factnotfiction

Since trump claims that the Mueller report has cleared him of "collusion" and he rants, raves and tweets about it almost daily, how can he be so stupid to claim that that the "real collusion" came from Hillary and her campaign.

But if 'collusion' is not a crime, is trump too stupid to think that his alleged collusion is not criminal, but Hillary's alleged collusion is?

Or is this just another example of trumps dementia, paranoia, and persecution complex?

Auntie Dee

The Mueller investigation DID NOT find any "criminal conspiracy", they did not use the word "collusion" as that is not a crime, as you have properly stated.

There have been a lot of allegations & some proven facts brought forth about Hillary's actions, it may lead to a finding of "criminal conspiracy" in a similar investigation, or not!

Trump is only expressing his opinion of Hillary's actions! Same thing as Democrats expressing their opinions for the last 2-1/2 years! What seems more paranoid is that Dems are STILL expressing that opinion, even after their own investigation has determined it NOT TO BE SO!

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Trump's Alleged Collusion Never Happened
Hill's Campaign Paying For Documents From A Foreign Agent
To Alter The Out-Come Of A P**********l E******n
Isn't Collusion, It's A Felony
(Just Like Destroying Subpoenaed Evidence, And Their Devices)

That's Why They Laundered The Funds Through Attorneys
The Idea Is Client Confidentiality
You Line Up Enough People
Someone's Bound To Snap
We'll See....

Liberty Tree

So, to use your thinking, if Hillary's actual collusion is not a crime to you then Trump's non collusion cannot be a crime except in your dementia TDS mind.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

He used language the left is familiar with not legalese.

Larai Loc: Fallon, NV

Having watched Both the Judiciary and Intelligence committee's hearings, there was a binder of 25 contacts and statements that didn't make it into the report, which republicans grilled him on... He had no answer other than it wasn't in his pervue!! Apparently, there was enough evidence left out of the report that could have perhaps put a whole other light on the whole s**ttery... Both hearings.. almost verbatim from one hearing to the next.. Nadler chaired the Judiciary, and Schiff the Intelligence committee and Schiff looked Rabid!! Positively drooling at the prospect that Mueller would clear it all up.. but since Mueller didn't actually author the report, he had No clue on what had been left out.. he stuck to the report but didnt' know what was in it, because he had to ask...Alot where they were citing from in the report, Maybe they should have used Adam Weisman as he was the true author of that report.. Maybe.. over the advice of Barr.. Mueller should Not have testified.. I reckon.. just my opinion on this part.. Mueller knew that Weisman would have messed up under pressure of the questioning.. *eye roll*

Libs probably didnt' watch either hearing, they probably watched snippets from their fave lib media outlet with spin in between.. they should really try watching it front to back.. so they could see for themselves the rats exiting the ship... then the dems threw him under the bus. bc they didn't get what they wanted.. shocker!.

One republican said that anything after the first volume after he said he wasn't going to prosecute trump.. that collusion isn't illegal, he did not have the Power to "exonerate" nor did Barr.. it's not even a legal term.. everything in volume 2 doesn't count..and since volume two was mostly made up of sound bites and examples from MSM and fox.. the volume two is irrelevant!

ImLogicallyRight

Just a few thoughts.

Collusion:
If a group of people, loosely or tightly get together to pay for false information, and apply for warrants based on known false information, conduct spying based on the false information, try to falsely accuse another of crimes and continues this false narrative involving many others for two and a half years and counting; isn't there a crime somewhere in there for at least several of those operatives.
Example: what the Democrat party has done for the last three years.

On the other hand, if someone makes light casual attempts to interfere in an investigation into a crime that doesn't exist, is that in an of itself a crime.
Example: if the police want to search your car for t***sporting marijuana and you stop that investigation by destroying the car, can you be convicted of a crime of obstruction for t***sporting oregano.

Just a few thoughts.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

"WOW!!" I hope that you are a troll and not this obtuse.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

No, this is the patented Trump response to everything not pro-Trump...................deny, accuse someone else, deny.......then claim it wasn't illegal. We saw a clear example of that with the porn star deal; I don't know her ( here's a picture of you smiling with your arm around her ), ok, I had sex with her, but I didn't pay her hush money ( here's a canceled check ), ok, hush money was paid, but someone else done it ( Here's audio proof of you authorizing the payment ) ok, I paid hush money.....................but it wasn't illegal.

Noraa Loc: Kansas

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

Welll, ... if he did hire a hooker, ... which I don't believe, ... at least he didn't take her for a late night car ride through a swamp, and drown her, to make sure she didn't talk.

On the other hand, even if he hired a hundred hookers, and paid every one of then to keep quiet, .... he was still the best candidate for POTUS in 2016!!!!!!!

Larai Loc: Fallon, NV

rebob14

The thing that the “investigation” uncovered is senility and corruption

Kazudy

Wow!! You are 2 beers short of the six pact, were you born that way, or were you dropped as a baby and landed on your head. Yes collusion is not a crime, yes there was collusion,BUT the collusion was between Hillary, John T*****r McCain, Comey, and Barrack Obama. You should change your handle from factnofiction to clueless that better describes you.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

It's been said that fictionnotfact was victim to head binding.

Like the Chinese did to some of their women's feet for years.

It was supposed to reduce mongoloid in his heritage.

Just saying, it's been said.