One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Homosexuality is a sin, is it not?
Page <<first <prev 39 of 42 next> last>>
Jul 19, 2019 02:29:31   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
PeterS wrote:
Please read the Bible? Read our constitution. We are a secular nation and have been one since our founding. We don't govern our nation by what the bible says and we never have. If someone is a homosexual what the bible says is completely irrelevant. And other than an exercise in futility why are we even entertaining the idea of homosexuality? If someone is a homosexual that is their business and no one else's. And if we are going to view this through the eye of religion than an omnipotent and omnipresent god would have known the sins of his creation before he even created them! So if god didn't want homosexuals he wouldn't have created them!!!
Please read the Bible? Read our constitution. We a... (show quote)


"If someone is a homosexual that is their business and no one else's."

I wish someone would explain to me why we are inundated with P***e Day, P***e Parades, and all manner of events that flout their gayness if it is only their business and no one else's. I would love nothing more than they keep it to themselves as their business.


"So if God didn't want homosexuals he wouldn't have created them!!!"

Perhaps! Then again, he endowed us with free will, and we have been undergoing evolution for thousands of years. Perhaps Homosexuality is nature's way to deal with overpopulation and achieve sustainable population levels.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 02:29:52   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://www.prageru.com/video/was-america-founded-to-be-secular/

What role should religion play in a free society? More and more people today would answer: none. That would not have been the answer of the Founders of the United States – the men who fought the American Revolution and wrote the country’s Constitution.

To them the issue of religion and freedom were inextricably linked. You couldn’t have freedom without religion. In fact, the political philosophy of the Founders necessitated a divine foundation.

Thomas Jefferson makes this clear in the Declaration of Independence when he writes that “all men…are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” The purpose of government, Jefferson and his compatriots believed, was not to bestow rights; rather, it was to protect those rights already endowed upon human beings by God.

But government isn’t enough for a free society. A moral people is also required; that is, a people moral enough to police itself. “Virtue or morality,” George Washington observed, “is a necessary spring of popular government.” Thus, for the Founders, liberty was not merely the ability to do what one wanted; it came with moral demands and boundaries.

They all accepted the rule of life expressed by Benjamin Franklin: “Nothing brings more pain than too much pleasure; nothing more bondage than too much liberty.”

The Founders knew that the absolute enemy of freedom was – ironically – a freedom that was absolute and unrestrained. And where was this restraint going to come from? Their answer was religion, which for them – because of when and where they lived – was some variety of Christianity.

“Let Divines, and Philosophers, Statesmen and Patriots unite,” Samuel Adams wrote, “[in] instructing [citizens] in the Art of self-government…in short, of leading them in the Study, and Practice of the exalted Virtues of the Christian system.”

The Christian system to which Adams refers is composed of Judeo-Christian values – the values rooted in the Old and New Testaments, both of which were referred to by the Founders with equal conviction and frequency.

Jefferson – yes, the very same Thomas Jefferson who is so often portrayed as anti-religious – confirmed this sentiment in his Notes on the State of Virginia, when he asked: “[C]an the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God? [And] that they are not to be violated but with his wrath?”

James Madison likewise affirmed the essential connection between religion and morality: “The belief in a God All Powerful, wise, and good is. . . essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man. . . .”

John Adams believed that “the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe,” a doctrine he credited to Judaism, was the “great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization.” And he applied this thinking specifically to the new nation he helped to create: “Our Constitution,” he said, “was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

As President, he replied to a letter from university students in a way that would surprise many today: “Science, liberty, and religion . . . have an inseparable union. Without their joint influence no society can be great, flourishing, or happy.”

Meanwhile another Founder, Alexander Hamilton, looked at the French Revolution and saw something much different. That revolution, unlike the American Revolution, had devolved into violence and chaos. Hamilton believed he understood why. The anti-religious force it unleashed, he wrote, “annihilates the foundations of social order and true liberty, confounds all moral distinctions and substitutes [for] the mild and beneficent religion of the Gospel a gloomy, persecuting, and desolating atheism.”

For the Founders, a free society divorced from religion simply could not work and would not survive. It is no wonder then that in his Farewell Address, George Washington chastised those who would claim to be patriots, and yet undermine the influence of religion: “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.”

The Founders did not demand that anyone believe in any particular religion or even in God – quite the contrary. But while they understood the value of a secular government, they feared a secular society – one without religion.

