The Left's Endgame Is Not Chaos: It's Worse
Jul 4, 2019 09:29:24 #
The Left's Endgame Is Not Chaos: It's Worse
Robert Vincent ~ July 3, 2019
On an episode of The Candace Owens Show that aired this past May, Owens had as her guest Dennis Prager. While I agreed with most of the points made by both Ms. Owens and Mr. Prager, one item struck me as an example of superficial analysis. They declared that the primary objective of the Left is "chaos." In an immediate sense, this seems true; the so-called "progressive left" does appear to be deliberately sowing chaos in America today.
However, I submit that the Left's "chaos" is an intermediate objective, the means to an end. They have a well-defined endgame. The C*******t Bloc countries were a lot of things, but they were generally not chaotic. They were highly regimented societies, and while they did not have the material standard of living or political freedoms enjoyed in the West, there were some agreeable aspects, as related by the wife of one Carlo Alcos in an online feature story on the Matador Network about her early childhood experiences growing up in East Germany:
It wasn't all trying, though. Everyone had a job, school lunches were free, after-school care was free, people were generally happy, necessities were extremely cheap, and there was more community spirit than there is nowadays. In those times, there were no Joneses to keep up with.
Rigidly c*******t East Germany hardly sounded like "chaos." So what is the progressive left's game in the Era of Trump?
First, at present, l*****ts want to create a state of political cultural chaos in the U.S. for a specific reason. They need chaos as a smokescreen to defend their current leaders — that is to say, Obama, Hillary & Co. — from prosecution. Make no mistake: Obama, Hillary, and their cohorts committed some serious crimes of an unprecedented nature for people at their level. We executed Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for far less. Their degree of culpability is suggested in an October 2016 email from Hilary Clinton to then DNC Chair Donna Brazile, revealed by WikiLeaks, in which Hillary shrieked to the effect that "if that f‑‑‑‑‑‑ b‑‑‑‑‑‑ wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this s‑‑‑!"
Consider the metaphor of a dogfight between two fighter planes. One is firmly camped on the six o'clock of the other, ready to deliver the deathblow. The other, facing imminent destruction, engages in all manner of crazy maneuvers in order to prevent his adversary from achieving a firing solution. That is what the Left is doing with all this "chaos." For if Trump gets enough political breathing space to lock on for the k**l and hold them accountable, they are through. Their whole program is derailed, and many principals will indeed wind up in jail.
What is the agenda of the Left, if it is not simply chaos?
L*****ts rationalize what they are doing as being in the service of what will ultimately be a Star Trek–like "United Earth," a one-world community ruled by the bureaucrats of the U.N., where there will be no more war, all resources will be shared, all conflicts will be "managed," and the "masses" will be doled out wh**ever the elites decree the latter "needs" in return for World Peace Forevermore. In real day-to-day terms, this enables an unaccountable, parasitic g*******t elite class to decide what is best for everybody. Ultimately, the progressive left elites of the West are busy selling out their own countries in order to appease the other major actors on the world stage, especially China and political Islam, to get the latter to cooperate in this g*******t fantasy.
In reality, China; political Islam; and the other major independent political actor, Russia, will merely pocket the concessions of the West and continue to pursue their particular interests, in traditional great power fashion, at the West's expense. The corrupt Western elites who have sold their souls for this paradigm don't really care, as they fundamentally do not believe that what the West represents is worth fighting for. In short, what these corrupt g*******t Western elites are engaged in is a highly rationalized form of treason.
There are many collateral policies to this overall goal. Three prominent issues include:
Israel: In order to get political Islam on board the g*******t train, the price the Islamists ask is to get rid of Israel. This really won't make the Islamists any more peaceful or cooperative; it will instead embolden them. But traditionally anti-Semitic segments of Western elites are happy to rationalize the need to force Israel into a suicidal "peace deal" — or worse, if Israel balks, to satisfy the bloodlust of her immediate adversaries...in the service of "World Peace," of course.
Gun control: Imagine the Yellow Vest movement in France with American-level private gun ownership. Civilian gun-owners can't hope to defeat a modern military intent on simply destroying them, but if the objective is control and ens***ement, that complicates matters (just ask the governor of Oregon). A bunch of corpses can't create wealth for the parasite g*******t elite class to feed on. That is why the Left wants our guns so, so badly.
A******n/L**T: The Left offers unlimited sexual freedom as a substitute for political freedom. The Left holds out traditional sexual roles and mores as a form of "bondage," of "restriction." Why was it called the "sexual revolution"? When people are encouraged to indulge in much of this nonsense in the context of making a "political statement," this is intended to make whoever is doing this to feel "free"...but the price of this "freedom" is to uncritically accept all of the other political positions of the Left. That is why, for example, it is not acknowledged by the Left when President Trump appoints an openly gay ambassador to Germany; that concession to "sexual freedom" doesn't "count" if someone on the wrong side of the political fence does it. Sexual freedom, in what passes for public discourse in the mass media and academia today, is the monopoly of the Left.
