One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
True Christians Have Dumped the Democratic Party
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
Aug 25, 2019 17:31:36   #
debeda
 
vernon wrote:
its not just Christians its anyone with good sense. The demoRATS don't help anyone but themselves and its been that way always. demorats have always done this and they will never change. They have fought Trump on every move but he always comes through. KEEP BUILDING THE WALL. It only proves that demorats don't work for the working man just themselves and the chamber of commerce and anyone that gives them money.


well said!

Reply
Aug 25, 2019 17:32:26   #
debeda
 
woodguru wrote:
Factually incorrect...true christians have no h**e in their bodies or souls, they don't hat gays, b****s, muslims, or mexicans, illegal or otherwise. That would make them democrats since h**ers are pretty much of the right persuasion by definition.


You're right, they strive not to h**e. Which is why they cant align with Democrats

Reply
Aug 25, 2019 17:33:04   #
debeda
 
Rose42 wrote:
Wrong again. At least you know how to spell Christian but you don't know what they're about.

They do h**e - they h**e sin. They don't h**e homosexuals or anyone else as the alt left loves to claim. Of course the left h**es Christianity and never do you see them make that complaint about muslims - you included. Christians could be democrats but they would not support a******n, or the g****r madness that the democrat party supports - especially directed at children. That is sick.

You always claim its the right that h**es - again you are wrong. The left's hatred manifests itself in many ways and one important one in particular - its championing of 2000 innocent lives k**led every day. That's depravity.
Wrong again. At least you know how to spell Chris... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Aug 25, 2019 21:37:44   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Lonewolf wrote:
No Christian could support trump I watched you republican Christians let Mitch Romney lead you in prayer to the Mormon God!

Mystery Solved: Why Evangelicals Support Trump
Bryan Preston August 21, 2019
• Why do evangelical Christians support President Trump?
• What's the appeal?
• To people who profess family values.
• Of a man whose life includes multiple marriages and affairs.
• And who tends to be crude?
• Let's dive into this alleged mystery.
• Turn with me if you will to the book of Isaiah, chapter 45.
• We come to the story of Cyrus the Great.
• He was not a king of Israel or Judah.
• He was emperor of Persia from 539-530 BC.
• Persia tended to be an enemy of the children of Israel.
• It's now called Iran.
• And continues to be an enemy of Israel.
• But Cyrus himself was not.
• God called Cyrus "my servant."
• And Cyrus followed through.
• Cyrus decreed that the Jewish exiles in Babylon could return to their homes and re-establish their country.
• He also allowed them to rebuild the temple.
• This was a big deal.
• Judah had been subjugated and exiled for 70 years.
• Their ability to worship disrupted by the destruction of their temple in Jerusalem.
• Yet here was Cyrus, who was not one of them, playing a major role in fostering the Jews' return home.
• Consider a recent headline: Bibi Heaps Praise on Trump, Compares to Persian King Cyrus the Great
• I do have a point.
• NeverTrumper Ben Howe has a book out called The Immoral Majority: Why Evangelicals Chose Political Power over Christian Values.
• Howe has been doing a lot of TV, MSNBC included, defending that incendiary title.
• I have not read the book.
• I've seen him defend, it including the title, which suggests it reflects what he really thinks.
• The thesis smears evangelicals.
• It's fair to say Donald Trump is not an evangelical.
• He's never been called one.
• And has not called himself one.
• Technically, he's Presbyterian.
