claim conservatives have not yet measured up to your atheistic standards, means we must accept, adopt and sanction the immorality and d*****t behavior more common to demons than humanity - it will never happen. Too many real human beings possess an informed conscience and know right from wrong, good from evil!

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 11:58:35   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
woodguru wrote:
The constitution doesn't generally contradict itself very much, the bible a bit more. So those who believe in god, what do they believe when the bible sends mixed messages, which ones do people go by? Many go by the message that is what they want to believe, that fits their personal beliefs. One christian adheres to tenets of loving their fellow man and they have a tolerance for gays, others flip out about gays and latch onto words that are harsher about gays.

My point being the basic fundamental premise of a democracy is one person one v**e, all v**es being equal whether they be a black, white, hispanic, or muslim.

The concept of taking the power of their one v**e away from people is anti constitutional to the core. Given the one person one v**e basis there is a conflict of interest that needs to be sorted. Either say we are not a democracy by the people for the people or take a hard look at the very concept of what an e*******l college is and what it's for, and determine whether that is more important than the core premise. The united states is the only country in the world that deviates from one person one v**e, and it is an i***tic concept.

States have their sovereignty in singular state issues that the rest of the country can't dictate to them that their state government can set the rules on, the united states has an obligation to provide the same basic rights to everyone in the country concerning civil rights. E******n rules need to be adopted that standardize rules and procedures that work so that states can't monkey with people's ability to v**e the way several states are.

As pointed out by Hayes, since 1992 republicans have won the popular one time but had three presidents, if it were the other way the e*******l would have been eliminated a long time ago. Republicans can keep their red states and do wh**ever they want for those states, but America is unfortunately a dem majority country and the rules need to favor that majority. This minority controlled country is destroying democracy to keep control.

https://dennismichaellynch.com/video-msnbcs-chris-hayes-if-the-e*******l-college-wasnt-in-the-constitution-it-would-be-unconstitutional/
The constitution doesn't generally contradict itse... (show quote)


Only nonbelievers or those that are perishing believe the Bible contradicts itself! Try reading it in the context it was written!

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 12:01:20   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)


We are not a secular nation! U are an anomaly! Many Christians still abound! You and Obama got it wrong! You will see when our chosen president wins again!

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2019 13:19:11   #
Seth
 
woodguru wrote:
The constitution doesn't generally contradict itself very much, the bible a bit more. So those who believe in god, what do they believe when the bible sends mixed messages, which ones do people go by? Many go by the message that is what they want to believe, that fits their personal beliefs. One christian adheres to tenets of loving their fellow man and they have a tolerance for gays, others flip out about gays and latch onto words that are harsher about gays.

My point being the basic fundamental premise of a democracy is one person one v**e, all v**es being equal whether they be a black, white, hispanic, or muslim.

The concept of taking the power of their one v**e away from people is anti constitutional to the core. Given the one person one v**e basis there is a conflict of interest that needs to be sorted. Either say we are not a democracy by the people for the people or take a hard look at the very concept of what an e*******l college is and what it's for, and determine whether that is more important than the core premise. The united states is the only country in the world that deviates from one person one v**e, and it is an i***tic concept.

States have their sovereignty in singular state issues that the rest of the country can't dictate to them that their state government can set the rules on, the united states has an obligation to provide the same basic rights to everyone in the country concerning civil rights. E******n rules need to be adopted that standardize rules and procedures that work so that states can't monkey with people's ability to v**e the way several states are.

As pointed out by Hayes, since 1992 republicans have won the popular one time but had three presidents, if it were the other way the e*******l would have been eliminated a long time ago. Republicans can keep their red states and do wh**ever they want for those states, but America is unfortunately a dem majority country and the rules need to favor that majority. This minority controlled country is destroying democracy to keep control.

https://dennismichaellynch.com/video-msnbcs-chris-hayes-if-the-e*******l-college-wasnt-in-the-constitution-it-would-be-unconstitutional/
The constitution doesn't generally contradict itse... (show quote)


"... doesn't generally contradict itself very much..." Hmmm....

