TommyRadd wrote:
Since when did actual credibility matter to l*****ts? Just a mere accusation by someone of their ideology is, alone, acceptable as unassailable evidence. Note the complete lack of doubt, let alone “benefit of the doubt” in Rumi’s conviction. He seems as sure as if he’d witnessed the event ( which even the accuser said wasn’t a violent attack).
So, we can conclude, l*****ts, according to l*****ts, are considered innocent even when proven guilty, but conservatives, according to l*****ts, are guilty by mere fact of their ideology and no further evidence is required... more like icing than an essential ingredient.
This double standard of theirs explains why Hillary is obviously not guilty of any collusion, in their view, but Trump is, and that’s why Mueller is being subpoenaed- they are looking for icing on their cake, but they aren’t going to get it... anymore than this same strategy of theirs kept Brett Kavanaugh from being a supreme.
A lie, repeated often enough, is all they need to formulate their reality.
Since when did actual credibility matter to l*****... (
show quote)
Lol, what? He admitted--admitted!--paying off Stormy. That should mean complete lack of doubt for you as well. Then there is Access Hollywood tape. You said "He seems as sure as if he’d witnessed the event": millions of people witnessed that event. Wake up!