One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 18, 2019 10:05:08   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun


As if there could be any more reasons for gun owners not to travel to New Jersey, the state’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed four new gun control measures into law, including one requiring firearms dealers to sell at least one smart gun.

Smart guns – still in the prototype stage – require fingerprint authentication to be operated, much like a smartphone.

“This is a backdoor attempt to achieve the goal of pricing-out law-abiding gun owners,” Cody McLaughlin, a gun rights activist and contributor to the NRA’s H****rs’ Leadership Forum, told Gunpowder Magazine in an email statement.

“The liberal, anti-gun element in New Jersey figured out they were too ambitious with the original smart gun mandate law and that it delayed development of them, so they softened it in order to spur more working prototypes,” McLaughlin said. “Once a ‘viable’ one hits the market, I guarantee you the ban on non-smart devices will be reinstated, and the average blue collar worker won't be able to afford a several-thousand-dollar weapon and voila. Shadow ban achieved.”

Smartening Up In Jersey?
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law mandating the sale of smart guns once they became marketable anywhere in the country. Gun rights groups, however, successfully lobbied against the law because of the negative impact it would have on small-time firearm dealers.

Smart guns, which are largely still manufactured in prototype forms, are relatively cheap right now. One can be purchased on eBay for less than $100. But, once they hit the market, analysts expect them to retail for more than $1,000.

The NRA has lobbied extensively against smart guns, arguing that they give gun control advocates a way to mandate purchasing one type of firearm over another.

“[Smart guns] are just another way to shrink the pool of gun owners and limit people's rights until gun ownership is such a minority right that it is easy to just swipe it off the board entirely,” McLaughlin said.

Other Bills on the Docket
New Jersey’s new gun laws come almost one year to the day after Gov. Murphy signed six gun control laws in an effort to make the state a leader in “common sense” gun reform. Those laws include reducing magazine capacities, outlawing armor-piercing bullets, and expanding background checks.

Along with mandating the sale of smart guns, Murphy is also considering signing bills that would create firearm storage requirements, require firearm owners to renew their identification cards every four years, and require businesses that sell ammunition to track their sales and report them to local police precincts.

“Every single one of those bills is blatant bullying and scapegoating of law-abiding gun owners,” McLaughlin said. “We all want to reduce violent crime – but when has putting the onus on John Q Public, who has never hurt anyone in his life, but likes target shooting on Tuesdays or pheasant hunting before work in the fall, ever reduced violent crime? We need to make the hard, unpopular call and go after the criminals.”

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 10:38:43   #
Kevyn
 
MR Mister wrote:
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun


As if there could be any more reasons for gun owners not to travel to New Jersey, the state’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed four new gun control measures into law, including one requiring firearms dealers to sell at least one smart gun.

Smart guns – still in the prototype stage – require fingerprint authentication to be operated, much like a smartphone.

“This is a backdoor attempt to achieve the goal of pricing-out law-abiding gun owners,” Cody McLaughlin, a gun rights activist and contributor to the NRA’s H****rs’ Leadership Forum, told Gunpowder Magazine in an email statement.

“The liberal, anti-gun element in New Jersey figured out they were too ambitious with the original smart gun mandate law and that it delayed development of them, so they softened it in order to spur more working prototypes,” McLaughlin said. “Once a ‘viable’ one hits the market, I guarantee you the ban on non-smart devices will be reinstated, and the average blue collar worker won't be able to afford a several-thousand-dollar weapon and voila. Shadow ban achieved.”

Smartening Up In Jersey?
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law mandating the sale of smart guns once they became marketable anywhere in the country. Gun rights groups, however, successfully lobbied against the law because of the negative impact it would have on small-time firearm dealers.

Smart guns, which are largely still manufactured in prototype forms, are relatively cheap right now. One can be purchased on eBay for less than $100. But, once they hit the market, analysts expect them to retail for more than $1,000.

The NRA has lobbied extensively against smart guns, arguing that they give gun control advocates a way to mandate purchasing one type of firearm over another.

“[Smart guns] are just another way to shrink the pool of gun owners and limit people's rights until gun ownership is such a minority right that it is easy to just swipe it off the board entirely,” McLaughlin said.

Other Bills on the Docket
New Jersey’s new gun laws come almost one year to the day after Gov. Murphy signed six gun control laws in an effort to make the state a leader in “common sense” gun reform. Those laws include reducing magazine capacities, outlawing armor-piercing bullets, and expanding background checks.

Along with mandating the sale of smart guns, Murphy is also considering signing bills that would create firearm storage requirements, require firearm owners to renew their identification cards every four years, and require businesses that sell ammunition to track their sales and report them to local police precincts.

