factnotfiction

And before the usual trumpkins have their heads explode and make up more of their ridiculous lies about the so called mainstream media, be advised children, this is a fox poll, showing support for gun control and that trump is losing support among those who respond to fox pollsters.

The kind of good news that make trumpkins read 'em and weep



https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-most-back-gun-restrictions-after-shootings-trump-ratings-down

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Holy s**t, Fox took a poll, say it ain't so.

factnotfiction

And told the t***h, glory be

Kevyn

Why do you use the term trumpkins? The preferred term for his cult members is trumptards.

factnotfiction

Good to know

plainlogic

Really curious now, why are liberals so joyous over losing their constitutional rights? or is it, just the rights they want to keep. Interesting indeed.

woodguru

Better is to know that you negate anything you have to say that is worth saying by injecting terms of disrespect, there is no point in trying to make a valid point if you come from that place...

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Fox took a poll, numbnuts, it wasn't an OpEd.
With some variations, it is the same freaking poll we see every time the old gun control crap comes up.

Polls are notorious for getting it wrong. Sampling, Methodologies, Leading questions, Loaded words, Question Number and Order--a poll can be tailored to get predetermined results.

Besides, pollsters don't have many options on who they can poll. They have to ask in person, make cold calls on landlines from a telephone book, or auto-dial from a phone number list which involves a prerecorded questionnaire. And, as Pew Research has noted: over 50% of US households have a cellphone but no landline and that number is on the rise. This poses a problem for polling companies because the 1991 Telephone Consumer Protection Act means that they can’t just autodial those cellphones. Not being able to autodial means that it is incredibly expensive and time-consuming for companies to poll those people. Even more problematic, this varies across America – younger households and poorer ones are much less likely to have a landline. So pollsters need to take that into account when they are trying to take the pulse of the nation.

Not to mention the number of people who just hang up on them. Many people don't want to be contacted.

factnotfiction

So genius, are you saying that fox polls are f**e? And what about rasmussen, who always seems to find a way to make trump look better than any other pollsters.

And if fox, rasmussen and all of the other polls are f**es and flawed, why do trump and all other politicians spend so much time and energy responding to them thru their mouthpieces?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

I didn't say the polls were f**ed, I said they are notorious for getting it wrong.

HILLARY IN A LANDSLIDE!

factnotfiction

The polls were right in that Hillary did in fact win the popular, and lost the e*******l college by less than 90k.

dongreen76

The answer to that is very simple; their not losing their Constituional rights.
They never had the right to possess automatic weaponry of any sort,not tanks,and machine guns,or any kind of nuclear Arsenal's.Do you know why I know this is true? because that type of weaponry didn't exist.What the framers were specifically talking about,was they had a right to protect themselves from a foreign threat and in order to do this so far as being armed they were talking about a m*****a.The m*****a came from the ranks of the citizensry.and since they had not formed an adequate army,when they were going to war just as people are expected to bring your own booze,so was it that they expected to bring their own one shot gun powder muskets,and those guns certainly were not gatlin related.The Dems never once claimed to want to void out second amendment rights, merely regulate it.I think the word regulate` IS` in the Constitution .I think it goes some like this. "A WELL REGULATED(meaning controlled) M*****A".It never really stated the right of the individual to possess arms.

zombinis3 Loc: Southwest

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their creator, and which governments are created to protect.

Every person who insists that they have a right to have weapons have a tendency to forget the life part of the three examples of God given rights. Yes weapons are needed to protect all three unalienable rights. Common sense also has to be used in defending those same rights. At least 82 percent of the shootings have been with legally attained weapons. Not like the ones from some dark corner deal but from owners who were not responsible in the ownership of that same weapon. Look back into the seventies and eighties how shooting that were considered accidents were because the owner of the weapon was not responsible enough. Example a 4 year old will explore their surrounding. Find the weapon placed in unlocked drawer ,couple that with the movies that were being shown at the time. The weapon becomes a toy, but loaded like most want it to be available when needed for protection. Whose fault was the shooting? Some may say that it was the child's fault because it didn't do what they were told. How many times did you as a youngster disobey your parents? Even now when shootings have become almost common place there are still the young associated shootings with the child pulling the trigger. Every Right and Privilege has a Responsibility associated to it.

dongreen76

[quote=plainlogic]Really curious now, why are liberals so joyous over losing their constitutional rights? or is it, just the rights they want to keep. Interesting indeed