"In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the p**********l race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every p**********l race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen a reason to alter our approach. Until now."

The Editorial Board has never taken sides in the p**********l race. We're doing it now. Trump is unfit for the presidency...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-v**e-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/?fbclid=IwAR1ZlRuM7Q035QzV_pc1qWcuhB_cl74oBCzNO6lt-Km_Ung5PUUxvWzta1s

My god, the ole good vs e-vile ploy and you think Trump is good! I guess that makes you good too and any and any and all cons who gave up their moral values all for the political expediency of making him their president

Remember Bill Clinton? A womanizer who only cared about being serviced by women and didn't give a fuk about the damage he did. You impeached him simply because he lied about getting a blow job! Now along comes Trump and you have a man who c***ted on all of his wives and is totally unapologetic about it; is on tape bragging about what women let him do to him simply because he's famous; paid off not one but two women he hooked up with because Melania couldn't put out for him while pregnant--as if he needed any excuse to c***t on his wife's.

And that's just the start--he c***ted banks, his vendors, his employees, and anyone who was stupid enough to put their trust in him. Hell, when asked prior to the e******n whether he had ever repented he said he didn't have anything to repent for. Now mind you this is a man who c***ted banks, vendors, his employees; c***ted on all three of his wives; paid off Playboy models and porn stars simply to keep their mouths shut because he didn't want them to cost him the e******n and on and on and on.

Now my point in all this is that you had no problem persecuting Clinton for faults that didn't even come close to measuring to the sins Trump has committed but you totally looked the other way with Trump simply because it was to your political benefit to do so. I h**e to break it to you but I don't think that is something that your god would smile upon.

So good vs evil? God vs Satan? Your argument seems to be that god chose Trump even though he was unrepentant and saw nothing that he ever did as a sin? And he sees you as good even though your values are relative depending on whether they are to your political benefit or not. Is that the way you think good vs evil stacks up? Careful, cuz it sounds like to me that you sided with Satan simply because he could give you all the political goodies that your heart desires...

And, as Trump announced yesterday, "I am the Chosen One!"

"In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the p**********l race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every p**********l race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen a reason to alter our approach. Until now."

The Editorial Board has never taken sides in the p**********l race. We're doing it now. Trump is unfit for the presidency...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-v**e-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/?fbclid=IwAR1ZlRuM7Q035QzV_pc1qWcuhB_cl74oBCzNO6lt-Km_Ung5PUUxvWzta1s