“Every single one of those bills is blatant bullying and scapegoating of law-abiding gun owners,” McLaughlin said. “We all want to reduce violent crime – but when has putting the onus on John Q Public, who has never hurt anyone in his life, but likes target shooting on Tuesdays or pheasant hunting before work in the fall, ever reduced violent crime? We need to make the hard, unpopular call and go after the criminals.”
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun br br br As... (show quote)


Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea. Restricting high capacity magazines, armor piercing ammunition and requiring firearms be securely stored in no way effects your hypothetical pheasant h****r or target shooter. And are all measures most Americans stand behind.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 10:47:05   #
son of witless
 
Kevyn wrote:
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea. Restricting high capacity magazines, armor piercing ammunition and requiring firearms be securely stored in no way effects your hypothetical pheasant h****r or target shooter. And are all measures most Americans stand behind.
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone... (show quote)


Newsflash. You ain't most Americans. End of STORY.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 10:59:59   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Kevyn wrote:
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea. Restricting high capacity magazines, armor piercing ammunition and requiring firearms be securely stored in no way effects your hypothetical pheasant h****r or target shooter. And are all measures most Americans stand behind.
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone... (show quote)


New Jersey is stopping most everyone from owning just a gun. That fact is a violation of the 2nd amendment. Nothing to do with armor-piercing anything. New Jersey is the Garden of Eden to you c****es. It's the land you want to see from sea to shining sea. Only ignorant people like you keep
the C****e party alive.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:04:58   #
bahmer
 
MR Mister wrote:
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun


As if there could be any more reasons for gun owners not to travel to New Jersey, the state’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed four new gun control measures into law, including one requiring firearms dealers to sell at least one smart gun.

Smart guns – still in the prototype stage – require fingerprint authentication to be operated, much like a smartphone.

“This is a backdoor attempt to achieve the goal of pricing-out law-abiding gun owners,” Cody McLaughlin, a gun rights activist and contributor to the NRA’s H****rs’ Leadership Forum, told Gunpowder Magazine in an email statement.

“The liberal, anti-gun element in New Jersey figured out they were too ambitious with the original smart gun mandate law and that it delayed development of them, so they softened it in order to spur more working prototypes,” McLaughlin said. “Once a ‘viable’ one hits the market, I guarantee you the ban on non-smart devices will be reinstated, and the average blue collar worker won't be able to afford a several-thousand-dollar weapon and voila. Shadow ban achieved.”

Smartening Up In Jersey?
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law mandating the sale of smart guns once they became marketable anywhere in the country. Gun rights groups, however, successfully lobbied against the law because of the negative impact it would have on small-time firearm dealers.

Smart guns, which are largely still manufactured in prototype forms, are relatively cheap right now. One can be purchased on eBay for less than $100. But, once they hit the market, analysts expect them to retail for more than $1,000.

The NRA has lobbied extensively against smart guns, arguing that they give gun control advocates a way to mandate purchasing one type of firearm over another.

“[Smart guns] are just another way to shrink the pool of gun owners and limit people's rights until gun ownership is such a minority right that it is easy to just swipe it off the board entirely,” McLaughlin said.

Other Bills on the Docket
New Jersey’s new gun laws come almost one year to the day after Gov. Murphy signed six gun control laws in an effort to make the state a leader in “common sense” gun reform. Those laws include reducing magazine capacities, outlawing armor-piercing bullets, and expanding background checks.

Along with mandating the sale of smart guns, Murphy is also considering signing bills that would create firearm storage requirements, require firearm owners to renew their identification cards every four years, and require businesses that sell ammunition to track their sales and report them to local police precincts.

“Every single one of those bills is blatant bullying and scapegoating of law-abiding gun owners,” McLaughlin said. “We all want to reduce violent crime – but when has putting the onus on John Q Public, who has never hurt anyone in his life, but likes target shooting on Tuesdays or pheasant hunting before work in the fall, ever reduced violent crime? We need to make the hard, unpopular call and go after the criminals.”
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun br br br As... (show quote)


The liberals are after one thing and that is getting rid of all firearms which is basically getting rid of the second amendment and then they will go for a dictatorship that will give them perpetual power.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:06:54   #
Rose42
 
bahmer wrote:
The liberals are after one thing and that is getting rid of all firearms which is basically getting rid of the second amendment and then they will go for a dictatorship that will give them perpetual power.


Thats their end game. And look how normally rational people fall right in line with their agenda.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:14:11   #
Lonewolf
 
MR Mister wrote:
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun


As if there could be any more reasons for gun owners not to travel to New Jersey, the state’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed four new gun control measures into law, including one requiring firearms dealers to sell at least one smart gun.

Smart guns – still in the prototype stage – require fingerprint authentication to be operated, much like a smartphone.

“This is a backdoor attempt to achieve the goal of pricing-out law-abiding gun owners,” Cody McLaughlin, a gun rights activist and contributor to the NRA’s H****rs’ Leadership Forum, told Gunpowder Magazine in an email statement.

“The liberal, anti-gun element in New Jersey figured out they were too ambitious with the original smart gun mandate law and that it delayed development of them, so they softened it in order to spur more working prototypes,” McLaughlin said. “Once a ‘viable’ one hits the market, I guarantee you the ban on non-smart devices will be reinstated, and the average blue collar worker won't be able to afford a several-thousand-dollar weapon and voila. Shadow ban achieved.”