• As a New York liberal for most of his life, he had no conservative credibility prior to 2016.
• Conservative evangelicals were very skeptical of him.
• And many did not support him in the 2016 primary.
• Initially, countless others thought his candidacy was Seinfeldian — about nothing.
• But by the time he won the Republican primary in 2016, a few things became clear.
• One: Donald Trump could win the presidency (though it looked unlikely).
• Two: He seemed to have grasped a fact that eluded Jeb Bush and John Kasich.
• Namely, that if you run as a Republican you shouldn't spend most of your time insulting Republicans.
• Not, at least, if you want them to v**e for you (or applaud your speeches).
• You should probably spend the bulk of your time articulating a positive conservative vision and lambasting the left's rage and socialism.
• Trump did that.
• His passion suggested he might actually put up a fight against the left.
• The worse they treated him, the more he seemed to be readying for a fight.
• Three: However flawed Trump might be.
• And he is.
• He was obviously better for the country and for evangelicals than any Democrat would be.
• Recall that Trump was running after eight years of President Obama.
• Those eight years saw the federal government attempt to force nuns, literally the Little Sisters of the Poor, to violate their consciences and fund birth control.
• Obama took them to court over that.
• The eight years of Obama saw activist l*****ts haul Christian cake bakers to court and destroy their livelihood.
• The eight years of Obama saw a very emboldened left vent its hatred for everyone to their right.
• And evangelicals knew we were in their crosshairs.
• They went after Christian-owned Hobby Lobby.
• They used our tax dollars to fund a******n.
• They made their disdain for our faith abundantly clear.
• The Democrats' 2016 appeal to us amounted to "V**e for us, you stupid, r****t, bucktoothed h**ers!"
• That's terrible marketing anywhere outside the New York Times newsroom.
• Their 2020 message is worse.
• They're pushing failed 19th-century socialism paired with anti-Semitism (while calling us "r****t").
• Along with the policy plan that just finished k*****g Venezuela.
• They want to erase our borders.
• And take away our guns.
• They'll betray Israel at the first opportunity.
• Remember — Rep. Eric Swalwell (D) threatened to nuke gun owners!
• Plus: they still h**e evangelicals.
• And want us to pay for a******n on demand.
• Hillary Clinton did not offer a break from any of that.
• She called us "deplorable."
• And relished cranking Obama's hostility up a notch.
• That's not a good look.
• Ditto for the NeverTrumpers.
• Facepalm.
• Stupid.
• So, Trump emerged as a kind of Cyrus figure.
• Not necessarily "one of us."
• But not someone who would not go out of his way to smear or hurt us either.
• Somebody might misread that previous line, so as Obama would say, let me be clear.
• Trump would be benign toward evangelicals.
• And might even be helpful, as Cyrus was helpful toward Israel.
• The previous is not meant to suggest Trump would literally become an emperor.
• We're not interested in that.
• Speaking for many evangelicals, Trump earned our v**es by articulating many of our ideals fearlessly.
• This suggested he might actually follow through, unlike many who have called themselves "conservative" for their entire lives but "grow" left once they get to Washington.
• If we got some policy wins out of him, all the better.
• Trump has been strongly pro-life.
• Strongly pro-American.
• Strongly pro-Israel.
• Strongly pro-capitalism.
• And he has pushed back against the freedom-robbing regulatory state.
• He cut taxes.
• And he left evangelicals alone.
• He didn't sue the nuns.
• He doesn't want our guns.
• V****g for Trump is not "trading Christian values for political power."
• It's v****g in self-defense against the radical, evangelical-hating left.
• And hoping for the best.
• And getting more than expected.

