ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

A Google whistleblower has gone public with claims of e******n manipulation and political bias, according to investigative journalism group Project Veritas, which posted a trove of over 950 documents provided by Google insider Zachary Vorhies, who says he has come forward because he “saw something dark and nefarious going on with the company and I realized that they were going to not only tamper with the e******ns, but use that tampering with the e******ns to essentially o*******w the United States.”

https://youtu.be/g1VeElBAeas

"Google CEO Sundar Pichai told the House Judiciary Committee in December, 2018, that the search engine was not biased against conservatives. Pichai explained what algorithm’s are said Google’s algorithm was not offensive to conservatives because its artificial intelligence does not operate in that manner. He told lawmakers, “things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it” are what drives the search results. Pichai said even if his programmers were anti-Republican, the process is so intricate that the artificial intelligence could not be manipulated and it was to complicated to train the algorithm to fit their bias." https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-13/distortion-grotesque-google-insider-turns-over-950-pages-documenting-bias-doj

10:08
blatantly lied to the American public
10:10
and lie to Congress when there is when
10:14
there is a pile of evidence showing that
10:16
what they're saying is untrue here is
10:18
another one of the documents that you
10:20
leaked to us this is well tell us what
10:23
this is okay so this is a blacklist one
10:25
of many black lists that that are at
10:28
Google this particular black list is
10:30
showing which
10:32
new sights aren't going to show up
10:35
underneath the search bar when people
10:37
are searching on their Android phones
10:38
and what they're doing is that they're
10:40
saying okay well you know news busters
10:43
the Gateway pundits National Enquirer
10:45
Media Matters Infowars Infowars they're
10:48
not going to appear you know on their
10:50
search results and they're telling
10:54
people that oh they don't they don't
10:56
have any blacklist this is all done you
10:58
know they don't have any political
11:00
ideology they don't have any political
11:02
bias but it's really clear that they do
11:05
and you know if Google wants to have
11:08
political bias and they want to say that
11:09
they've got political bias you know that
11:11
is their right as a company but for them
11:15
to go under oath and say that these
11:16
black lists don't exist"

Rose42

Yes they are biased and that bias is also in Youtube which they also own. Youtube’s bias is more obvious.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Most definitely, there is extreme bias. But, it flourishes in all ideological groups. For example...

https://www.projectveritas.exposed/

Rose42

And your example is run by a progressive with her own agenda and bias.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Exactly my point.

Rose42

Just making sure.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Slatten,
I don't see how you can compare the two. Google is intentionally manipulating it's algorithms and intentionally down ranking search results from sites that have a conservative/libertarian view. They are censoring and shaping information which is a distortion of reality.

Project Veritas does not do that. They expose the behind the scenes planning and thinking (using their subjects own words on film) of those who would seek to manipulate, deceive and shape the general public to their point of view. Project Veritas exposes deception, and does not create deception. That is the profound difference between the two.

While both have a viewpoint, the process by which they operate is the difference between night and day.