Ann Coulter's "Swamp in Action" Article
Jun 29, 2019 07:28:31 #
The bomb thrower is at it again, and "good for her". Tell us like it is!
"Everyone else wants the names of the FBI officials who approved the unprecedented law enforcement d**gnet against low-level Trump aides in the middle of a p**********l campaign.
I want the names of the staffers at the Republican National Committee who prepared Trump’s “backgrounders” on potential hires for the new administration. (I’m not interested in finding out who leaked them because I assume it was the Russians.)
When America is no more, future generations are going to want to know who murdered our country.
Below is a random se******n of the i***tic quotes from the RNC’s vetting document on Kris Kobach, when President Trump was considering him for secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Instead of Kobach, who could have saved the country, Trump appointed a series of imbeciles, who managed to engineer the worst immigration crisis in the nation’s history.
If this cretinous document had anything to do with Kobach being passed over, then there are specific people whose names we’re going to need.
QUOTE:
“Immigration Hardliner”
The RNC seems to think “hardliner” means: “supports current federal law, on the books, passed over generations by Republicans and Democrats, negotiating compromises and getting their bills signed into law by a series of presidents in both political parties.”
QUOTE:
“Would you ever allow your support of policies that ‘strengthen’ immigration enforcement (to) conflict with bipartisan compromise legislation negotiated by a Trump administration?”
Who wrote this question? John McCain? Jeb!?
Even after T***p w*n, the RNC proceeded as if nothing had happened and their goal was to pass a new Gang of Eight “Comprehensive Immigration” bill. They wanted Kobach to swear fidelity to a policy that had just been soundly rejected by the v**ers and their own party.
QUOTE:
“Given your history of campaigning on immigration politics, do you believe you have an ability to strike the appropriate tone …?”
Tone! Democrats routinely call Republicans r****ts, liars, warmongers, homophobes, h**ers, rapists, etc., but somehow only conservatives are ever accused of having a “tone” problem.
Again, the RNC seems sublimely unaware of the entire 2016 e******n.
Trump called Mexican immigrants rapists and won. But the RNC is worried about an erudite Midwesterner’s “tone.”
How’s this tone? F— you, RNC.
QUOTE:
“Kobach is credited with helping draft the controversial i*********n l*w allowing Arizona state and local officials to check the immigration status of individuals they stopped …”
“Controversial” is what i***ts say when they don’t have a real complaint.
I can’t be sure about all of them, but by my count, at least 300 of the 400 members of the current Democratic p**********l field support s***ery r********ns, Medicare for all, free college tuition, eliminating I.C.E., t*********rs in women’s bathrooms, a******n at 8.9 months, flinging open our borders and providing free dental care to i******s.
But according to the RNC, supporting i*********n l*ws currently on the books is “controversial.”
I note that it wasn’t “controversial” at the Supreme Court.
QUOTE:
“… (much of the law was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2012).”
The morons at the RNC aren’t even familiar with the landmark Supreme Court ruling they’re citing to bash Kobach.
Dear Useless, Incompetent Twits: The law — I mean, the “controversial” law — “allowing Arizona state and local officials to check the immigration status of individuals they stopped” … was UPHELD BY A UNANIMOUS SUPREME COURT. (Other parts of the law, not mentioned by the RNC or anyone else, were struck down by a divided court with dissents from Trump’s favorite justices: Scalia, Alito and Thomas.)
The RNC: “Much of the law Was Struck Down by the Supreme Court in 2012.”
The New York Times: “Court Splits I*********n L*w Verdicts; Upholds Hotly Debated Centerpiece, 8-0.”
I’m sure any person of reasonable intelligence could confuse “unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court” with “struck down by the Supreme Court.”
https://www.takimag.com/article/the-swamp-in-action/
"Everyone else wants the names of the FBI officials who approved the unprecedented law enforcement d**gnet against low-level Trump aides in the middle of a p**********l campaign.
