Trump Says The Economy Will Go Down If He Loses...
woodguru wrote:
The guy just needs to STFU...he doesn't get the fact that he has most likely already tanked the economy, and he is too stupid to learn from his mistakes and tone it back, he needs to implement the time honored strategy of laying low for awhile and letting things settle down, his attack attack attack thing isn't going well. He's sounding like a whining little brat who isn't getting his way. Question for the right, have you ever liked a spoiled brat like this in real life? Why do you like this one?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/457633-trump-says-economy-will-go-down-the-tubes-if-he-losesThe guy just needs to STFU...he doesn't get the fa... (
show quote)
It will. We'll be taxed and regulated into the poor house.
Seth wrote:
This is true.
There was a time when politicians on both sides of the aisle valued a healthy economy with low unemployment.
Today the Democrats seem totally dedicated to the idea that high unemployment and a weak economy geared towards meeting the agendas of the g*******ts who support their campaigns is the way to go, and the Republicans don't have the spines or the resolve or are too afraid of being called names to do what Trump has done for the economy and the middle class.
This is true. br br There i was /i a time when ... (
show quote)
I think the keyword here is "g*******ts." While Trumpy takes credit for what is and has seemed an economic resurgence, it's not presidents or politicians that control an economy. For the last century or more, everything, whether the economy, war, you name it, is being done to advance the g*******t agenda.
Richard Rowland wrote:
I think the keyword here is "g*******ts." While Trumpy takes credit for what is and has seemed an economic resurgence, it's not presidents or politicians that control an economy. For the last century or more, everything, whether the economy, war, you name it, is being done to advance the g*******t agenda.
Trump's America First policies and the healthy economy resulting from his tax cuts, both if which gave been under attack by the Democratic Party since "Day 1," are strong resistance against g*******t agendas.
The Democrats, meanwhile, receive a ton of funding from George Soros, who has stated, and this was in an interview you can find on YouTube from a few years ago, that he wants to see the U.S. dollar devalued until it becomes a d**g on other currencies.
Their open borders and sanctuary cities policies, the destruction of historic monuments and other attempts to virtually erase our history, Obama's Paris Accords spawned regulations that drove so many jobs out of the country, the solid, unending campaign to alienate minorities by falsely branding the president and the Republicans as r****t, the thinly veiled war on Judeo-Christianity coinciding with bending over backwards to slavishly accommodate Islam, all these are more favorable to the ambitions of g*******ts than to a strong, united, sovereign America.
woodguru wrote:
The guy just needs to STFU...he doesn't get the fact that he has most likely already tanked the economy, and he is too stupid to learn from his mistakes and tone it back, he needs to implement the time honored strategy of laying low for awhile and letting things settle down, his attack attack attack thing isn't going well. He's sounding like a whining little brat who isn't getting his way. Question for the right, have you ever liked a spoiled brat like this in real life? Why do you like this one?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/457633-trump-says-economy-will-go-down-the-tubes-if-he-losesThe guy just needs to STFU...he doesn't get the fa... (
show quote)
Spoiled brat or not I believe he's correct. Every Democrat is talking about raising taxes. That's going to take money out of peoples pockets so they'll have less to spend which will lead to layoffs. All their 'free' stuff will have to be paid for by somebody. The Chinese are hoping for a Democrat to replace Trump because they can't sustain the hit on their economy from the tariffs. The Dem's environmentalist friends will stifle oil and gas production. And I could go on and on but you get my drift.
woodguru wrote:
All my predictions about him are coming true, we can go back if you want but it's a waste of time when it's more productive to talk about what's happening now. You let a gambler run the country, and I despise gamblers. A gambler is a loser.
Some jokester suggested to Trump that he buy Greenland, and Trump fell for it. Trump's been pestering his advisors about the possibilty; he's entirely serious. When word got out, and the Danish parliament got wind of it, hilarity ensued.
"Yup, like we're going to sell 50,000 Danish citizens to Trump!"
And now the whole world is laughing at that goofy dickhead in the WH.
kemmer wrote:
Some jokester suggested to Trump that he buy Greenland, and Trump fell for it. Trump's been pestering his advisors about the possibilty; he's entirely serious. When word got out, and the Danish parliament got wind of it, hilarity ensued.
"Yup, like we're going to sell 50,000 Danish citizens to Trump!"
And now the whole world is laughing at that goofy dickhead in the WH.
