thebigp

“A****a is a far-left militant [2] political movement of autonomous, self-described anti-f*****t groups in the United States.[3][4][5] The term is loosely used to refer to anti-r****t, anti-sexist, anti-homophobia, as well as anarchist and anti-capitalist groups.[6] Unlike the traditional left, the over-riding aim of self-described A****a groups is to oppose f*****m. These groups are usually anti-government and anti-capitalist, and their methodologies are often perceived as more closely aligned with anarchists than the mainstream left.[2]
A****a is supposed to be against what many people would agree with if only A****a would do it in a more honest way, like discuss it without the black hoods, sticks, bats, and wh**ever else they can use to silence what they claim to be fighting, “Free Speech.”
They even admit they do not align themselves with the “Left” because the “Left” does not hold their ideologies.
But allow me to continue from Wikipedia:
“According to National Public Radio, "People who speak for the A****a movement acknowledge they sometimes carry clubs and sticks," and their "approach is confrontational."[26] CNN describes A****a as "known for causing damage to property during protests."[3] Scott Crow, described by CNN as "a longtime A****a organizer," argues that destroying property is not a form of violence.[3]”
Clearly, A****a goes to events looking to harm and disrupt any peaceful rally, especially if it is a rally for Conservatives.
We cannot allow a group from any side to stop “Free Speech,” but A****a does just that; and it goes after certain speech it does not want their base to understand because once they do understand, they may decide to leave the C*******t ideology of A****a.
Again, from Discover the Networks:
“At its heart, the A****a movement is in fact a c*******t phenomenon whose adherents – consisting predominantly of upper-middle-class white males – believe that conservatives, particularly those who supported Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. p**********l e******n, are the moral equivalent of N**is and are therefore not entitled to the free-speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment. Moreover, as the New York A****a group indicated, the movement has a strong element of anarchism as well; thus its members are commonly seen waving the red and black f**g of anarcho-c*******m.”
Yes, read the last hyphenated word in the paragraph above, “anarcho-c*******m.” That term alone shows what the A****a group really is a bunch of C*******ts that are mad because their candidate, Hillary Clinton, lost and now it is up to them and anyone they can convince to do all they can to disrupt our government.
“The Left's Portrayal of A****a

Mainstream media outlets have typically refrained from acknowledging just how radical and revolutionary A****a's objectives and practices are, portraying the movement instead as a well-intentioned alliance of idealists who seek nothing more than to thwart the evils of right-wing “f*****m.”The Washington Post, for instance, has benignly referred to A****a and its allies as “a****ascist groups.” A Los Angeles Times piece calls it an “anti-f*****t movement.” And the New York Daily News has described A****a as an “anti-f*****t collective.”
Other sources – both mainstream and far left – have painted A****a in openly complimentary tones. For example, an April 2017Esquire magazine article lauded the movement's “anti-f*****t” vigilantes for crashing pro-Trump demonstrations where a “significant … presence” of “w***e s*********t, alt-right, anti-Semitic and neo-N**i groups … intersect with the president's broader support base.” A January 2017 piece in The Nation celebrated the fortitude of A****a activists, comparing them to those “who long before Trump have defended counter-violence against oppression—as in Ferguson, as in Baltimore, as in Watts, as in counter-r**ts against the Klu Klux Klan, as in s***e revolts.” And the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an organization that routinely likens conservatives to r****ts and f*****ts, reports that A****a activists bravely “confront neo-N**is and r****t skinheads in the street.” Further, SPLC has published a number of stories about A****a protesters sustaining injuries in their skirmishes with pro-Trump conservatives.”
A****a runs around the outside of the flames it starts like a moth who knows better than to go into the fire.
However, if “WE THE PEOPLE” keep allowing this to happen without demanding justice be brought up this disruptive group, we are accepting their ideas and the shutdown of Free Speech.
We do not wish to shut down Free Speech, but to demand only one side of a story, destroy property and commit acts of violence against peaceful people like A****a is doing is not right; and the Lame Stream Media will not go against what they do and say for fear of being shut down by A****a, much like what happened when the N**i’s took control of Germany.