So should we.
https://www.prageru.com/video/was-america-founded-... (show quote)
MY man, good job, bro, Bravo!

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 02:33:55   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
MY man, good job, bro, Bravo!




I'm really getting tired of these i***ts that think they know everything, aren't you?. They are so aggravating, especially to those of us who do know everything. LOL

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2019 08:34:17   #
zillaorange
 
dtucker300 wrote:
"If someone is a homosexual that is their business and no one else's."

I wish someone would explain to me why we are inundated with P***e Day, P***e Parades, and all manner of events that flout their gayness if it is only their business and no one else's. I would love nothing more than they keep it to themselves as their business.


"So if God didn't want homosexuals he wouldn't have created them!!!"

Perhaps! Then again, he endowed us with free will, and we have been undergoing evolution for thousands of years. Perhaps Homosexuality is nature's way to deal with overpopulation and achieve sustainable population levels.
"If someone is a homosexual that is their bus... (show quote)


Maybe we should have a " Heterosexual P***e Day". What the hell, throw in a parade as well !!!

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 09:18:43   #
Rose42
 
dtucker300 wrote:


I'm really getting tired of these i***ts that think they know everything, aren't you?. They are so aggravating, especially to those of us who do know everything. LOL
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


LOL! Good job.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 12:43:17   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://www.prageru.com/video/was-america-founded-to-be-secular/

What role should religion play in a free society? More and more people today would answer: none. That would not have been the answer of the Founders of the United States – the men who fought the American Revolution and wrote the country’s Constitution.

To them the issue of religion and freedom were inextricably linked. You couldn’t have freedom without religion. In fact, the political philosophy of the Founders necessitated a divine foundation.

Thomas Jefferson makes this clear in the Declaration of Independence when he writes that “all men…are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” The purpose of government, Jefferson and his compatriots believed, was not to bestow rights; rather, it was to protect those rights already endowed upon human beings by God.

But government isn’t enough for a free society. A moral people is also required; that is, a people moral enough to police itself. “Virtue or morality,” George Washington observed, “is a necessary spring of popular government.” Thus, for the Founders, liberty was not merely the ability to do what one wanted; it came with moral demands and boundaries.

They all accepted the rule of life expressed by Benjamin Franklin: “Nothing brings more pain than too much pleasure; nothing more bondage than too much liberty.”

The Founders knew that the absolute enemy of freedom was – ironically – a freedom that was absolute and unrestrained. And where was this restraint going to come from? Their answer was religion, which for them – because of when and where they lived – was some variety of Christianity.

“Let Divines, and Philosophers, Statesmen and Patriots unite,” Samuel Adams wrote, “[in] instructing [citizens] in the Art of self-government…in short, of leading them in the Study, and Practice of the exalted Virtues of the Christian system.”

The Christian system to which Adams refers is composed of Judeo-Christian values – the values rooted in the Old and New Testaments, both of which were referred to by the Founders with equal conviction and frequency.

Jefferson – yes, the very same Thomas Jefferson who is so often portrayed as anti-religious – confirmed this sentiment in his Notes on the State of Virginia, when he asked: “[C]an the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God? [And] that they are not to be violated but with his wrath?”

James Madison likewise affirmed the essential connection between religion and morality: “The belief in a God All Powerful, wise, and good is. . . essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man. . . .”

John Adams believed that “the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe,” a doctrine he credited to Judaism, was the “great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization.” And he applied this thinking specifically to the new nation he helped to create: “Our Constitution,” he said, “was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

As President, he replied to a letter from university students in a way that would surprise many today: “Science, liberty, and religion . . . have an inseparable union. Without their joint influence no society can be great, flourishing, or happy.”

Meanwhile another Founder, Alexander Hamilton, looked at the French Revolution and saw something much different. That revolution, unlike the American Revolution, had devolved into violence and chaos. Hamilton believed he understood why. The anti-religious force it unleashed, he wrote, “annihilates the foundations of social order and true liberty, confounds all moral distinctions and substitutes [for] the mild and beneficent religion of the Gospel a gloomy, persecuting, and desolating atheism.”

For the Founders, a free society divorced from religion simply could not work and would not survive. It is no wonder then that in his Farewell Address, George Washington chastised those who would claim to be patriots, and yet undermine the influence of religion: “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.”

The Founders did not demand that anyone believe in any particular religion or even in God – quite the contrary. But while they understood the value of a secular government, they feared a secular society – one without religion.

