One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Some emails
Jul 30, 2019 16:53:01   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Further, Mueller clarified President Trump was not indicted due to a lack of evidence, not because Office of Legal Counsel guidance preventing the indictment of a sitting president.


VICE News
?
@vicenews
"We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime." - Mueller clarifies previous OLC memo statement https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1LyGBAdPrloKN

Thought you'd like the real reason, not some moronic controversy-lie that msm put out. In case you don't know, Nadler has h**ed Trump for almost thirty years and it'svery telling.
---------------------------------------------------

Ever since the release of Attorney General William Barr’s synopsis of the Mueller report, Rep. Devin Nunes — the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee — has been talking about criminal referrals for acts committed during the 2016 p**********l campaign and its aftermath.

Now, the California congressman is making it clear just how many people he’s going after — and former FBI Director James Comey is just one of those who has a reason to sweat.

In an appearance on Fox News on Sunday, Nunes said he’d sent eight criminal referrals to Barr, the latest sign that high-level Republicans were going on the offensive in the wake of the Mueller report.

Nunes told Fox News he’d been working on the referrals for over two years. However, he had delayed sending them over until Barr’s confirmation. (The Mueller report, one imagines, didn’t hurt his case either.)

“We’re prepared this week to notify the attorney general that we’re prepared to send those referrals over,” Nunes told host Maria Bartiromo. “First of all, all of these are classified or sensitive. … Five of them are what I would call straight up referrals — so, just referrals that name someone and name the specific crimes.

TRENDING: Democrat-Controlled State House Passes Controversial Measure for I*****l I*******ts

“Those crimes are lying to Congress, misleading Congress, leaking classified information. So five of them are those types.”

https://youtu.be/QVxdW--0DnA

“There are three (referrals) that I think are more complicated,” he added.
They involve material investigators presented to the special court established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Do you think that criminal referrals were needed in the wake of the Mueller report?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“So, on the first one, is FISA abuse and other matters. We believe there was a conspiracy to lie to the FISA court, mislead the FISA court by numerous individuals that all need to be investigated and looked at that, and we believe the (relevant) statute is the conspiracy statute,” he said.

That likely referred to the use of the “Trump dossier” — assembled as opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee — to obtain a warrant in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court against a Trump campaign official.

Nunes later said that “we’ve had a lot of concerns with the way intelligence was used” in the probe into the Trump campaign and possible collusion with the Russians.

“The second conspiracy one is involving manipulation of intelligence that also could ensnarl many Americans,” he continued.

“The third is what I would call a global leak referral,” Nunes said. “So, there are about a dozen highly sensitive classified information leaks that were given to only a few reporters over the last two-and-a-half-plus years. So, you know, we don’t know if there’s actually been any leak investigations that have been opened, but we do believe that we’ve got pretty good information and a pretty good idea of who could be behind these leaks.”

RELATED: Looks Like AOC Just Broke a Law the Dems Accused Trump of Breaking, but Don’t Seem Bothered if She Does It

The “horrific” leaks Nunes referred to involved Trump’s conversations with major world leaders as well as the transcripts of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s phone calls.

“I think it’s impossible to ignore,” Nunes said. “If the Mueller team was busting people for lying to the FBI — there are some pretty simple times when people lied to Congress for the sole purpose of obstructing our investigation.”

The criminal referrals also might involve more than one person. In fact, Nunes said that a conspiracy referral could ensnare “a dozen, two dozen people.”

There are a few individuals we can possibly guess will be among those referred. Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen is being investigated for lying to Congress by both sides after inconsistencies in his testimony last month arose.

And then there’s House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, who was suspected by Donald Trump Jr. when it came to leaking his closed-door testimony before the committee.

Fox News reported that in January, Trump Jr. said “there’s a 99.9 percent chance (House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is) the guy” who leaked the 2017 testimony, adding that he “came out of testimony 8 at night and CNN is running quotes from noon on about my testimony, you know, in the House Intelligence Committee.”