Yup, whenever Trump wants to have a little fun, all he has to do is tweet something in jest and he can rest assured that the Dems and the MSM will be steppin' and fetchin' like a bunch of clowns on meth.
woodguru wrote:
All my predictions about him are coming true, we can go back if you want but it's a waste of time when it's more productive to talk about what's happening now. You let a gambler run the country, and I despise gamblers. A gambler is a loser.
Uh, no they're not. I remember some that were way off.
You and the democrats have nothing to offer - absolutely nothing. "Not Trump" is nothing. Basically the country is in big trouble and the democrats have no one in line to fix anything. Not a single democrat candidate is worth v****g for and I would v**e democrat if there were one. They are all wretched. Yet here you are speaking as though you have something.
woodguru wrote:
Can you explain in intelligent terms what took place with Clinton and Obama where they reduced deficits and put on jobs...while Bush and now Trump cut taxes and increase spending? I haven't seen anyone on the right explain this, but you can try.
My main concern is if Trump is reelected That he will go after Social Security and Medicare The GOP call them entitlements but when you pay into something your whole life its not a entitlement
Seth wrote:
Yup, whenever Trump wants to have a little fun, all he has to do is tweet something in jest and he can rest assured that the Dems and the MSM will be steppin' and fetchin' like a bunch of clowns on meth.
Sometimes it's almost appalling how Trump's little people will unquestioningly defend his daily outrages and boorish behavior as though they were somehow divinely inspired.
jimpack123 wrote:
My main concern is if Trump is reelected That he will go after Social Security and Medicare The GOP call them entitlements but when you pay into something your whole life its not a entitlement
The GOP calls them entitlements? Why be so partisan? All of those DC bloodsuckers call them entitlements. Let's be fair here!
They all look at my paycheck as an entitlement for them!
kemmer wrote:
Sometimes it's almost appalling how Trump's little people will unquestioningly defend his daily outrages and boorish behavior as though they were somehow divinely inspired.
Maybe Trump has a sense of humor, and enjoys trolling you sky screamers.
archie bunker wrote:
The GOP calls them entitlements? Why be so partisan? All of those DC bloodsuckers call them entitlements. Let's be fair here!
They all look at my paycheck as an entitlement for them!
Archie I agree with you on that one. lol
jimpack123 wrote:
My main concern is if Trump is reelected That he will go after Social Security and Medicare The GOP call them entitlements but when you pay into something your whole life its not a entitlement
There is also Social Security disability, and that's highly abused as well as the more likely target of any conservative agenda.
In California, there are veritable legions of young people who don't even know what a W-2 looks like, collecting SSI and SSD for conditions, many fraudulently, that aren't even disabilities, and the social(ist) services system here hands it out like Monopoly money so these parasites can spend the taxpayers' money on meth, weed and booze and sleep on the streets.
If they can't be indoctrinated in college, destruction of American youth seems to be you l*****ts' fallback plan.
As far as that which us old geezers have been paying into for decades, that's safe -- the only way they could cut it off is by doing so for young people who haven't yet paid into the "system."
There's more humanitarianism in Trump's left pinky than there is in the sum total of every Democrat in America.
Concern for
any group of people by Democrats is nothing but an illusion used as a tool to pursue a political agenda.
You know it and I know it. If you
don't know it, you are really obtuse.
Seth wrote:
There is also Social Security disability, and that's highly abused as well as the more likely target of any conservative agenda.
In California, there are veritable legions of young people who don't even know what a W-2 looks like, collecting SSI and SSD for conditions, many fraudulently, that aren't even disabilities, and the social(ist) services system here hands it out like Monopoly money so these parasites can spend the taxpayers' money on meth, weed and booze and sleep on the streets.
If they can't be indoctrinated in college, destruction of American youth seems to be you l*****ts' fallback plan.
As far as that which us old geezers have been paying into for decades, that's safe -- the only way they could cut it off is by doing so for young people who haven't yet paid into the "system."
There's more humanitarianism in Trump's left pinky than there is in the sum total of every Democrat in America.
Concern for any group of people by Democrats is nothing but an illusion used as a tool to pursue a political agenda.
You know it and I know it. If you don't know it, you are really obtuse.
There is also Social Security disability, and that... (
show quote)
Social Security Disability is needed but should be scrutinized better. There are people who are disabled from birth , disabled from work, and ones who aren't disabled unfortionly
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.