Smartening Up In Jersey?
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law mandating the sale of smart guns once they became marketable anywhere in the country. Gun rights groups, however, successfully lobbied against the law because of the negative impact it would have on small-time firearm dealers.

Smart guns, which are largely still manufactured in prototype forms, are relatively cheap right now. One can be purchased on eBay for less than $100. But, once they hit the market, analysts expect them to retail for more than $1,000.

The NRA has lobbied extensively against smart guns, arguing that they give gun control advocates a way to mandate purchasing one type of firearm over another.

“[Smart guns] are just another way to shrink the pool of gun owners and limit people's rights until gun ownership is such a minority right that it is easy to just swipe it off the board entirely,” McLaughlin said.

Other Bills on the Docket
New Jersey’s new gun laws come almost one year to the day after Gov. Murphy signed six gun control laws in an effort to make the state a leader in “common sense” gun reform. Those laws include reducing magazine capacities, outlawing armor-piercing bullets, and expanding background checks.

Along with mandating the sale of smart guns, Murphy is also considering signing bills that would create firearm storage requirements, require firearm owners to renew their identification cards every four years, and require businesses that sell ammunition to track their sales and report them to local police precincts.

“Every single one of those bills is blatant bullying and scapegoating of law-abiding gun owners,” McLaughlin said. “We all want to reduce violent crime – but when has putting the onus on John Q Public, who has never hurt anyone in his life, but likes target shooting on Tuesdays or pheasant hunting before work in the fall, ever reduced violent crime? We need to make the hard, unpopular call and go after the criminals.”
New Jersey Is Now Even MORE Anti-Gun br br br As... (show quote)


Sad part is all the bad guys going to do is laugh his ass off those laws don't effect him one bit! People need to stand up the sheriffs in upstate NY refuse to enforce the crazy gun laws that are passed in New York City. People should go to their mayors and demand that these laws not be enforced

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 11:26:26   #
Gatsby
 
Kevyn wrote:
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea. Restricting high capacity magazines, armor piercing ammunition and requiring firearms be securely stored in no way effects your hypothetical pheasant h****r or target shooter. And are all measures most Americans stand behind.
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone... (show quote)


DC's "secure storage" law was overturned by the SCOTUS.

Since there is no definition of "secure storage", any law so vague, would also be overturned.

Either say what you mean or STFU!

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:39:35   #
TrueAmerican
 
son of witless wrote:
Newsflash. You ain't most Americans. End of STORY.


Is he even American, I thought he was a Russian troll or bot !!!!!!

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:51:10   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
Kevyn wrote:
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea. Restricting high capacity magazines, armor piercing ammunition and requiring firearms be securely stored in no way effects your hypothetical pheasant h****r or target shooter. And are all measures most Americans stand behind.
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone... (show quote)


Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea.

I don't turn on my phone with a fingerprint or facial ID. And it isn't a requirement. H**e to think what would happen in an emergency if someone else needed to make a call on my phone. It is all just more infringement on our constitutional rights.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:12:19   #
Kevyn
 
Gatsby wrote:
DC's "secure storage" law was overturned by the SCOTUS.

Since there is no definition of "secure storage", any law so vague, would also be overturned.

Either say what you mean or STFU!


How is this the action of any firearm not in the immediate control of its owner will have a lock affixed through the action to render it unable to chamber or fire a round. Any firearm not stored in this manner shall be locked within a safe.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 12:24:15   #
Kevyn
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone with a fingerprint or facial ID and the same technology can be used o keep a child who finds a gun or a criminal who takes a gun from a cop from using it, you find this onerous, while most Americans will consider it a damn good idea.

I don't turn on my phone with a fingerprint or facial ID. And it isn't a requirement. H**e to think what would happen in an emergency if someone else needed to make a call on my phone. It is all just more infringement on our constitutional rights.
Let me get this straight, we turn on our telephone... (show quote)


The law doesn't compel all guns be equipped with this technology it simply requires firearm dealers to make the technology available so that those who want it can obtain it.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:40:26   #
Gatsby
 
Kevyn wrote:
How is this the action of any firearm not in the immediate control of its owner will have a lock affixed through the action to render it unable to chamber or fire a round. Any firearm not stored in this manner shall be locked within a safe.


" its owner will have a lock affixed through the action to render it unable to chamber or fire a round."

Any suck "lock" can be EASILY defeated with common household tools, most in matter of seconds.

Very useless in FACT. People have been "cracking" safes for as long as safes have existed.

A splendid little theory, until put into practice.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 16:10:48   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Kevyn wrote:
How is this the action of any firearm not in the immediate control of its owner will have a lock affixed through the action to render it unable to chamber or fire a round. Any firearm not stored in this manner shall be locked within a safe.


Your simple little mind can not fathom the fact of a gun is for protection, so if locked in a safe it's a moot point. I know this requires a lot of gray matter for you to understand. You should find any site to play on.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 18:22:52   #
son of witless
 
TrueAmerican wrote:
Is he even American, I thought he was a Russian troll or bot !!!!!!


Are you saying he is Kevanski ?

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.