“I mean, that has to say something about what is going on and who they are. Since (Schiff has) never met a camera he didn’t love, I would bet a lot of money that it was him.”

The FISA warrant, however, might be of more concern to Democrats, particularly when it comes to Comey. Even if the criminal referrals don’t include him, they’re bound to include those close to him — and that’s something that’s probably going to make him sweat.

Others who have reason to sweat? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. They all signed FISA warrant applications.

The Republicans have increasingly gone on the offensive since the release of the Mueller report. Nunes’ criminal referrals aren’t even the most aggressive move — that award, thus far, has to go to Sen. Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who’s proposed a special counsel to look into all matter of Obama-era shenanigans in regard to the 2016 e******n — but it’s in the same vein.

The message is clear:

Now it’s the Republicans’ turn. And unlike the chimerical Russiagate accusations — what President Donald Trump repeatedly called a “witch hunt” — this is actually real. The idea that a dossier consisting of dodgy opposition research paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democrats was used to get a FISA warrant against a Trump campaign employee — that’s real.

Lives being destroyed to promote a narrative? That’s real, too.

Peter Strzok’s text messages and conflicts of interest in several investigations? Again, real.

This is about justice. Now that the phony “collusion” narrative is out of the way, we can finally seek it.
-------------------------

Patriot Pulse


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just suffered this humiliating defeat


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just made a giant mistake.

The freshmen Congresswoman finally got her wish and picked the fight she was dreaming of with Donald Trump.

But it ended badly for her and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just suffered this humiliating defeat.


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been agitating for impeachment for months.

She finally got her wish.

Texas Congressman Al Green forced a v**e on an impeachment resolution claiming Donald Trump’s supposedly “r****t” tweets made him unfit for office.

The resolution was defeated in a massive 332 to 95 v**e with 137 Democrats joining Republicans to table the motion.


The Washington Post reports:

House Democrats joined with Republicans on Wednesday to k**l an impeachment resolution against President Trump, a move that is likely to rankle the Democratic Party’s liberal base clamoring to oust the president.

The v**e was 332 to 95, with 95 Democrats v****g to keep the resolution alive and 137 of their colleagues siding with Republicans. It was a surprising turn, just one day after the two parties bickered bitterly over House passage of a resolution condemning Trump’s r****t remarks.

Rep. Al Green (D-Tex.) put Democratic leaders in a bind Tuesday night by filing articles of impeachment accusing Trump of committing high crimes and misdemeanors. His resolution, which cited Trump’s comments targeting four minority Democratic congresswomen, was privileged, requiring that the House act within two days.

“It’s time for us to deal with his bigotry. This president has demonstrated that he’s willing to yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater, and we have seen what can happen to people when bigotry is allowed to have a free rein,” Green told reporters Wednesday. “We all ought to go on record. We all ought to let the world know where we stand when we have a bigot in the White House.”

Democrats will surely try again this fall after Robert Mueller’s upcoming testimony.

But that testimony will contain no new bombshells.

And Democrats – including Nancy Pelosi and her leadership team – will be desperate to avoid a politically toxic impeachment v**e.
---------------------------------------------
I seem to remember sending this before, but what's one more time? If you want to, you can write your own letter too, I have.


Letter to Pelosi ...
Wow! This man is really torqued!!! Could we wonder what Pelosi did to him to make him so mad?
FYI, This has been checked via Snopes, who contacted Mr. Guthrie, who confirmed he did write & send this letter to Ms. Pelosi,,,, here is one brave American, AND his credentials are impressive! Check his credentials, then read his letter to Pelosi!
___________________________________________________

