One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Gun Bans Put Women At Greater Risk
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: 1 2 next>>
Jul 11, 2019 13:11:06   #
Larry the Legend
 
Gun bans disarm innocent women, making them tempting targets for criminals. According to Bob Morse:

"That is only one of the ways that gun-control leaves women at greater risk." Here's some more:

https://clashdaily.com/2019/07/gun-control-puts-women-at-risk/

"Politicians support gun-control for their benefit, not for ours, and not for the benefit of the women we love. That is easy to see once we know where to look."

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:16:22   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Gun bans disarm innocent women, making them tempting targets for criminals. According to Bob Morse:

"That is only one of the ways that gun-control leaves women at greater risk." Here's some more:

https://clashdaily.com/2019/07/gun-control-puts-women-at-risk/

"Politicians support gun-control for their benefit, not for ours, and not for the benefit of the women we love. That is easy to see once we know where to look."


Might as well put a sign on the young ladies to wear on their backs, "I'm a gun free, defenseless female. Please don't hurt me."

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:24:35   #
Larry the Legend
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Might as well put a sign on the young ladies to wear on their backs, "I'm a gun free, defenseless female. Please don't hurt me."

Why not, they do it at schools, courthouses, federal buildings, etc. Seen this? Read the small print. This is a sign I spotted outside the target rich environment Santa Rosa County courthouse in Milton, FL.



| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:30:51   #
Noraa
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Gun bans disarm innocent women, making them tempting targets for criminals. According to Bob Morse:

"That is only one of the ways that gun-control leaves women at greater risk." Here's some more:

https://clashdaily.com/2019/07/gun-control-puts-women-at-risk/

"Politicians support gun-control for their benefit, not for ours, and not for the benefit of the women we love. That is easy to see once we know where to look."


Thankfully I live in Kansas!

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:32:35   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Why not, they do it at schools, courthouses, federal buildings, etc. Seen this? Read the small print. This is a sign I spotted outside the target rich environment Santa Rosa County courthouse in Milton, FL.


Even worse are the little "gun free zone" signs with no metal detection at all.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:50:51   #
Larry the Legend
 
Noraa wrote:
Thankfully I live in Kansas!

Ah, the Land of the Free!

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:54:04   #
Larry the Legend
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Even worse are the little "gun free zone" signs with no metal detection at all.

Yeah, the ones where you're fine until you are forced to defend yourself or someone else, then you're in deep doo-doo for having it with you. Forget the lives you saved, you 'broke a rule', now Go to jail, go directly to jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $200.

What morons.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 13:59:22   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Yeah, the ones where you're fine until you are forced to defend yourself or someone else, then you're in deep doo-doo for having it with you. Forget the lives you saved, you 'broke a rule', now Go to jail, go directly to jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $200.

What morons.


Exactly!

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 14:10:03   #
Larry the Legend
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Exactly!

I remember when rules were there for good reason. There is no good reason for those 'gun free' zones. None whatsoever. They even had to use the commerce clause to get around SCOTUS challenges:

"It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone." Now, what does possession of a firearm, anywhere, have to do with "Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."

Ah, they say, but it crossed State lines...

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 14:30:13   #
Noraa
 
The only one's bringing guns into school zones are whackos who are going to get a gun regardless of all the gun bans.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 14:36:24   #
Larry the Legend
 
Noraa wrote:
The only one's bringing guns into school zones are whackos who are going to get a gun regardless of all the gun bans.

That's not the point. Even if they legally own a firearm, there is nothing stopping some nutjob from shooting up a target rich environment gun free zone long before the cops even get the call. Like the old saying goes, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

By the way, this carbuncle on the face of humanity was signed into law by GHW Bush, of all people.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 16:02:55   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Noraa wrote:
The only one's bringing guns into school zones are whackos who are going to get a gun regardless of all the gun bans.


And that is the point that is always made and the one totally ignored by the left. It's the Achilles heel in their thinking!

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 16:04:07   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
That's not the point. Even if they legally own a firearm, there is nothing stopping some nutjob from shooting up a target rich environment gun free zone long before the cops even get the call. Like the old saying goes, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

By the way, this carbuncle on the face of humanity was signed into law by GHW Bush, of all people.


GHW Bush was not a conservative. he was a politician, first and foremost. He signed that to pander a bit to the libs.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 16:43:13   #
Larry the Legend
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
GHW Bush was not a conservative. he was a politician, first and foremost. He signed that to pander a bit to the libs.

Gee, it's really nice of him to be so 'bipartisan'. 30 years later and the 'pander' is still going strong, I think that's a bit much.

| Reply
Jul 11, 2019 16:57:01   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Gee, it's really nice of him to be so 'bipartisan'. 30 years later and the 'pander' is still going strong, I think that's a bit much.


I don't get it.

| Reply
Page: 1 2 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.