One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Student BANNED From Colorado School…
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 30, 2019 17:49:55   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 18:01:43   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-fo... (show quote)


Colorado is run by Democrats...Should i say more???

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 18:09:17   #
bahmer
 
proud republican wrote:
Colorado is run by Democrats...Should i say more???


Amen and Amen

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2019 18:15:35   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
bahmer wrote:
Amen and Amen


If the liberals have it their way every person wanting a career in law enforcement won't be eligible if they shot a gun before their 21st birthday. It won't be long.

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 18:19:33   #
Carol Kelly
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-fo... (show quote)


As I understand the constitution, this is revoking his constitutional right to attend a public school. How this Supreme Court will determine is anyone’s guess. If I were that family, I’d sell out and move but not before hiring a lawyer and attending that trial by teachers. And maybe sue the school board. How are the other residents with school age boys reacting?

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 18:20:53   #
Carol Kelly
 
dtucker300 wrote:
If the liberals have it their way every person wanting a career in law enforcement won't be eligible if they shot a gun before their 21st birthday. It won't be long.


You make a good point. If you’re a decent person, why would you want to put your life on the line for such i***ts.

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 18:36:24   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
As I understand the constitution, this is revoking his constitutional right to attend a public school. How this Supreme Court will determine is anyone’s guess. If I were that family, I’d sell out and move but not before hiring a lawyer and attending that trial by teachers. And maybe sue the school board. How are the other residents with school age boys reacting?


Do you think this could make it to the SCOTUS? I don't think so. It takes a few clear-thinking individuals to set the rest of the bureaucrats straight in that school district. I would think this would resolve itself almost immediately. I can't see it going any further. But when it comes to the irrational left, nothing surprises me.

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2019 18:57:53   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-fo... (show quote)



They get more stupid by the minute.

As a very rural state with a lot of wilderness, I'm sure there is a very active hunting community, and I'm sure many a kid has gone out hunting with a parent before turning 21. Here is a kid learning shooting safety and bonding with a parent and this is somehow bad.

Calling the police over some on line gun stuff with a kid involved. Okay.

Kid and mother is cleared by the police. Good.

The school notifying his parents by voice mail is about as classless as it can get. Utterly stupid

A school wide email to all of the other parents that this kid might be a "threat" sounds like slander and definitely something that should be thought of as grounds to sue the hell out of the school and any official that falsely accused this kid of being a threat after the police had cleared him.

They refused to give him his schoolwork. Depriving him of his guaranteed right to an education without justification. Another law suit.

The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence. Like the article said, he had already been cleared by the police. He has nothing to prove. It is they who have an obligation to prove he is a treat.

This is the kind of stupidity that breeds radicals. Every official involved should be fired, without severance or any other compensation after they lose that very justifiable law suit.

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 05:44:58   #
rebob14
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-fo... (show quote)


These parasites are employees of the parents they are persecuting. They should be placed on unpaid leave. There is no lawful authority for what they have done!

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 06:23:25   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Do you think this could make it to the SCOTUS? I don't think so. It takes a few clear-thinking individuals to set the rest of the bureaucrats straight in that school district. I would think this would resolve itself almost immediately. I can't see it going any further. But when it comes to the irrational left, nothing surprises me.


Want the movie star libs off the gun bandwagon? Make it a law u can’t have guns in movies! Or video games! Also make drug testing part of owning a gun! Bo anti-depressants, which is what most of the shooters were on since childhood!

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 08:10:00   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-for-visiting-gun-range/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Posted by Sean Robertson | Aug 30, 2019 | Politics

Student BANNED From Colorado School… You’ll Never Guess Why
Imagine: you’re a young, 16-year-old student living in a rural part of the beautiful state of Colorado…

You’re a regular kid. You like sports, h*****g with your friends, and spending time with your family.

Now, being from a rural part of a state that is known for their outdoor activities, one of your family’s pastimes happens to be safely shooting guns at a local gun range…

So, imagine how nice it would be if your mother picked you up early from school one day so the two of you can have some mother/son bonding over shooting a few targets.

That’d be nice, right? Being able to connect with family members over some fun and beneficial activities sounds wonderful.