So should we.
https://www.prageru.com/video/was-america-founded-... (show quote)

While I appreciate your historical screed, I must point out that the ultimate enforcer of any moral creed is the government under which it is established. That is the ultimate and immediate stick which cudgels people into submission to the civil and criminal laws. The carrot is (for the religiously inclined) is the promise of heaven, forty-seven virgins or wh**ever. For those that do not partake of the religious moral code, it is only the government that keeps the society in order with enforceable laws.
When one religion takes control of the government, they always tend to try to enforce their own morality on the entire population. The lessons of history show this a multitude of times. If the people that disagree have nowhere to go to escape this, it is a constant thorn in both their and the government's side.
There are a few basic tenets that show up throughout history as moral values that every society has adopted; namely prohibitions against murder, theft, lying and bonking your neighbor's wife. Other than this, there are not too many similarities in the moral codes of the various religions. These are also the bedrock of keeping a society civil.
When societies go beyond these all-encompassing basic values, they tend to oppress minorities and their own population. That is all too clear in the Chinese suppression of the Ugher(sp) Moslem population in western China. It is also clear in the suppression of Christian believers in Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other Middle East countries. It almost always happens, when a government becomes a theocracy.
It happened in our own country, as is chronicled in your post above. The CofE was a virtual theocracy that forced the Protestants to either submit or move ... creating the religious colonies that eventually became the United States. Since they couldn't agree on dogma (which governed the government as well in each state), the Constitution did indeed include the First Amendment regarding religion. It is interesting to note that not all of the states agreed to that amendment, since their own state constitutions included much of their religious morals, and they were loathe to give up that strict conduct set of laws.
All in all, to attempt to go back to a set of moral codes such as Rhode Island or Massachusetts had in the 1600's is to attempt to circumvent the First Amendment. Whether you like it or not, we are going multi-cultural and there's no getting around that. And to attempt to force all of these diverse segments of the population into a "Christian" mold is doomed to ultimate failure unless you want to form a theocracy. That's not something that I want to see, and neither will most others.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 16:50:28   #
PeterS
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Yes PeterS, Please do, read the Bible, and the Constitution. You appear to be bright. Then you open your mouth removing all doubt, thus proving that light travels faster than sound. You don't understand what "secular" means.

https://www.prageru.com/video/religious-tolerance-made-in-america/

Each year the President of the United States lights a national Christmas tree, hosts a Hanukkah party at the White House and issues a proclamation honoring Ramadan. Only in America.

Indeed, America is known for religious tolerance. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say that America, where people of all faiths are free to worship (or not worship) as they please, invented modern religious tolerance. This tolerance, which Americans take for granted, didn't exist anywhere in the world before America invented it. How did this happen?

To answer that we have to look to America's origins which were overwhelmingly religious and, to be precise, overwhelmingly Christian. To put it another way, America became the religiously open nation that we know today because it was first a Christian nation, specifically a Protestant one.
Yes PeterS, Please do, read the Bible, and the Con... (show quote)

So your argument is that Protestant Christianity allows for us to worship one god of our choice, many gods of our choice, or no gods of our choosing at all??? Where in the Protestant Bible are we given such freedom? I agree that ours was a nation that was always open religiously but not because it was Christian but because it was secular.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2019 17:10:40   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
MY man, good job, bro, Bravo!

So while we are applauding the work of others where in that Evangelical bible of your's are we allowed the choice of one god, many gods, or no god at all, as we are allowed via our Constitution? You need to be careful here that you don't paint yourself into a corner. It is understood that our constitution supports our religious freedom but there is nowhere in the bible that allows us to choose any god that we want...we do so at the possible peril of our soul...

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 17:18:57   #
PeterS
 
dtucker300 wrote:
"If someone is a homosexual that is their business and no one else's."

I wish someone would explain to me why we are inundated with P***e Day, P***e Parades, and all manner of events that flout their gayness if it is only their business and no one else's. I would love nothing more than they keep it to themselves as their business.


"So if God didn't want homosexuals he wouldn't have created them!!!"

Perhaps! Then again, he endowed us with free will, and we have been undergoing evolution for thousands of years. Perhaps Homosexuality is nature's way to deal with overpopulation and achieve sustainable population levels.
"If someone is a homosexual that is their bus... (show quote)

I h**e to say it but I've never watched a gay parade or gay event at all...so if you don't attend a gay event or watch one how is it possible for them to flaunt their 'gayness' in a way that would offensive?

