Sew_What

Any questions?

ImLogicallyRight

About what. You spout something with no references and we are supposed to believe you and comment.

Sew_What

Most people would just google it, but I'll help you out because this must be your first rodeo:

Ellen Weintraub, the chairwoman of the Federal E******n Commission, on Monday rebuked President Donald Trump’s repeated allegations of widespread v***r f***d in the 2016 e******n as “damaging to our democracy” and wholly unsubstantiated.

“There is no evidence of rampant v***r f***d in 2016 or really in any previous e******n,” Weintraub, a Democrat, told CNN.


“People have studied this. Academics have studied this. Lawyers have studied this. The government has studied this. Democrats have studied this. Republicans have studied this,” she continued. “And no one can find any evidence of rampant v***r f***d either historically or particularly in the 2016 e******ns.”

The White House did not immediately return an email seeking a response to Weintraub's remarks.

Trump on Thursday asserted at a rally in New Hampshire that v***r f***d is the reason he lost the Granite State’s four e*******l v**es in the previous p**********l e******n. He told supporters at an arena in Manchester, "It was taken away from us."

In a letter to Trump on Friday, Weintraub challenged Trump “to provide any evidence” that could back up those statements. “To put it in terms a former casino operator should understand: There comes a time when you need to lay your cards on the table or fold,” she wrote.

The president on Sunday reiterated his unfounded claims, telling reporters in New Jersey that “many, many people v**ed that shouldn't have been v**ed,” and insisting “some people v**ed many times.”

"Facts matter. And people of America need to be able to believe what their leaders tell them,” Weintraub said Monday.

Lonewolf

Kevyn

She very eloquently stuffed a sock in the I***t Pumpkinfuhrer’s pie hole! You can bet the farm that the Orange Anus will NEVER provide the evidence to support his lie, because the evidence doesn't exist. All he wants to do is destroy Americans faith in our e*******l system.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

What she said is 'There is no evidence of rampant v***r f***d.' This is not the same as there is no v***r f***d. Indeed, her words acknowledges that she knows there has been v***r f***d, just not in all 50 states so it, for now, is not spreading. She goes on to say, "we really need to be taking action."

One wonders, if all states had cooperated with the investigation into v***r f***d, what would have been found.....would we still need this conversation?

Sew_What

1. The v***r f***d that has any impact on anything, is the way, the DNC selects their candidates during the primaries, in as such as to how they promote a candidate that has not been legitimately selected.

2. And the way most states issue driver's licenses, only recently started including proof of citizenship.

Rampant or otherwise, proof of citizenship isn't required to do many things and yet states are requiring people to show a driver's license that would pass to even get a passport.

Pat Riot

[quote=Sew_What]"Most people would just google it, but I'll help you out because this must be your first rodeo:

Ellen Weintraub, the chairwoman of the Federal E******n Commission, on Monday rebuked President Donald Trump’s repeated allegations of widespread v***r f***d in the 2016 e******n as “damaging to our democracy” and wholly unsubstantiated.

“There is no evidence of rampant v***r f***d in 2016 or really in any previous e******n,” Weintraub, a Democrat, told CNN."

Surprise surprise! Ellen Weintraub is a Democrat! Why do you libtards continue to believe f**e news, 1st rodeo boy? Did you ever consider that public officials can use "weasel words" to deceive the public? Deceivers are LIARS! Notice how conveniently the word, "rampant" was inserted in Weintraub's diatribe. Now ponder the FACT that DOZENS of counties in the U.S. reported incredulous v****g results in the 2016 (and many other) e******ns, whereby more v**es were counted than were registered v**ers. Hmm...
Next, put everything in context and suddenly you'll understand that massive v***r f***d exists and by saying "rampant", one is merely camouf**ging the facts.
Finally, why do you suppose that so many states resisted working with the Federal government regarding v**er rolls by refusing to compare registered v**ers? It wasn't to "protect" anyone's privacy. It was flat out protection of obvious v***r f***d. Same reason rational & sane citizens can't get v**er ID laws passed.
Democrats are Demonrats! Educate yourself & get woke on this issue!

woodguru

She in effect told him to STFU if he couldn't provide proof, which he obviously can't since his waste of time commission couldn't find anything. Even after the commission manafed to remove the "partisan biased" deep state from the commission the partisan players had to say they could find no proof.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/457942-fec-chairwoman-to-trump-there-is-no-evidence-of-rampant-v**er-fraud

Sew_What

[quote=Pat R**t]

Okay, so you must have evidence to the contrary.

What about the then AG in Georgia that kicked a bunch of v**ers off the v****g who is now Governor. There wasn't any reason to that, and he was a Republican.

Kevyn

[quote=Pat R**t]

If this is the case your illustrious Pumpkinfuhrer will cough up the evidence to support his ridiculous claims. If the fraud he claims is actually going on it is his sworn duty to bring it to an end. It is time for the Orange Anus to put up or shut up.

woodguru

Actually for slower people, she is specifically talking about Trump's claim that there were millions of undocumented people v****g. No, there was not, and he commissioned a task force to identify it, which they were unable to do.

No evidence of something carries far more weight than the rhetorical no evidence there wasn't, that is a fool's position as proof of an absence is far harder to come by than proof of a deed.

woodguru

Not to mention standard protocol would be to resign his position in charge of e******ns as soon as he announced his run.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

If what you say in point 1 is correct, what manner of system do you propose as its replacement?


Proof of citizenship is not a requirement in any state as far as I can find to obtain a driver's license. As long as the individual can show they are legally in the country, be at minimum age, pass the exam, and have proof of insurance anyone can be licensed to drive. Obtaining a passport is Federally run, not state and to obtain a passport, one needs to present a birth certificate with a "raised seal." A driver's licence is not required to obtain a passport.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Not exactly, both Weintraub and President Trump were talking about New Hampshire. The investigation was closed because certain states (mostly those who are primarily Socialist) filed law suites to stop the investigation while other states refused full cooperation.