One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats want to declare "C*****e C****e" a national emergency
Page <<first <prev 14 of 17 next> last>>
Jul 23, 2019 08:01:49   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Rose42 wrote:
Show me where I defended Trump. You are sounding like a zealot. Zealots think anyone who doesn't agree with them are automatically closed minded. That is indeed the pot calling the kettle black.

You sound more narrow minded than educated which isn't uncommon among those with graduate degrees.


Educated beyond their intelligence.

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:08:22   #
Cuda2020
 
Rose42 wrote:
Show me where I defended Trump. You are sounding like a zealot. Zealots think anyone who doesn't agree with them are automatically closed minded. That is indeed the pot calling the kettle black.

You sound more narrow minded than educated which isn't uncommon among those with graduate degrees.


You are such a righty it's not funny, you're only fooling yourself, I'm inclined to think another righty's dishonesty. If you want to see a zealot and narrow mindedness look in the mirror. It always seems to be the uneducated who slander people who hold dergrees, gee why do you think that is?

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:11:35   #
jhf3 Loc: VA
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
Plant trees; LOTS of trees.

Yes, trees, bushes, and plants with maximum green leaf surface area. It may be too late, especially With all the damage Trump's done, but at least it will help. Also, will Democrats ever admit there's a comprehensive immigration problem and be able to change it? Per a 2015 Pew research study, immigration is now the main (by far) cause of population growth in the U.S. So, nix the 1965 law that allows virtually unlimited immigration (where immigrants, once here, can invite all their relatives), and establish a merit-based system. But certainly allow all the near-destitute Mexican farmers here whose ability to farm was ruined because of c*****e c****e.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2019 08:15:16   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Don't let words scare you, would you like us to fluff things up for you?


You mean your dream of a borderless one government world with Islam as the policing force?

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:29:34   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
You are such a righty it's not funny, you're only fooling yourself, I'm inclined to think another righty's dishonesty. If you want to see a zealot and narrow mindedness look in the mirror. It always seems to be the uneducated who slander people who hold dergrees, gee why do you think that is?


There are a lot of useless brain washed people with useless degrees out there.
A case in point;
So God made a liberal.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:30:05   #
Cuda2020
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
You mean your dream of a borderless one government world with Islam as the policing force?


We are one world, deal with it. It behooves us to then work together, collaterally, to resolve world issues such as climate. This sounds reasonable to me, but I'm not full of fear and am territorial. If you want to stop refugees from flooding in then we need to help change their scenario where they live, where they came from.

Some i*********n l*ws need to be changed I agree, but that is a different issue then what is presently happening at our border. No one, I repeat no one should be making a profit from any of it.

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:33:07   #
Cuda2020
 
eagleye13 wrote:
There are a lot of useless brain washed people with useless degrees out there.
A case in point;
So God made a liberal.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4


Then there's the NEO right, simply useless altogether, just sucking up the air.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2019 08:33:48   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
We are one world, deal with it. It behooves us to then work together, collaterally, to resolve world issues such as climate. This sounds reasonable to me, but I'm not full of fear and am territorial. If you want to stop refugees from flooding in then we need to help change their scenario where they live, where they came from.

Some i*********n l*ws need to be changed I agree, but that is a different issue then what is presently happening at our border. No one, I repeat no one should be making a profit from any of it.
We are one world, deal with it. It behooves us to ... (show quote)


I invested in t*********red Porto potties in San Francisco. I'm making a fortune. But the straights and merely gays use the streets as usual in San Francisco.

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 08:42:31   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
jhf3 wrote:
Yes, trees, bushes, and plants with maximum green leaf surface area. It may be too late, especially With all the damage Trump's done, but at least it will help. Also, will Democrats ever admit there's a comprehensive immigration problem and be able to change it? Per a 2015 Pew research study, immigration is now the main (by far) cause of population growth in the U.S. So, nix the 1965 law that allows virtually unlimited immigration (where immigrants, once here, can invite all their relatives), and establish a merit-based system. But certainly allow all the near-destitute Mexican farmers here whose ability to farm was ruined because of c*****e c****e.
Yes, trees, bushes, and plants with maximum green ... (show quote)


Not long ago you declared you had made your last post. Another Liberal lie. Why am I not surprised?