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 17:40:38   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
PeterS wrote:
I h**e to say it but I've never watched a gay parade or gay event at all...so if you don't attend a gay event or watch one how is it possible for them to flaunt their 'gayness' in a way that would offensive?


Neither have I. But the news media and corporate America loves them. You don't get out much, do you?

1) 40 years ago; it was we want to be left alone to live our lives without being bothered.
2) 30 years ago; it was what we do in our bedroom is personal, private, and nobody else's business.
3) 20 years ago; it was we should be able to live with and love anyone we choose without discrimination or prejudice in the workplace or public.
4) 10 years ago; it was we demand civil unions be recognized so our significant other can share our legal rights, receive healthcare, have power of attorney, inheritance, and such.
5) Now; we want to be married and have all the perks and benefits of this recognized by society and government even though this changes the historical and religious meaning of marriage as it has been defined since man first spoke.

We want to be considered a special class of citizens, deserving of special protections, even though our rights, freedoms, liberty, and protections in the past were the same as everyone else's.

If you don't bake our cake we will destroy you, your family and your livelihood, and make you pay, and pay, and pay, even though it would have been more prudent and supportive of those who embrace our lifestyle, to go to a baker who shares our way of life.

Incrementalism. What's next? You're not allowed to have an opinion or say what you want for fear of the PC police.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 17:49:35   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whitnebrat wrote:
While I appreciate your historical screed, I must point out that the ultimate enforcer of any moral creed is the government under which it is established.
The government is the enforcer of morality???? Really? From what source does a government obtain the concepts of morality that it enforces???

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2019 17:53:40   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
PeterS wrote:
So your argument is that Protestant Christianity allows for us to worship one god of our choice, many gods of our choice, or no gods of our choosing at all??? Where in the Protestant Bible are we given such freedom? I agree that ours was a nation that was always open religiously but not because it was Christian but because it was secular.


Not at all. You can worship as many gods as you want or none at all. This is why we have the Second amendment.

Incidentally, the First Commandment says;

"I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Thou shalt have no other gods before me."


Interesting. God did not say, "I am the only God," but rather that he is Number One. God doesn't even say don't worship any other god, only not to put another god before him.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 17:56:16   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
PeterS wrote:
So your argument is that Protestant Christianity allows for us to worship one god of our choice, many gods of our choice, or no gods of our choosing at all??? Where in the Protestant Bible are we given such freedom? I agree that ours was a nation that was always open religiously but not because it was Christian but because it was secular.


It doesn't matter because it is the Constitution that gives you that right, which is derived from God and Nature's law.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 18:01:07   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
So while we are applauding the work of others where in that Evangelical bible of your's are we allowed the choice of one god, many gods, or no god at all, as we are allowed via our Constitution? You need to be careful here that you don't paint yourself into a corner. It is understood that our constitution supports our religious freedom but there is nowhere in the bible that allows us to choose any god that we want...we do so at the possible peril of our soul...


"If it is disagreeable in your sight to serve the LORD, choose for yourselves today whom you will serve: whether the gods which your fathers served which were beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you are living; but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD."
Joshua 24

Let not your heart be troubled, Pete, pick wh**ever god you want and worship it. Or not.

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 18:21:06   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The government is the enforcer of morality???? Really? From what source does a government obtain the concepts of morality that it enforces???

OK, if I were to have no religious affiliation, and (by your definition) no moral character, what besides the government is there to keep me from murdering, stealing, etc.? The entire social structure depends on government as enforcer of morals for those that choose not to have moral character and violate social norms. And in many cases, such as public nudity, Sunday closing laws, wearing of a hijab, control of alcoholic beverages, etc ... these are moral laws that have nothing to do with public good or safety. That's why I say that the government is the enforcer of morality, in addition to the "public good."
The only universal t***sgressions are those contained in every religious text as edicts or commandments (murder, theft, lying, etc.) which every society observes as necessary to maintain order. All else is determined by local customs and religion, enforced by the majority rule of the area. In a multi-cultural society, those "customs and religion" must be relegated to those members of the society that choose to observe their own particular brand, not enforced for the society as a whole. If your particular sect of religion requires that men wear beards and black hats (as an example), you would probably object unless you were in that particular sect. And you would probably become belligerent if you were required by law to do the same. T***slate that to the general public of our nation, and we have to be careful to not stomp on other people's lives and lifestyles.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 39 of 42 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.