One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
National Mistrust on the rise
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jul 24, 2019 16:06:50   #
JW
 
BigMike wrote:
One could say diversity is diametrically opposed to unity.


Exactly!

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 16:09:35   #
JW
 
GmanTerry wrote:
This is my soap box topic. When I worked for the Federal Government I was forced once a year to sit through a day of M**************m and Diversity. I used to argue with the r****t anti-white presenter that the melting pot is what made America the greatest country in the world. She always argued that we are no longer a melting pot but instead a salad, with a carrot here and a cucumber there. Who and when was this indoctrination created? It is the replacement syllabus in schools for civics now. This is reckless balkanization of a once united nation.

Semper Fi
This is my soap box topic. When I worked for the F... (show quote)


Absolutely correct!

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 17:15:37   #
bahmer
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Gas lighting the people and making them question their own better judgment has taken its' toll. I never heard of "F**e News" till trump came along and I doubt anybody else did either.


What if ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC were to actually report the t***h for awhile instead of reporting 98% negative about President Trump. Do you think that that might change the public's opinion about the news media. If they are going to go all negative all of the time then label as what they are and that is an arm of the democrat party. I wouldn't listen to someone who had nothing good to say about what I was doing and I suspect that the majority of people wouldn't either. If they want their message to be heard good bad or indifferent then start reporting the t***h and not the t***h that you perceive but the t***h that used to be published by old time journalists. Maybe you remember they went out and they dug up a story and they had their sources and they would lay the groundwork for their story and they would list those sources that allowed them to withhold the names of others. It was t***hful reporting that broke open Watergate it wasn't wishful thinking. Somebody did their legwork and broke the story to the public. We don't have news stories anymore all we have are editorials.

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2019 18:03:43   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
bahmer wrote:
What if ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC were to actually report the t***h for awhile instead of reporting 98% negative about President Trump. Do you think that that might change the public's opinion about the news media. If they are going to go all negative all of the time then label as what they are and that is an arm of the democrat party. I wouldn't listen to someone who had nothing good to say about what I was doing and I suspect that the majority of people wouldn't either. If they want their message to be heard good bad or indifferent then start reporting the t***h and not the t***h that you perceive but the t***h that used to be published by old time journalists. Maybe you remember they went out and they dug up a story and they had their sources and they would lay the groundwork for their story and they would list those sources that allowed them to withhold the names of others. It was t***hful reporting that broke open Watergate it wasn't wishful thinking. Somebody did their legwork and broke the story to the public. We don't have news stories anymore all we have are editorials.
What if ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC were to actually... (show quote)


T***hful reporting in this day and age is the object of scorn among the radicalized and indoctrinated. Opinion pieces are just that and discernable from facts. It seem that fact checkers are not free from being labeled as f**e--It all depends on who is disagreeing with the answer they are given.

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 19:22:18   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
JW wrote:
Exactly!


I appreciate your affirmation.



Reply
Jul 24, 2019 19:36:55   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
T***hful reporting in this day and age is the object of scorn among the radicalized and indoctrinated. Opinion pieces are just that and discernable from facts. It seem that fact checkers are not free from being labeled as f**e--It all depends on who is disagreeing with the answer they are given.


The t***h is TRUE and everything else is NOT TRUE!!!

My ultimate filter is God's Word, which has a LOT to say about EVERYTHING, including POLITICS, LEADERS and how to tell the devil's counterfeit to God's perfect will.

Everywhere in God's Word it says our attempts to govern righteously ALL fail!!! ALL. Just show me one (wh**ever the intentions of the principals were) where their altruism lasted more than a few generations.

Isn't that illustrated ad nauseum in Judges, I & II Kings, I & II Chronicals, etc?

God's perfect will is not even a consideration these days.

What defense does a humanist have against the influence spiritual influences if they deny the spiritual realm exists or that they might have something to do with the part of reality that is apparent to us?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.