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 09:16:24   #
jhf3 Loc: VA
 
jhf3 wrote:
It's not that complicated.
You can see from the "1700 to Present" graph that the total ppm of CO2 to added by man in 64 yrs. (since about 1955; that's a very short amount of time for such a dramatic rise!) is about 104 ppm:
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/wp-content/plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/co2_800k_zoom.png
Other historical CO2 graphs:
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/
Now we're up to 415+ ppm: https://phys.org/news/2019-05-million-co2-historic-high.html
For further clarification, read:
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/2018/09/19/is-the-current-rise-in-co2-definitely-caused-by-human-activities/
I should not have to add that the amount of data that went into those graphs is huge.
It's not that complicated. br You can see from the... (show quote)

I hope everyone here understands the water vapor feedback mechanism that makes H2O the most important greenhouse gas. Although CO2's atmospheric concentration is only 0.0415% (e.g., 415 ppm) and water vapor's is 0.219% (at 90° F and 70% humidity), the additional heat (infrared radiation) absorbed by CO2 allows more water vapor to be absorbed, which heats the atmosphere even more, allowing more C02 and water vapor to be absorbed. This spiraling infrared absorption feedback loop works with other greenhouse gases, such that a 1° C increase caused by CO2 ends up being as much as 3°C.
Relevant articles:
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
https://skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/climatesciencenarratives/its-water-vapor-not-the-co2.html
CO2 also absorbs infrared at a slightly different wavelength compared to water vapor (thus increasing the range of total infrared absorption): https://images.app.goo.gl/Dt7VWptjE4YH3Nu69

You're welcome!

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 09:23:19   #
jhf3 Loc: VA
 
jhf3 wrote:
I hope everyone here understands the water vapor feedback mechanism that makes H2O the most important greenhouse gas. Although CO2's atmospheric concentration is only 0.0415% (e.g., 415 ppm) and water vapor's is 0.219% (at 90° F and 70% humidity), the additional heat (infrared radiation) absorbed by CO2 allows more water vapor to be absorbed, which heats the atmosphere even more, allowing more C02 and water vapor to be absorbed. This spiraling infrared absorption feedback loop works with other greenhouse gases, such that a 1° C increase caused by CO2 ends up being as much as 3°C.
Relevant articles:
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
https://skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/climatesciencenarratives/its-water-vapor-not-the-co2.html
CO2 also absorbs infrared at a slightly different wavelength compared to water vapor (thus increasing the range of total infrared absorption): https://images.app.goo.gl/Dt7VWptjE4YH3Nu69

You're welcome!
I hope everyone here understands the water vapor f... (show quote)

Correction: Water vapor concentration at 90゚F and 70% humidity is 2.19% by weight. (Atmospheric water vapor percentages range from 0 to 4% w/w.)

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2019 09:25:01   #
jhf3 Loc: VA
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Not long ago you declared you had made your last post. Another Liberal lie. Why am I not surprised?

That's definitely my last.

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 09:33:00   #
Mikeyavelli
 
jhf3 wrote:
I hope everyone here understands the water vapor feedback mechanism that makes H2O the most important greenhouse gas. Although CO2's atmospheric concentration is only 0.0415% (e.g., 415 ppm) and water vapor's is 0.219% (at 90° F and 70% humidity), the additional heat (infrared radiation) absorbed by CO2 allows more water vapor to be absorbed, which heats the atmosphere even more, allowing more C02 and water vapor to be absorbed. This spiraling infrared absorption feedback loop works with other greenhouse gases, such that a 1° C increase caused by CO2 ends up being as much as 3°C.
Relevant articles:
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
https://skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/climatesciencenarratives/its-water-vapor-not-the-co2.html
CO2 also absorbs infrared at a slightly different wavelength compared to water vapor (thus increasing the range of total infrared absorption): https://images.app.goo.gl/Dt7VWptjE4YH3Nu69

You're welcome!
I hope everyone here understands the water vapor f... (show quote)


I'll just add some bonded Bourbon to it and wait it out.

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 09:53:48   #
Cuda2020
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I invested in t*********red Porto potties in San Francisco. I'm making a fortune. But the straights and merely gays use the streets as usual in San Francisco.


Invested in T*********r Porto potties??? Dude that doesn't exist, a Porto potty is first come first serve, just like your Jon at home, no g****r title required, what are you trying to sell here? The straights and gays? So what you're saying here is EVERYONE pisses in the streets?

Reply
Jul 23, 2019 10:01:52   #
Cuda2020
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Not long ago you declared you had made your last post. Another Liberal lie. Why am I not surprised?


You righty's like to live in your own vacuums, why am I not surprised. You all won't be happy until this is an only rightwing forum and all you ever hear are your own words bouncing off of each other, that's pretty fn pathetic, but most probably what you WILL get, then this forum will be boring as all hell and fold up, Kudos to you all.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.