Writ large, what the self-styled "progressive left" is selling amounts to a modern version of feudalism, in which a self-appointed elite, whose status is maintained by the promotion of a self-serving "progressive," neo-Marxist dogma, is anointed to tell the rest of us peasants how we must live our lives, not unlike the Divine Right of Kings. The Rest of Us will be compelled to create wealth for them, as they enjoy an opulent existence without earning it; the likes of Obama, Hillary, Macron, Merkel, etc., couldn't produce something genuinely useful if their lives depended on it. In their world, over-educated uselessness becomes a virtue, as they are simply "above" having to produce anything. It certainly beats actual work.
That is what the Left wants. It isn't chaos. It is integration into global feudalism. In the end, if they are "successful," American society will be saddled with a permanent belligerent parasite immigrant class (brought about by "open borders"), a greatly reduced standard of living for most citizens, our Constitution made an irrelevant relic, Islamism unbound, and subservience to a China-dominated world.
Robert Vincent ~ July 3, 2019
On an episode of The Candace Owens Show that aired this past May, Owens had as her guest Dennis Prager. While I agreed with most of the points made by both Ms. Owens and Mr. Prager, one item struck me as an example of superficial analysis. They declared that the primary objective of the Left is "chaos." In an immediate sense, this seems true; the so-called "progressive left" does appear to be deliberately sowing chaos in America today.
However, I submit that the Left's "chaos" is an intermediate objective, the means to an end. They have a well-defined endgame. The C*******t Bloc countries were a lot of things, but they were generally not chaotic. They were highly regimented societies, and while they did not have the material standard of living or political freedoms enjoyed in the West, there were some agreeable aspects, as related by the wife of one Carlo Alcos in an online feature story on the Matador Network about her early childhood experiences growing up in East Germany:
It wasn't all trying, though. Everyone had a job, school lunches were free, after-school care was free, people were generally happy, necessities were extremely cheap, and there was more community spirit than there is nowadays. In those times, there were no Joneses to keep up with.
Rigidly c*******t East Germany hardly sounded like "chaos." So what is the progressive left's game in the Era of Trump?
First, at present, l*****ts want to create a state of political cultural chaos in the U.S. for a specific reason. They need chaos as a smokescreen to defend their current leaders — that is to say, Obama, Hillary & Co. — from prosecution. Make no mistake: Obama, Hillary, and their cohorts committed some serious crimes of an unprecedented nature for people at their level. We executed Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for far less. Their degree of culpability is suggested in an October 2016 email from Hilary Clinton to then DNC Chair Donna Brazile, revealed by WikiLeaks, in which Hillary shrieked to the effect that "if that f‑‑‑‑‑‑ b‑‑‑‑‑‑ wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this s‑‑‑!"
Consider the metaphor of a dogfight between two fighter planes. One is firmly camped on the six o'clock of the other, ready to deliver the deathblow. The other, facing imminent destruction, engages in all manner of crazy maneuvers in order to prevent his adversary from achieving a firing solution. That is what the Left is doing with all this "chaos." For if Trump gets enough political breathing space to lock on for the k**l and hold them accountable, they are through. Their whole program is derailed, and many principals will indeed wind up in jail.
What is the agenda of the Left, if it is not simply chaos?
L*****ts rationalize what they are doing as being in the service of what will ultimately be a Star Trek–like "United Earth," a one-world community ruled by the bureaucrats of the U.N., where there will be no more war, all resources will be shared, all conflicts will be "managed," and the "masses" will be doled out wh**ever the elites decree the latter "needs" in return for World Peace Forevermore. In real day-to-day terms, this enables an unaccountable, parasitic g*******t elite class to decide what is best for everybody. Ultimately, the progressive left elites of the West are busy selling out their own countries in order to appease the other major actors on the world stage, especially China and political Islam, to get the latter to cooperate in this g*******t fantasy.
In reality, China; political Islam; and the other major independent political actor, Russia, will merely pocket the concessions of the West and continue to pursue their particular interests, in traditional great power fashion, at the West's expense. The corrupt Western elites who have sold their souls for this paradigm don't really care, as they fundamentally do not believe that what the West represents is worth fighting for. In short, what these corrupt g*******t Western elites are engaged in is a highly rationalized form of treason.
There are many collateral policies to this overall goal. Three prominent issues include:
Israel: In order to get political Islam on board the g*******t train, the price the Islamists ask is to get rid of Israel. This really won't make the Islamists any more peaceful or cooperative; it will instead embolden them. But traditionally anti-Semitic segments of Western elites are happy to rationalize the need to force Israel into a suicidal "peace deal" — or worse, if Israel balks, to satisfy the bloodlust of her immediate adversaries...in the service of "World Peace," of course.
Gun control: Imagine the Yellow Vest movement in France with American-level private gun ownership. Civilian gun-owners can't hope to defeat a modern military intent on simply destroying them, but if the objective is control and ens***ement, that complicates matters (just ask the governor of Oregon). A bunch of corpses can't create wealth for the parasite g*******t elite class to feed on. That is why the Left wants our guns so, so badly.
