teabag09

T***s activism’s latest trick: vandalizing women’s shelters

A Vancouver rape crisis center had rats nailed to the door and posted through the mailbox

Meghan Murphy

vancouver t***s vandalizing




Meghan Murphy

August 29, 2019

1:27 PM



What kind of person would threaten and harass a rape crisis center? Here in Vancouver, we have the answer: t***s activists. While it might sound odd to the uninitiated that those who claim to value ‘inclusivity’ and ‘acceptance’ would also be the same people who nail a dead rat to the door of a t***sition house for battered women, those of us following the g****r identity debate closely are all too familiar with this type of occurrence.




On Tuesday, Vancouver Rape Relief & Woman’s Shelter (VRRWS) tweeted images of vandalism left on their storefront — a space used for meetings, events, and support groups. ‘K**l TERFs,’ ‘Fuck TERFs,’ ‘TERFs go home, you are not welcome,’ ‘T***swomen are women,’ and ‘T***s Power’ had been scrawled across the windows and door in black marker. ‘TERF,’ for the blissfully ignorant, is an acronym that stands for ‘t***s-exclusionary radical feminist.’ This is, of course, a misnomer. Radical feminists are not interested in ‘excluding’ t***s-identified people from anything. What they are interested in is protecting certain spaces designated for women and girls. If anything, they are ‘male-exclusionary,’ though it seems a little silly to frame the women’s changing room as ‘non-inclusive’ just because men aren’t allowed to prance around in there with their dicks out. It would be akin to calling the vet ‘human-exclusionary’ or a baseball game ‘soccer-exclusionary.’ The women’s changing room is for women, the men’s is for men, and a baseball game is for hitting balls with bats and/or drinking beer and feeling confused because you don’t really understand this sport and are only there for the drunken yelling and hot dogs.

The issue at hand and the cause of disagreement between feminists and t***s activists is ideological: those who advocate g****r identity ideology (t***s activists) subscribe to a fringe religion that believes some people are born in the wrong body and that it is possible for males to become female by declaring it so, and feminists believe in material reality. Tough call!

_____

Subscribe to The Spectator now for unlimited digital access and our forthcoming print magazine

_____

VRRWS has been targeted not only with vandalism, but with dead animals nailed to their door and stuffed through their mail slot, on account of their women-only policy. They operate a t***sition house for women and their children, which aims to protect abused women and help them to heal from horrific violence and sexual assault. To most, it makes sense that a space for extremely vulnerable women escaping male violence would exclude men. For t***s activists, it makes sense to disembowel a skunk and string it up by its neck — noose-like — to hang it on the door where victims of rape and domestic abuse will find it and read it as (yet another) violent threat.

It’s hard to take sides on this one, but local would-be politician, Morgane Oger, managed to, tweeting:


‘Regrettably but predictably, VRR choosing to ignore Canada’s civil rights laws causes blow-back. I empathize VRR feel threatened by the predictable response to their conduct. As I have previously offered, I am ready to help VRR get out of their mess if they wish to.’

In other words, those b***hes deserved it.

Many progressives like Oger have accused the women involved in Vancouver Rape Relief and their supporters of being ‘h**eful’. Oger also led a (successful) campaign to end a $30,000 City grant the organization had been receiving for education purposes, claiming their practice of serving women alone and hiring only female counselors discriminated against men. Well, to be specific, men who announce they are women. During a City hearing to determine the continuation of this grant, Oger accused VRRWS of ‘having a history of discrimination against t*********r women on the basis of their g****r identity or g****r expression.’ This is untrue, as services and spaces that are women-only don’t care about a person’s g****r identity or g****r expression. Indeed, feminists in particular are mostly thrilled when individuals choose to reject sexist g****r roles. Many of them prefer pants to skirts and grow their armpit hair as long as they please. The point is that rejecting g****r roles does not actually change one’s sex.