Born: St. Louis, Missouri. August 21, 1944
Bar Admissions: North Carolina, 1969
U.S. District Court, Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of North Carolina, 1969
U.S. Tax Court
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Education: Woodford College, 1966 A.B.
Mercer University, 1969 J.D.
Phi Alpha Delta
Vice-Justice, District XIV, 1968 - 1969
Professional Associations and Memberships:
North Carolina and American Bar Associations ( Member, Sections on: Administrative Law; General Practice; Litigation)
26th Judicial District and North Carolina State Bar
Mecklenburg County Bar Association
American Association of Justice
North Carolina Trial Lawyers Association
Captain, U.S. Army, 1969-1971, Vietnam
National Defense Medal, 1969
Republic of Viet Nam Service Media.
Bronze Star Medals (2), 1971
Assistant District Attorney, Mecklenburg County, 1971 - 1974
Charlotte Chamber of Commerce
Chairman, Board of Trustees - Providence United Methodist Church
Board of Directors, Alexander Children's Home
Wofford Alumni Executive Council
Scoutmaster, Boy Scouts of America
Board of Directors, Boy Scouts of America of Mecklenburg County
Board of Directors, Girl Scout Council
Life Member, National Eagle Scout Association
Life Member, Girl Scouts of America

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Ms. Pelosi:

I write to you out of utter disdain! You are as despicable and un-American as the t*****r Jane Fonda.

I am a soon to be a 65 year-old who has v**ed in every state and local e******n since 1966. I have v**ed for both Republicans and Democrats alike. I have worked on campaigns for both Republicans and Democrats, white and black. I served the country that I love in Vietnam, as my son did in the Middle East . I was awarded two bronze stars. I have been involved in politics since age 6 when my father was campaign manager for a truly great American Congressman, Charles Raper Jonas, who worked for his constituents and his country, and was to be admired, unlike you.

You obviously haven't read the Constitution recently, if ever, the Federalist Papers, or even David McCulloughs book on John Adams. You ought to take the time while riding around in your government provided luxury executive jet to do just that. You represent Socialistic and even Marxist principals that our founding fathers tried to avoid when setting out the capitalistic republican form of government represented by our Constitution.

I find it interesting that you and your husband are multi-millionaires with much of your fortune being made as a result of your public service. You have controlled legislation that has enhanced your husband's investments both on and off shore. At the same time you redistributed the wealth of others. Our system of a free market economy is being destroyed by the likes of you. You ride around in a Gulfstream airplane at the tax payers expense while criticizing the presidents of companies who produced something for the economy. You add nothing to the economy of the United States; you only subtract therefrom.

I would like to suggest that you return to the city of fruitcakes and nuts and eat your husband's canned tuna and pineapple - produced by i*****l i*******ts and by workers who have been excluded from the protection that 90% of the legal workers in the United States have.

I await your defeat in the next e******n with glee...

Don’t ever use the term un-American again for protesters who love this country and are exercising their rights upon which this country was founded. By the way, while I served in the Army, I was spit on by the same type of lunatics who support you and who you probably supported in the 60s and 70s. You are an embarrassment to all of us who served so that you would have the protected right of free speech to call us un-American. But at the same time, I have the right to write you to notify you that I consider you to be un-American, as do the majority of the people of this formerly great country. You are a true disgrace to most of the people who served this country by offering themselves for public service in the United States Congress.

I feel certain your aides will not share this letter with you, but I intend to share it with many...

Let's help this man fulfill his 'commitment' to Pelosi
by forwarding his thoughts!
---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply
Jul 30, 2019 17:47:38   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Sooo, when Mueller was asked " if it weren't for the opinion of the OLC, you would have indicted the President?", to which he answered "yes"................he was just parroting the MSM?

You know, the unique thing about videos, with sound, is that you can watch and hear questions asked and hear the answers.

Reply
Jul 30, 2019 19:16:29   #
Gatsby
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Sooo, when Mueller was asked " if it weren't for the opinion of the OLC, you would have indicted the President?", to which he answered "yes"................he was just parroting the MSM?

You know, the unique thing about videos, with sound, is that you can watch and hear questions asked and hear the answers.


Why don't you impeach him? Oh that's right you already tried, and failed, twice.

You have already split your party in half, please go ahead, keep driving that wedge deeper.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.