Reply
Aug 25, 2019 21:47:41   #
debeda
 
Parky60 wrote:
Mystery Solved: Why Evangelicals Support Trump
Bryan Preston August 21, 2019
• Why do evangelical Christians support President Trump?
• What's the appeal?
• To people who profess family values.
• Of a man whose life includes multiple marriages and affairs.
• And who tends to be crude?
• Let's dive into this alleged mystery.
• Turn with me if you will to the book of Isaiah, chapter 45.
• We come to the story of Cyrus the Great.
• He was not a king of Israel or Judah.
• He was emperor of Persia from 539-530 BC.
• Persia tended to be an enemy of the children of Israel.
• It's now called Iran.
• And continues to be an enemy of Israel.
• But Cyrus himself was not.
• God called Cyrus "my servant."
• And Cyrus followed through.
• Cyrus decreed that the Jewish exiles in Babylon could return to their homes and re-establish their country.
• He also allowed them to rebuild the temple.
• This was a big deal.
• Judah had been subjugated and exiled for 70 years.
• Their ability to worship disrupted by the destruction of their temple in Jerusalem.
• Yet here was Cyrus, who was not one of them, playing a major role in fostering the Jews' return home.
• Consider a recent headline: Bibi Heaps Praise on Trump, Compares to Persian King Cyrus the Great
• I do have a point.
• NeverTrumper Ben Howe has a book out called The Immoral Majority: Why Evangelicals Chose Political Power over Christian Values.
• Howe has been doing a lot of TV, MSNBC included, defending that incendiary title.
• I have not read the book.
• I've seen him defend, it including the title, which suggests it reflects what he really thinks.
• The thesis smears evangelicals.
• It's fair to say Donald Trump is not an evangelical.
• He's never been called one.
• And has not called himself one.
• Technically, he's Presbyterian.
• As a New York liberal for most of his life, he had no conservative credibility prior to 2016.
• Conservative evangelicals were very skeptical of him.
• And many did not support him in the 2016 primary.
• Initially, countless others thought his candidacy was Seinfeldian — about nothing.
• But by the time he won the Republican primary in 2016, a few things became clear.
• One: Donald Trump could win the presidency (though it looked unlikely).
• Two: He seemed to have grasped a fact that eluded Jeb Bush and John Kasich.
• Namely, that if you run as a Republican you shouldn't spend most of your time insulting Republicans.
• Not, at least, if you want them to v**e for you (or applaud your speeches).
• You should probably spend the bulk of your time articulating a positive conservative vision and lambasting the left's rage and socialism.
• Trump did that.
• His passion suggested he might actually put up a fight against the left.
• The worse they treated him, the more he seemed to be readying for a fight.
• Three: However flawed Trump might be.
• And he is.
• He was obviously better for the country and for evangelicals than any Democrat would be.
• Recall that Trump was running after eight years of President Obama.
• Those eight years saw the federal government attempt to force nuns, literally the Little Sisters of the Poor, to violate their consciences and fund birth control.
• Obama took them to court over that.
• The eight years of Obama saw activist l*****ts haul Christian cake bakers to court and destroy their livelihood.
• The eight years of Obama saw a very emboldened left vent its hatred for everyone to their right.
• And evangelicals knew we were in their crosshairs.
• They went after Christian-owned Hobby Lobby.
• They used our tax dollars to fund a******n.
• They made their disdain for our faith abundantly clear.
• The Democrats' 2016 appeal to us amounted to "V**e for us, you stupid, r****t, bucktoothed h**ers!"
• That's terrible marketing anywhere outside the New York Times newsroom.
• Their 2020 message is worse.
• They're pushing failed 19th-century socialism paired with anti-Semitism (while calling us "r****t").
• Along with the policy plan that just finished k*****g Venezuela.
• They want to erase our borders.
• And take away our guns.
• They'll betray Israel at the first opportunity.
• Remember — Rep. Eric Swalwell (D) threatened to nuke gun owners!
• Plus: they still h**e evangelicals.
• And want us to pay for a******n on demand.
• Hillary Clinton did not offer a break from any of that.
• She called us "deplorable."
• And relished cranking Obama's hostility up a notch.
• That's not a good look.
• Ditto for the NeverTrumpers.
• Facepalm.
• Stupid.
• So, Trump emerged as a kind of Cyrus figure.
• Not necessarily "one of us."
• But not someone who would not go out of his way to smear or hurt us either.
• Somebody might misread that previous line, so as Obama would say, let me be clear.
• Trump would be benign toward evangelicals.
• And might even be helpful, as Cyrus was helpful toward Israel.
• The previous is not meant to suggest Trump would literally become an emperor.
• We're not interested in that.
• Speaking for many evangelicals, Trump earned our v**es by articulating many of our ideals fearlessly.
• This suggested he might actually follow through, unlike many who have called themselves "conservative" for their entire lives but "grow" left once they get to Washington.
• If we got some policy wins out of him, all the better.
• Trump has been strongly pro-life.
• Strongly pro-American.
• Strongly pro-Israel.
• Strongly pro-capitalism.
• And he has pushed back against the freedom-robbing regulatory state.
• He cut taxes.
• And he left evangelicals alone.
• He didn't sue the nuns.
• He doesn't want our guns.
• V****g for Trump is not "trading Christian values for political power."
• It's v****g in self-defense against the radical, evangelical-hating left.
• And hoping for the best.
• And getting more than expected.
b Mystery Solved: Why Evangelicals Support Trump ... (show quote)


AWESOME, TERRIFIC article, Parky!! Thanks for sharing

Reply
Aug 25, 2019 22:54:16   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Lonewolf wrote:
No Christian could support trump I watched you republican Christians let Mitch Romney lead you in prayer to the Mormon God!
Apparently you don't know what god the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Days Saints worship.

In the gospels of Matthew (26:33-35), Mark (14:29-31), Luke (22:33-34), and John (13:36-38), when Jesus was arrested, his disciple Peter denied him three times, said he didn't know him. At the Last Supper, Jesus told Peter he would do so.

At the DNC convention in September 2012, when v****g on the motion to accept Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel and to include God in the democratic party platform, the majority of the delegates v**ed "NO". The v**e was too close, so Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa had to request a second v**e. Again the majority v**ed "NO". Villaraigosa tried one more time. The v**e was a resounding "NO". Three times, wolfy, the democrats denied God. However, Villaraigosa rejected the v**e and proclaimed the resolution passed. He received a majority of BOOs. And, the democrat leaders had to scramble to recover the confidence of the delegates. They failed. Today, what was once the democratic party is now the Progressive Movement, which, FYI, is unabashedly Atheist.