I want the names of the staffers at the Republican National Committee who prepared Trump’s “backgrounders” on potential hires for the new administration. (I’m not interested in finding out who leaked them because I assume it was the Russians.)
When America is no more, future generations are going to want to know who murdered our country.
Below is a random se******n of the i***tic quotes from the RNC’s vetting document on Kris Kobach, when President Trump was considering him for secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Instead of Kobach, who could have saved the country, Trump appointed a series of imbeciles, who managed to engineer the worst immigration crisis in the nation’s history.
If this cretinous document had anything to do with Kobach being passed over, then there are specific people whose names we’re going to need.
QUOTE:
“Immigration Hardliner”
The RNC seems to think “hardliner” means: “supports current federal law, on the books, passed over generations by Republicans and Democrats, negotiating compromises and getting their bills signed into law by a series of presidents in both political parties.”
QUOTE:
“Would you ever allow your support of policies that ‘strengthen’ immigration enforcement (to) conflict with bipartisan compromise legislation negotiated by a Trump administration?”
Who wrote this question? John McCain? Jeb!?
Even after T***p w*n, the RNC proceeded as if nothing had happened and their goal was to pass a new Gang of Eight “Comprehensive Immigration” bill. They wanted Kobach to swear fidelity to a policy that had just been soundly rejected by the v**ers and their own party.
QUOTE:
“Given your history of campaigning on immigration politics, do you believe you have an ability to strike the appropriate tone …?”
Tone! Democrats routinely call Republicans r****ts, liars, warmongers, homophobes, h**ers, rapists, etc., but somehow only conservatives are ever accused of having a “tone” problem.
Again, the RNC seems sublimely unaware of the entire 2016 e******n.
Trump called Mexican immigrants rapists and won. But the RNC is worried about an erudite Midwesterner’s “tone.”
How’s this tone? F— you, RNC.
QUOTE:
“Kobach is credited with helping draft the controversial i*********n l*w allowing Arizona state and local officials to check the immigration status of individuals they stopped …”
“Controversial” is what i***ts say when they don’t have a real complaint.
I can’t be sure about all of them, but by my count, at least 300 of the 400 members of the current Democratic p**********l field support s***ery r********ns, Medicare for all, free college tuition, eliminating I.C.E., t*********rs in women’s bathrooms, a******n at 8.9 months, flinging open our borders and providing free dental care to i******s.
But according to the RNC, supporting i*********n l*ws currently on the books is “controversial.”
I note that it wasn’t “controversial” at the Supreme Court.
QUOTE:
“… (much of the law was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2012).”
The morons at the RNC aren’t even familiar with the landmark Supreme Court ruling they’re citing to bash Kobach.
Dear Useless, Incompetent Twits: The law — I mean, the “controversial” law — “allowing Arizona state and local officials to check the immigration status of individuals they stopped” … was UPHELD BY A UNANIMOUS SUPREME COURT. (Other parts of the law, not mentioned by the RNC or anyone else, were struck down by a divided court with dissents from Trump’s favorite justices: Scalia, Alito and Thomas.)
The RNC: “Much of the law Was Struck Down by the Supreme Court in 2012.”
The New York Times: “Court Splits I*********n L*w Verdicts; Upholds Hotly Debated Centerpiece, 8-0.”
I’m sure any person of reasonable intelligence could confuse “unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court” with “struck down by the Supreme Court.”
https://www.takimag.com/article/the-swamp-in-action/
Jun 29, 2019 08:31:01 #
ACP45 wrote:
The bomb thrower is at it again, and "good fo... (show quote)
Yep, she doesn't pull punches. The RNC is as bad as the DNC
They're all politicians that put their own personal interests first. Makes for crappy performance in their duty and purpose as representatives of the people IMO. Obstructive and never trumper Republicans are also why President Trump wasn't able to get a WHOLE lot more done the first 2 years of his term. On a side note, I'm surprised Ann got a speaking engagement, her "doing nothing but spouting h**e speech " and all. Damn dirty Swamp
Jun 29, 2019 09:25:40 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.