It is time to either take a stand or watch our nation be torn apart by ideas that do not represent the law.
Destruction of the United States? “Summer of Chaos”
Leon Puissegur — July 9, 2016
We are saddened by the deaths of police officers in Dallas, Texas, after they were ambushed by a black man who wanted to k**l white people - in particular, white police officers. The Democratic Party could have helped fuel the attacks upon police officers.
In the summer of 2015, the Democratic National Committee officially endorsed the increasingly violent Black L***s M****r (B*M) movement, whose members accuse police nationwide of systemic anti-black r****m and brutality against black suspects. Specifically, the Democrats embraced a statementcondemning the U.S. for its allegedly systemic police violence against African-Americans. A draft of the B*M statement included the following language:
WHEREAS, we, the Democratic National Committee, have repeatedly called for race and justice – demilitarization of police, ending racial profiling, criminal justice reform, and investments in young people, families, and communities — after Trayvon Martin, after Michael Brown, after Tamir Rice, after Freddie Gray, after Sandra Bland, after Christian Taylor, after too many others lost in the unacceptable epidemic of extrajudicial k*****gs of unarmed black men, women, and children at the hands of police ...
WHEREAS, without systemic reform this state of unrest jeopardizes the well-being of our democracy and our nation;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the DNC joins with Americans across the country in affirming “Black l***s m****r” and the “say her name” efforts to make visible the pain of our fellow and sister Americans as they condemn extrajudicial k*****gs of unarmed African American men, women and children ...
(The "Say Her Name" campaign is an offshoot of Black L***s M****r that claims not enough attention is paid to black female victims of police brutality.)
In the document, the DNC also "renews our previous calls to action and urges Congress to adopt systemic reforms at state, local, and federal levels to prohibit law enforcement from profiling based on race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion, to minimize the t***sfer of excess equipment (like the military-grade vehicles and weapons that were used to police peaceful civilians in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri) to federal and state law enforcement; and to support prevention programs that give young people alternatives to incarceration."
The DNC delegates approved the foregoing resolution on the same day a white sheriff's deputy in Texas was shot to death by a black suspect in an unprovoked attack. The next day, Black L***s M****r demonstrators marched near the Minnesota state fair chanting violent anti-police slogans and carrying signs reading "End W***e S*******y." Activists shouted “Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon” -- a reference to dead police officers in body bags -- while walking (protected by police) on a highway south of the fairgrounds.
The section titled "Democrats and the War on Terror" is adapted from "Party of Defeat," authored by David Horowitz and Ben Johnson and published by FrontPageMag.com on April 11, 2008.
The Black L***s M****r group was formed by people who have a hatred for freedom and a love for the Black Panthers ideology. That was shown in a previous article.
“WHEREAS, the Democratic Party believes in the American Dream and the promise of liberty and justice for all, and we know that this dream is a nightmare for too many young people stripped of their dignity under thevestiges of s***ery, Jim Crow and W***e S*******y; and…”
Looking at this declaration, one is led to assume that another group of people developed the “…vestiges of s***ery, Jim Crow and W***e S*******y…” But take a look back at another article, which clearly shows the Democratic Party was deeply involved in another group. Yes, the Democratic Party itself was part of the problem that it states in the words above.
The Democratic Party makes a statement as if it were never involved in what happened to the black people when, in the real world, the Democratic Party was and always has been instrumental in keeping the black people poor so they can be led like sheep to the v****g booths. That is the sad part of the Democratic Party: they continue to abuse the ill-informed minorities and make them believe the Democratic Party will do all they can to help them when the t***h is they just want the v**e. The Democratic Party, along with President Obama, supported Black Lives Matte,r and just recently, although it may not be totally proven, it looks as if the party is aligned with forcing r**ts to obtain Martial Law so Obama can continue as President, taking away all the freedoms we now have. Black L***s M****r has meshed with the Obama administration for what seems to be the takeover of the United States. This is not 100% confirmed as of this writing, but some of it has shown up in other formats, showing this may well be planned.
Hacked messages of #BlackLivesMatter leader reveal Obama admin’s plan for ‘summer of chaos’ and martial law