Reply
Aug 25, 2019 23:36:58   #
debeda
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Apparently you don't know what god the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Days Saints worship.

In the gospels of Matthew (26:33-35), Mark (14:29-31), Luke (22:33-34), and John (13:36-38), when Jesus was arrested, his disciple Peter denied him three times, said he didn't know him. At the Last Supper, Jesus told Peter he would do so.

At the DNC convention in September 2012, when v****g on the motion to accept Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel and to include God in the democratic party platform, the majority of the delegates v**ed "NO". The v**e was too close, so Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa had to request a second v**e. Again the majority v**ed "NO". Villaraigosa tried one more time. The v**e was a resounding "NO". Three times, wolfy, the democrats denied God. However, Villaraigosa rejected the v**e and proclaimed the resolution passed. He received a majority of BOOs. And, the democrat leaders had to scramble to recover the confidence of the delegates. They failed. Today, what was once the democratic party is now the Progressive Movement, which, FYI, is unabashedly Atheist.
Apparently you don't know what god the Church of ... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Aug 25, 2019 23:42:52   #
Fodaoson Loc: South Texas
 
The Democrats have left the road to the left. The Republicans have veered to the right. Both parties are in the ditch not driving on the road. Where does that leave John Q Public? Neither party is worthy of his v**e.
40% of the eligible v**ers do not v**e. Many v**ers v**ed against a candidate rather than for one. The problem with that is that neither candidate is wanted so the e******n elects an unpopular candidate. It is not just in the P**********l e******n but down the b****t.

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 01:58:27   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Fodaoson wrote:
The Democrats have left the road to the left. The Republicans have veered to the right. Both parties are in the ditch not driving on the road. Where does that leave John Q Public? Neither party is worthy of his v**e.
40% of the eligible v**ers do not v**e. Many v**ers v**ed against a candidate rather than for one. The problem with that is that neither candidate is wanted so the e******n elects an unpopular candidate. It is not just in the P**********l e******n but down the b****t.
This is not relevant to the topic.

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 06:00:44   #
Tug484
 
Rose42 wrote:
Wrong again. At least you know how to spell Christian but you don't know what they're about.

They do h**e - they h**e sin. They don't h**e homosexuals or anyone else as the alt left loves to claim. Of course the left h**es Christianity and never do you see them make that complaint about muslims - you included. Christians could be democrats but they would not support a******n, or the g****r madness that the democrat party supports - especially directed at children. That is sick.

You always claim its the right that h**es - again you are wrong. The left's hatred manifests itself in many ways and one important one in particular - its championing of 2000 innocent lives k**led every day. That's depravity.
Wrong again. At least you know how to spell Chris... (show quote)

Right.
We don't h**e the sinner. We h**e the sin.
Bible clearly calls it sin.

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 06:03:50   #
tophat
 
Lonewolf wrote:
No Christian could support trump I watched you republican Christians let Mitch Romney lead you in prayer to the Mormon God!


WHO?

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2019 06:05:27   #
tophat
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Your party is in control stop k*****g them


In case you haven't noticed!

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 06:11:05   #
tophat
 
tommsteyer wrote:
Trump made e******n promises. He kept more of them than maybe his forerunners.

If President Trump could be defeated on character he would never have been elected.
Because career politicians polish their optics all their life to win on future projections of past deeds.

But none of the Dem Candid8s have any fire. just dusty brimstone and fiery denunciations.

OK so you all h**e trump. Yawn.

You should be elected because (howl) Russian conspiracy that even his worst enemies can't invent good enough or find proof of. And oh how they tried.

Then its all about obstruction. Hooboy. Mueller was the ex lax that had no smooth moves.

When did Trump hire anybody to halt the Mueller investigation? never. and he could have.

a campaign of witch hunting by Comey. From Obama's administration on down. Comey lied about it. To the President of the United States.

Why isn't Comey on trial for obstruction and conspiracy?

ok ( deep breath),now we move on to r****m.
The identity politix party forms a quartet of nonwhite women who start bonfire after bonfire in the press. Pressley calls Trump a mofo to a crowd of ecstatic followers.

Ah civility. I guess those people getting all high and mighty about Trump's Tweeting style look pretty stupid right then.

AOc capitalizes on her newfound fame by cementing her e******n with a steadily growing record of
responsible performance, cultivating the respect of--...

