One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Does this make sense? Libs go ahead and chime in.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Aug 12, 2019 13:33:18   #
tactful (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
Any ideas why the liberals never answered my question?


Yo,where does a Contemporary Constitutionalist fit in the mix? one who believes in truth,justice and the American way. having been on both sides of the fence. reptiles/ rethuginics do nothing for anyone,it wasn't always this way. much different pre trump.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 14:29:11   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
tactful wrote:
Yo,where does a Contemporary Constitutionalist fit in the mix? one who believes in truth,justice and the American way. having been on both sides of the fence. reptiles/ rethuginics do nothing for anyone,it wasn't always this way. much different pre trump.


Get help.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 14:51:45   #
GmanTerry (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
Was listening to one of the alphabet talk shows today and some Democrat said a number of times. No one including the President, Trump is above the Law. He said it enough where I wanted to yell at the T. V. O.K. I've got at.
When I went outside to contemplate mowing the lawn two thoughts struck me. First I decided I couldn't take the exercise (mowing the lawn) from my wife. Wouldn't be fair, and secondly I thought damn, Democrats keep saying no one is above the law, right? How come they support illegals being above the law? Isn't this kinda disingenuous?
Was listening to one of the alphabet talk shows to... (show quote)


The discourse from that group, Democrats, has never been known for its' ability to link two ideas. The ideas that,"No one is above the law" and "Illegals are a protected class and allowed to break the law" just does not compute for them. Their ideas are the only rational interpretation. What they really mean is that "No AMERICAN CITIZEN is above the law" but illegals are not citizens so they get a pass. That's leftest logic.

Semper Fi

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 15:10:58   #
Peewee (a regular here)
 
GmanTerry wrote:
The discourse from that group, Democrats, has never been known for its' ability to link two ideas. The ideas that,"No one is above the law" and "Illegals are a protected class and allowed to break the law" just does not compute for them. Their ideas are the only rational interpretation. What they really mean is that "No AMERICAN CITIZEN is above the law" but illegals are not citizens so they get a pass. That's leftest logic.

Semper Fi


Yep, the police officer who shot Michael Brown was found not guilty, but Pocahontas just called him a murderer. Two opposing thoughts and she chooses the wrong facts. He had just robbed a store and threatened the store owner and walked out with his free cigars, then charges the police officer when stopped. It took six shots to drop the 300 lb young thief. Who obviously planned to stomp the officer and maybe take his weapon and shoot him with it.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 16:28:56   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good point. I just think it gets sticky when we start separating families and then blame other presidents for establishing the policy--as if we were helpless to form our own policy.

As for Trump, I think he has proven he is above the law. He has an AG who will protect him even if he is in the wrong and if that fails he has a supreme court that will protect him and if that fails there is no shortage of those on the far-right who would love for the opportunity to protect him by overthrowing the democrat party. That much protection from that many people makes one above the law. Fortunately, I don't think he is above our electoral laws so no matter what happens in 2020 he will be gone by 2024...
Good point. I just think it gets sticky when we st... (show quote)


Probably, making room for Don Jr.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 16:52:47   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
debeda wrote:
HYPOCRITES


Unmitigated ones!

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 17:14:01   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
Seth wrote:
Unmitigated ones!



| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 17:46:34   #
JoyV (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good point. I just think it gets sticky when we start separating families and then blame other presidents for establishing the policy--as if we were helpless to form our own policy.

As for Trump, I think he has proven he is above the law. He has an AG who will protect him even if he is in the wrong and if that fails he has a supreme court that will protect him and if that fails there is no shortage of those on the far-right who would love for the opportunity to protect him by overthrowing the democrat party. That much protection from that many people makes one above the law. Fortunately, I don't think he is above our electoral laws so no matter what happens in 2020 he will be gone by 2024...
Good point. I just think it gets sticky when we st... (show quote)


Children are separated fro the adults they crossed the border with under specific conditions.
#1--There is evidence the adult is not the parent or relative of the child.
#2--There is evidence the adult is molesting or otherwise abusing the child.
#3--The child needs hospitalization or has a communicable illness.
#4--The adult needs hospitalization or has a communicable illness.
#5--The adult has an outstanding felony warrant and is being incarcerated.
Otherwise families stay together.

Now which of those conditions do you believe they are wrong to separate the child?

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 17:52:16   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
JoyV wrote:
Children are separated fro the adults they crossed the border with under specific conditions.
#1--There is evidence the adult is not the parent or relative of the child.
#2--There is evidence the adult is molesting or otherwise abusing the child.
#3--The child needs hospitalization or has a communicable illness.
#4--The adult needs hospitalization or has a communicable illness.
#5--The adult has an outstanding felony warrant and is being incarcerated.
Otherwise families stay together.

Now which of those conditions do you believe they are wrong to separate the child?
Children are separated fro the adults they crossed... (show quote)


All if done under Trump. None if done under Obama.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 17:55:05   #
JoyV (a regular here)
 
tactful wrote:
Yo,where does a Contemporary Constitutionalist fit in the mix? one who believes in truth,justice and the American way. having been on both sides of the fence. reptiles/ rethuginics do nothing for anyone,it wasn't always this way. much different pre trump.


There is no such thing as a contemporary Constitutionalist. There are Constitutionalists period. The United States Constitution has no contemporary, new and improved, updates!!!!

And if you ask where does a Constitutionalist fit? A Constitutionalist ALWAYS stands with the United States Constitution!!!!!

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 17:55:57   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
JoyV wrote:
There is no such thing as a contemporary Constitutionalist. There are Constitutionalists period. The United States Constitution has no contemporary, new and improved, updates!!!!

And if you ask where does a Constitutionalist fit? A Constitutionalist ALWAYS stands with the United States Constitution!!!!!


WELL SAID, JoyV

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 18:21:17   #
tactful (a regular here)
 
JoyV wrote:
There is no such thing as a contemporary Constitutionalist. There are Constitutionalists period. The United States Constitution has no contemporary, new and improved, updates!!!!

And if you ask where does a Constitutionalist fit? A Constitutionalist ALWAYS stands with the United States Constitution!!!!!


alrighy then; get yer knickers in a knot🤗.Constiitutionalist it is. others and I tagged contemporary in lieu of party[ we're diverse] we like to ascribe to the we are all in this together let's make the best of it.and go by our constitution ( while we can).
it's a small select group but we're out here.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 18:30:09   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
JoyV wrote:
There is no such thing as a contemporary Constitutionalist. There are Constitutionalists period. The United States Constitution has no contemporary, new and improved, updates!!!!

And if you ask where does a Constitutionalist fit? A Constitutionalist ALWAYS stands with the United States Constitution!!!!!



| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 19:45:55   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
tactful wrote:
alrighy then; get yer knickers in a knot🤗.Constiitutionalist it is. others and I tagged contemporary in lieu of party[ we're diverse] we like to ascribe to the we are all in this together let's make the best of it.and go by our constitution ( while we can).
it's a small select group but we're out here.


You’re definitely out there.

| Reply
Aug 12, 2019 21:03:37   #
tactful (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
You’re definitely out there.


This from a forum like minded: and I'm out there? conservative friends should be back soon fromN.C. where a republican graphic designer artist did the presidential seal with golf clubs when he spoke with scouts,we'll find out if another has joined in who started #onetermdonnie movement.



| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.