Of course it would…

So the thought of this being a problem in the eyes of the law or the government probably didn’t enter the minds of either Nate Myers or his mother, Justine. They were just out for an afternoon of fun, family activities.

They must have forgotten we’re living in the 21st Century…

Because this fun afternoon has turned into a nightmare for the Myers family.

Family Outing Turns Into Nightmare
Why?

Well, because Nate, being a school-aged kid with a cellphone, had his mom capture some of their adventure on video, which he then posted on social media like any other kid would do.

Being with his mom, he probably didn’t think anything of it…

Until he got home.


It wasn’t until they got a knock on their door that things took a turn for the worst…

It was the police. They had gotten reports that Nate was a potential threat due to the pictures and videos he had posted online.

However…

After reviewing said videos, the police determined that Nate wasn’t a threat to ANYONE. Beyond that, they deemed that neither he nor his mom did anything wrong or illegal.

So…

The Myers family had a good laugh and a good lesson in why following the laws is important.

However, that story changed when they woke up the next day and found out that Nate would NOT be allowed to return to school. He was now officially a “threat,” and was banned until further notice.

How?

Through a voicemail, the school informed the family that not only would Nate NOT be allowed back to school but that a school-wide email had been sent to other parents notifying them of the “threat” that Nate could pose.

Is This A 2nd Amendment Issue?
But the Myers family didn’t panic…

The police had been there the day before and could clear up this whole misunderstanding. Justine called the school to inform them that the police had already investigated and determined that Nate was not a threat and that she hadn’t done anything illegal.

The school didn’t care…

Not only did they refuse to give her ANY information about the “threat” …

But they also REFUSED to give Nate his schoolwork.

The Myers ONLY recourse? The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence.

They’ve already been cleared by the police…

And now school officials – with education degrees – are going to have to make a psychological judgment on whether a child is a threat or not?

Does this seem “right”?

Does this seem FAIR?

It’s like they’re working BACKWARDS. What will a school official know that a police officer wouldn’t?

That’s like the chef telling you the food in a restaurant is good – but now the waiters and waitresses want to weigh in on the decision of whether or not you should eat there.


It’s a dumb process…

It’s naïve…

But the true question is: is it unconstitutional?

We’ll find out soon enough…



“Government! Three fourths parasitic and the other fourth Stupid fumbling.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
https://freedomwire.com/colorado-student-banned-fo... (show quote)


We don't do anything reasonably or cautiously, we barrel through full tilt.....................then swing back the other way. We act like completely ignoring stuff, or a strict zero tolerance stance are our only choices.

Reply
 
 
Aug 31, 2019 10:35:49   #
bahmer
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
They get more stupid by the minute.

As a very rural state with a lot of wilderness, I'm sure there is a very active hunting community, and I'm sure many a kid has gone out hunting with a parent before turning 21. Here is a kid learning shooting safety and bonding with a parent and this is somehow bad.

Calling the police over some on line gun stuff with a kid involved. Okay.

Kid and mother is cleared by the police. Good.

The school notifying his parents by voice mail is about as classless as it can get. Utterly stupid

A school wide email to all of the other parents that this kid might be a "threat" sounds like slander and definitely something that should be thought of as grounds to sue the hell out of the school and any official that falsely accused this kid of being a threat after the police had cleared him.

They refused to give him his schoolwork. Depriving him of his guaranteed right to an education without justification. Another law suit.

The could attend a “threat assessment hearing” with seven different school officials and make a case for Nate’s innocence. Like the article said, he had already been cleared by the police. He has nothing to prove. It is they who have an obligation to prove he is a treat.

This is the kind of stupidity that breeds radicals. Every official involved should be fired, without severance or any other compensation after they lose that very justifiable law suit.
They get more stupid by the minute. br br As a v... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 11:39:18   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
proud republican wrote:
Colorado is run by Democrats...Should i say more???




Democrats always strain a gnat and swallow a camel.

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 12:56:07   #
Carol Kelly
 
proud republican wrote:
Colorado is run by Democrats...Should i say more???


Enuf!

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 12:56:53   #
Carol Kelly
 
maximus wrote:
Democrats always strain a gnat and swallow a camel.


May I quote you? Never heard that one before.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.