Oh sorry. AOC wastes the frosh currency (and her notoriety.) on skipping out on hearings for her surprisingly senior appointments.

And then AOC fronts female leadership iconography to the media. finger points her way on to every screen in America. Her face is in updates ads and features daily.

Them Omar teases her way into international discourse, peppering her frosh career with overlooked pro-Palestinian remarks.

And her play is enacted using media support for her obvious anti trump sentiment. The press touts Omar and Tlaib's remarks without a common sense filter.
With an eagerly anti Trump media at the ready to garner her free publicity ,
Omar drives the nail into Israel deeper and deeper.
The media complies with blanket fawning coverage. Questions about her past are swatted away.
The press converge on Omar as a praiseworthy zealot of color, without editorial consideration of the consequences.
Then Omar pulls a stunt meant to confound the peace process Obama won a medal for.

That's patriotism for ya. And the media follows this fiddler with baited breath. never thinking where her actions will lead.

When has any party allowed such a runaway tear of freshman recklessness, except by design.

To mask the complete inadequacy of any of the potential candidates. sonething must be done.
The show runners within the Dem Party created a big distraction to fool the public.

Since the candidates have little to say, they needed some hell raisers to engage the President. So the news cycles wouldn't research the candidates and plot their missteps Knowledgably.

and to keep the media churning free anti Trump publicity.

So all this hand waving is broadcast with a chorus of anti Trump wah-wah from the candidates in the background.
Using President Trump's remarks said in response to everything from concentration camps and gun control, the media has printed more f**e news.

Snd given those worthless i***ts on stage some index cards to read from.


Am I the only one wondering who the shadow king is? The one orchestrating the Comey debacle? surely that i***t didn't come up with all that activity on his own.

The shadow king who brought Epstein into the news after more than a decade of similar behavior. Suddenly there is video if Trump and Epstein at a party.

iT takes the media three seconds to link Trump with the behavior Epstein was guilty of.

Out of all the special victims cases in the United States, why was there such a rush to justice on this one? Maybe the public needed to see a molester tried to suggest that Trump was right in there too.

Maybe punch up credibility for all those gold diggers trying to chisel money off Trump?

Bring Stormy tearfully back into the limelight?
after all . Avenatti would pull those kinds of levers if it would make Stormy some money. To which he would claim the right. As part of their agreement for his legal services.

The public was already seeing the media make the connection and suggest Trump was a mirror image of
Epstein.

One problem: That would make former President Clinton 24 times as guilty. As Epstein. But then Epstein tidily does away with himself before he can do a plea agreement.

Keeping Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton and Kevin Spacey...free of the pokey.

McCabe and Strozck and Brennan and all these others acting in concert by sheer coincidence?

and Mueller looks like an Alzheimer's commercial and and the guy looking into Clinton Foundation shoots himself inside a bar?

Coincidence?

And don't forget to mention Don
Lemon 's Teflon immunity after concrete accusations of secual assault?

While a guy who breathed the same space as Epstein's prosecuting attorneys has to step down from a cabinet position after whispers of POSSIBLE wrongdoing?

Someone is running this pinata party.

If we had real journalists around they'd be looking for who it could be.
Trump made e******n promises. He kept more of them... (show quote)


Thanks T. great post!

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 09:57:42   #
PZG1225 Loc: Florida
 