A******n/L**T: The Left offers unlimited sexual freedom as a substitute for political freedom. The Left holds out traditional sexual roles and mores as a form of "bondage," of "restriction." Why was it called the "sexual revolution"? When people are encouraged to indulge in much of this nonsense in the context of making a "political statement," this is intended to make whoever is doing this to feel "free"...but the price of this "freedom" is to uncritically accept all of the other political positions of the Left. That is why, for example, it is not acknowledged by the Left when President Trump appoints an openly gay ambassador to Germany; that concession to "sexual freedom" doesn't "count" if someone on the wrong side of the political fence does it. Sexual freedom, in what passes for public discourse in the mass media and academia today, is the monopoly of the Left.
Writ large, what the self-styled "progressive left" is selling amounts to a modern version of feudalism, in which a self-appointed elite, whose status is maintained by the promotion of a self-serving "progressive," neo-Marxist dogma, is anointed to tell the rest of us peasants how we must live our lives, not unlike the Divine Right of Kings. The Rest of Us will be compelled to create wealth for them, as they enjoy an opulent existence without earning it; the likes of Obama, Hillary, Macron, Merkel, etc., couldn't produce something genuinely useful if their lives depended on it. In their world, over-educated uselessness becomes a virtue, as they are simply "above" having to produce anything. It certainly beats actual work.
That is what the Left wants. It isn't chaos. It is integration into global feudalism. In the end, if they are "successful," American society will be saddled with a permanent belligerent parasite immigrant class (brought about by "open borders"), a greatly reduced standard of living for most citizens, our Constitution made an irrelevant relic, Islamism unbound, and subservience to a China-dominated world.
Jul 4, 2019 09:39:07 #
Parky60 wrote:
b The Left's Endgame Is Not Chaos: It's Worse /b ... (show quote)
Amen and Amen i do believe that you are on the right track with this post. Thanks for posting this.
Jul 4, 2019 09:56:48 #
no propaganda please
Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
bahmer wrote:
Amen and Amen i do believe that you are the right track with this post. Thanks for posting this.
Jul 4, 2019 10:20:20 #
Jul 4, 2019 10:20:30 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Parky60 wrote:
b The Left's Endgame Is Not Chaos: It's Worse /b ... (show quote)
F**e news lol The Left wants better access to affordable healthcare The left also wants unions to level the playing field from big companies The right has no answer to healthcare wants big business to get bigger and doesn't care about the working man. now that is the differance between right and left in a nut shell I am not talking about far right or far left Trump is Far right and Bernie and AOC are far left We as America need to be more towards the middle
Jul 4, 2019 11:36:40 #
Chaos is what trump sows with his scandel a week one day his scandals will catch up with him.
Jul 4, 2019 15:25:03 #
Lonewolf wrote:
Chaos is what trump sows with his scandel a week one day his scandals will catch up with him.
There are none so blind as those that will not see.
Jul 4, 2019 15:34:24 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Parky60 wrote:
There are none so blind as those that will not see.
You must be talking about the Trumpster's lol
Jul 4, 2019 15:47:23 #
jimpack123 wrote:
You must be talking about the Trumpster's lol
Now that I think about it, I'm speaking to you too.
Jul 4, 2019 16:00:34 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Parky60 wrote:
Now that I think about it, I'm speaking to you too.
OH I see just fine I can see that every GOP POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt has had a recession in there first Term. Time will tell if Trump will follow suit. This is from a article from Market watch Do you have a answer to that?
Jul 4, 2019 16:33:29 #
jimpack123 wrote:
OH I see just fine I can see that every GOP POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt has had a recession in there first Term. Time will tell if Trump will follow suit. This is from a article from Market watch Do you have a answer to that?
they are sticking their fingers in their ears right now as they try and find a way to tell their grandkids they will have to pay for trumps tax cuts.
Jul 4, 2019 16:53:10 #
jimpack123 wrote:
OH I see just fine I can see that every GOP POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt has had a recession in there first Term. Time will tell if Trump will follow suit. This is from a article from Market watch Do you have a answer to that?
Just as you guys blamed all of Obammy's problems on his predecessor Bush, every GOP POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt had to follow a Democrat.
Jul 4, 2019 16:54:59 #
Lonewolf wrote:
they are sticking their fingers in their ears right now as they try and find a way to tell their grandkids they will have to pay for trumps tax cuts.
No, they'll have to pay for Obammy doubling the debt from $10 trillion to $20 trillion.
Jul 4, 2019 17:00:41 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Parky60 wrote:
Just as you guys blamed all of Obammy's problems on his predecessor Bush, every GOP POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt had to follow a Democrat.
every one? what about Bush SR, seems to me that he followed Regan or was Regan a Democrat lol
Jul 4, 2019 17:12:07 #
jimpack123 wrote:
every one? what about Bush SR, seems to me that he followed Regan or was Regan a Democrat lol
Of course the sarcasm was lost on you.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.