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 14:13:46   #
son of witless
 
PeterS wrote:
Glad someone finally admits that Conservatives are EVIL, IMMORAL, BACKED BY SATAN, LIES CONSTANTLY, etc, etc, etc. Divine T***h, you are a breath of fresh air...


Is that what he said ? You can really read between the lines and get to the invisible ink.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 14:20:25   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)


Who gave you the right to determine who is and isn't a human? Oh, my bad, you're a Dem so you are smarter than anyone who disagrees with you. Walkaway before you become insane. It may already be too late for you since you have replaced God with yourself. The Bible has never contradicted itself, you've just haven't applied yourself because thinking yourself wise, you've become an i***t.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 14:55:01   #
Seth
 
son of witless wrote:
Is that what he said ? You can really read between the lines and get to the invisible ink.




Is that a sk**l, or what!?

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2019 14:57:59   #
son of witless
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)



" That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president "

I dispute that statement and here is my reasoning. Both Hillary and Trump knew the rules of the e******n going in. Please tell me that you follow me so far ? Both candidates knew that the contest was NOT to win the overall popular v**e. The contest was to win the E*******l College. Their strategies, THUS were to win individual states. Both candidates campaigned in individual states in order to win the E*******l V**es.

If the rules were to win the overall popular v**e, both candidates would have pursued different strategies, and there is no way for anyone to know how that would have come out.

When athletes compete in a race, they compete by what ever rules were in place beforehand. In a relay race it is not the fastest team that necessarily win the race, it is the fastest team that does not drop the baton.

Your girl Hillary beat my boy Donald around the track, but she di-int have her baton in hand when she finished so she lost.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 15:33:37   #
Seth
 
son of witless wrote:
" That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president "

I dispute that statement and here is my reasoning. Both Hillary and Trump knew the rules of the e******n going in. Please tell me that you follow me so far ? Both candidates knew that the contest was NOT to win the overall popular v**e. The contest was to win the E*******l College. Their strategies, THUS were to win individual states. Both candidates campaigned in individual states in order to win the E*******l V**es.

If the rules were to win the overall popular v**e, both candidates would have pursued different strategies, and there is no way for anyone to know how that would have come out.

When athletes compete in a race, they compete by what ever rules were in place beforehand. In a relay race it is not the fastest team that necessarily win the race, it is the fastest team that does not drop the baton.

Your girl Hillary beat my boy Donald around the track, but she di-int have her baton in hand when she finished so she lost.
" That said, if we were a true Democracy Hi... (show quote)


That was an excellent way to explain things. I hope the logic doesn't cause any circuit overloads over on the left.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 15:58:01   #
son of witless
 
Seth wrote:
That was an excellent way to explain things. I hope the logic doesn't cause any circuit overloads over on the left.


I think i got the original idea from Limbaugh, but I put my own spin on it. Even when Bush beat Gore, they both campaigned on winning states E*******l v**es. That forces candidates to go to the hinterland states and not forget about them. That was a very deliberate act by the Founders. It has worked for over 2 centuries.

I think if you change the rules, it will not change the outcomes, but it will give more power to states like California and New York State. Candidates will adapt to the new rules. Even within the states the rule change would benefit Democrats because as a rule. they rule the cities.

Reply
Sep 2, 2019 06:14:37   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Rose42 wrote:
The bible doesn't contradict itself. It is man that contradicts the bible.


Amen!

Reply
 
 
Sep 2, 2019 06:19:33   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
son of witless wrote:
" That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president "

I dispute that statement and here is my reasoning. Both Hillary and Trump knew the rules of the e******n going in. Please tell me that you follow me so far ? Both candidates knew that the contest was NOT to win the overall popular v**e. The contest was to win the E*******l College. Their strategies, THUS were to win individual states. Both candidates campaigned in individual states in order to win the E*******l V**es.

If the rules were to win the overall popular v**e, both candidates would have pursued different strategies, and there is no way for anyone to know how that would have come out.

When athletes compete in a race, they compete by what ever rules were in place beforehand. In a relay race it is not the fastest team that necessarily win the race, it is the fastest team that does not drop the baton.

Your girl Hillary beat my boy Donald around the track, but she di-int have her baton in hand when she finished so she lost.
" That said, if we were a true Democracy Hi... (show quote)


Spot on!