Parky60 wrote:
Mystery Solved: Why Evangelicals Support Trump
Bryan Preston August 21, 2019
• Why do evangelical Christians support President Trump?
• What's the appeal?
• To people who profess family values.
• Of a man whose life includes multiple marriages and affairs.
• And who tends to be crude?
• Let's dive into this alleged mystery.
• Turn with me if you will to the book of Isaiah, chapter 45.
• We come to the story of Cyrus the Great.
• He was not a king of Israel or Judah.
• He was emperor of Persia from 539-530 BC.
• Persia tended to be an enemy of the children of Israel.
• It's now called Iran.
• And continues to be an enemy of Israel.
• But Cyrus himself was not.
• God called Cyrus "my servant."
• And Cyrus followed through.
• Cyrus decreed that the Jewish exiles in Babylon could return to their homes and re-establish their country.
• He also allowed them to rebuild the temple.
• This was a big deal.
• Judah had been subjugated and exiled for 70 years.
• Their ability to worship disrupted by the destruction of their temple in Jerusalem.
• Yet here was Cyrus, who was not one of them, playing a major role in fostering the Jews' return home.
• Consider a recent headline: Bibi Heaps Praise on Trump, Compares to Persian King Cyrus the Great
• I do have a point.
• NeverTrumper Ben Howe has a book out called The Immoral Majority: Why Evangelicals Chose Political Power over Christian Values.
• Howe has been doing a lot of TV, MSNBC included, defending that incendiary title.
• I have not read the book.
• I've seen him defend, it including the title, which suggests it reflects what he really thinks.
• The thesis smears evangelicals.
• It's fair to say Donald Trump is not an evangelical.
• He's never been called one.
• And has not called himself one.
• Technically, he's Presbyterian.
• As a New York liberal for most of his life, he had no conservative credibility prior to 2016.
• Conservative evangelicals were very skeptical of him.
• And many did not support him in the 2016 primary.
• Initially, countless others thought his candidacy was Seinfeldian — about nothing.
• But by the time he won the Republican primary in 2016, a few things became clear.
• One: Donald Trump could win the presidency (though it looked unlikely).
• Two: He seemed to have grasped a fact that eluded Jeb Bush and John Kasich.
• Namely, that if you run as a Republican you shouldn't spend most of your time insulting Republicans.
• Not, at least, if you want them to v**e for you (or applaud your speeches).
• You should probably spend the bulk of your time articulating a positive conservative vision and lambasting the left's rage and socialism.
• Trump did that.
• His passion suggested he might actually put up a fight against the left.
• The worse they treated him, the more he seemed to be readying for a fight.
• Three: However flawed Trump might be.
• And he is.
• He was obviously better for the country and for evangelicals than any Democrat would be.
• Recall that Trump was running after eight years of President Obama.
• Those eight years saw the federal government attempt to force nuns, literally the Little Sisters of the Poor, to violate their consciences and fund birth control.
• Obama took them to court over that.
• The eight years of Obama saw activist l*****ts haul Christian cake bakers to court and destroy their livelihood.
• The eight years of Obama saw a very emboldened left vent its hatred for everyone to their right.
• And evangelicals knew we were in their crosshairs.
• They went after Christian-owned Hobby Lobby.
• They used our tax dollars to fund a******n.
• They made their disdain for our faith abundantly clear.
• The Democrats' 2016 appeal to us amounted to "V**e for us, you stupid, r****t, bucktoothed h**ers!"
• That's terrible marketing anywhere outside the New York Times newsroom.
• Their 2020 message is worse.
• They're pushing failed 19th-century socialism paired with anti-Semitism (while calling us "r****t").
• Along with the policy plan that just finished k*****g Venezuela.
• They want to erase our borders.
• And take away our guns.
• They'll betray Israel at the first opportunity.
• Remember — Rep. Eric Swalwell (D) threatened to nuke gun owners!
• Plus: they still h**e evangelicals.
• And want us to pay for a******n on demand.
• Hillary Clinton did not offer a break from any of that.
• She called us "deplorable."
• And relished cranking Obama's hostility up a notch.
• That's not a good look.
• Ditto for the NeverTrumpers.
• Facepalm.
• Stupid.
• So, Trump emerged as a kind of Cyrus figure.
• Not necessarily "one of us."
• But not someone who would not go out of his way to smear or hurt us either.
• Somebody might misread that previous line, so as Obama would say, let me be clear.
• Trump would be benign toward evangelicals.
• And might even be helpful, as Cyrus was helpful toward Israel.
• The previous is not meant to suggest Trump would literally become an emperor.
• We're not interested in that.
• Speaking for many evangelicals, Trump earned our v**es by articulating many of our ideals fearlessly.
• This suggested he might actually follow through, unlike many who have called themselves "conservative" for their entire lives but "grow" left once they get to Washington.
• If we got some policy wins out of him, all the better.
• Trump has been strongly pro-life.
• Strongly pro-American.
• Strongly pro-Israel.
• Strongly pro-capitalism.
• And he has pushed back against the freedom-robbing regulatory state.
• He cut taxes.
• And he left evangelicals alone.
• He didn't sue the nuns.
• He doesn't want our guns.
• V****g for Trump is not "trading Christian values for political power."
• It's v****g in self-defense against the radical, evangelical-hating left.
• And hoping for the best.
• And getting more than expected.
b Mystery Solved: Why Evangelicals Support Trump ... (show quote)



You get the prize for "Best Post of the Year" Parky! LOVED IT!!!

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 10:01:24   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2016/02/29/pieper-and-henderson-10-reasons-you-cant-be-a-christian-and-v**e-for-donald-trump

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.