Reply
Sep 2, 2019 08:18:17   #
Gatsby
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)


Twice, you imply that those who disagree with you are not Human Beings.
Twice, you side with Human Garbage, such as Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler.
You promote a******n, which has "slaughtered more Human Beings" than Hitler and Stalin combined:
And you advocate for the "Butcher of Libya".

It is humans such as yourself that are taking leave of the Human Race, to become Homo Stupidious.

Reply
Sep 2, 2019 09:56:43   #
I am John Galt
 
Divine t***h wrote:
There isn't no Constitution in America, in words only, but not in the letter, spirit or application of the law.

In America the cult or the Satanic cult, international banker, Zionst Ashken**i Jews, Homosexuality and feminist movement have hijacked the Constitution.

I wouldn't make this bold statement, without evidence to support it, or substantiate the t***h herein stated.

The Bible and the Constitution contradicts itself, and have subjected the state of affairs to a ball of confusion.

Democracy is a fraud on its face, and the reality is C*******t have been described as democracy and the Democratic Party activities is tanamount to barbarism, and terrorism.

What we call Democrats is really C*******t or socialism, and democracy is tyranny terrorism, with activists judicial officers to protect them, in this madness and egergoius violations.

If there's exist the original Constitution, then the actions, behavior, attitude, disposition and thinking of our so-called leadership and public servant, would be reflective of the letter, spirit and law of the Constitution.

The founding fathers and drafters of the Constitution is turning over in their grave, because activists judicial Officers, are reinterpreting the Constitution to fix their sexual interest, and or desire.

Same sex marriage is a example that the Constitution don't exit, and it is fitting for others sexual interest and desire, and is reinterpreting, and not interpreted as the supreme law of the land.

When, a federal Magistrate can state in his arbitrary decision, that a individual don't have "a right to liberty, under Parole s**m", the Constitution has lost its meaning of liberty.

New York State Parole s**m is a homosexual s**m, and recruitment initiative and Zionst design. If there was a living active constitution, I'll be a part of the body of Christ, and not in the body of Islam.
There isn't no Constitution in America, in words o... (show quote)


What a F-ed up ramble! Please get back on your meds and keep your guns locked away!

Reply
Sep 2, 2019 13:33:28   #
jeff smith
 
PeterS wrote:
Since we are a secular nation I could care less about the bible. That said, if we were a true Democracy Hillary Clinton would be president and while I find that prospect better than the alternative the prospect of our largest population state always swinging the e******n I find a bit chilling.

All Hillary needed to do to be president was to hit the midwest and Penn a few times instead of completely ignoring them. That's why the e*******l college was established--so candidates had to pay attention to all the states no matter how big or small.

And who's to say, maybe cons will become human beings and by doing so and attracting Hispanics, which are a natural fit, then states like Texas and California will be permanently conservative and Democrats will never win another e******n. No, keep the e*******l college. Besides it's only a matter of years before Texas turns blue and cons will never win another e******n anyway--unless they decide to join the human race--which I doubt will ever happen...
Since we are a secular nation I could care less ab... (show quote)


we are not a secular nation . this is something you want . WE are a Judeo, Christian nation . it is just people who want to do any and every thing they want to do without consequences . these are the ones who say we are secular . ///////////////// as for your witch hitlary ! she lost because she was / is , a back stabbing snake in the grass . a forked tonged two faced lying wench . ////////////// so odd that you might call yourself an American . yet every dem. politician keeps moving further and further to the left . don't you people like this country ? this country may have a ways to go before every one is treated the same . but we have come a long way from the way we were . seems to me that the dem. leadership wants to basically burn the constitution and the bill of rights and replace it with some thing else . what is it that you would like to replace it with ? /////////// join the human race ? you see , I am not a bimbocrat nor a rinopublican , I v**e for the person I think will lead this country forward . by the constitution and the bill of rights . conservatives , cons as you call them, are mostly people who want this great country of ours run by the rule of law . by the constitution and bill of rights . a set of morals . this is right and that is wrong . if there were no laws or morals to guide this nation . then what would we have ? chaos . might makes right . or is this what you want ?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.