ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Just like the average American citizen is not directly responsible for the disasters in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other middle eastern countries, the average Jew or Israeli is not responsible for 9-11. Every country has their share of psychopathic leaders, and Israel is no different.

You mistakenly assume that criticism of Israel's psychopathic Z*****t leaders applies to Jews in general, and Israeli's in particular. Not so. We have a number of psychopathic politicians here in the US, who in conjunction with those psychopathic leaders in Israel were the planners and architects of the 9-11 disaster.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Wesley Clark??? Are you fking kidding me?

No, I'm quite serious. What is your problem with Wesley Clark, and why are you so quick to dismiss and demonize him? Is it because he has stated something that you find difficult to believe or accept?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

So you are saying that American Government murdered nearly 3000 citizens???..For what???....Please tell me what would be the reason for such mass murder???

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Let me answer your question this way.

Without some major catalyst that would so inflame the public, it is difficult for any government to enlist popular support for such things as a nation going to war, or getting the public to voluntarily surrender their civil liberties under our constitution.

Consider the following: "Many people do not know that the USA PATRIOT Act was already written and ready to go long before September 11th. Recent criticism of Bush's admission that he had received warnings only weeks before September 11th has made it more important to understand the origins of the USAPA.

The USA PATRIOT Act - the so-called "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001," a.k.a. the USAPA -- was enacted in the immediate wake of 9/11, riding a wave of fear that spread over the nation. This Act has caused much concern amongst civil rights advocates. The Administration, however, responded to such concerns by calling critics unpatriotic. Now, the White House has had a similar response to critics of Bush's recent admission of early warnings."

..........

"Whether the Administration could have anticipated 9/11 or not, the proponents of the USAPA were waiting to go long before that day. Similar antiterrorism legislation was enacted in the 1996 Antiterrorism Act, which however did little to prevent the events of 9/11, and many provisions had either been declared unconstitutional or were about to be repealed when 9/11 occurred.

James X. Dempsey and David Cole state in their book, "Terrorism & the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security," that the most troubling provisions of the pre-USAPA anti-terrorism laws, enacted in 1996 and expanded now by the USAPA, "were developed long before the bombings that triggered their final enactment."

"More specifically, however, Dempsey and Cole show that it was the Reagan Administration which initially proposed some of the most troubling provisions which eventually became part of the USAPA. When Reagan proposed these provisions, Congress rejected them on constitutional grounds. The first Bush Administration then made similar proposals, which were again rejected by lawmakers. Congress twice refused to enact the secret evidence provisions proposed by Bush I. (Indeed, just prior to 9/11, Congress was about to pass a law repealing the secret evidence provisions of the 1996 Antiterrorism Act.)"

When you consider the loss of personal freedoms under the Patriot Act, and add to that the Pentagon planning for wars against 7 middle eastern countries (all of which have come to pass except Iran, which is the last piece), does that form a basis for you to answer your question?


http://www.globalissues.org/article/342/the-usa-patriot-act-was-planned-before-911

whole2th

Blade's arguments boil down to lame attempts to discredit based upon labeling--not in engaging the evidence.

Blade fails miserably to refute the premise of this topic. Envision Blade having apoplectic fits as he writes "anti-Semite" and "h**e".

whole2th

okie don

Can you say " Gulf of Tonkin''.
She false f**g event we were finally told about 50 yrs later!

whole2th

Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry filed two legal actions:

1) 58 page petition to the US Attorney of the Southern District NY court to establish a Grand Jury (April 10, 2018)
2) Lawsuit against FBI/DOJ to compel report to Congress on 7 areas of heretofore hidden proofs of the false f**g aspects of 9-11.

https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org

Bad boys, bad boys
Whatcha gonna do?
Whatcha gonna do
When they come for you?

whole2th

Two short evening sessions of reading will answer your questions. Finding the information for yourself seems far more convincing than my taking your hand to answer questions.

Any number of websites detailing motive, means, opportunity and complicity of the mainstream (f**e news) media in the cover-up can be located by searching the topic title: "Israel did 9/11"

The book can be purchased on Amazon, bollyn.com and here: https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Store.aspx

American Free Press writer Victor Thorn identified 9/11 as "MADE IN ISRAEL" over 14 years ago.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Good grief, no wonder we can't all get along. We're being played by both sides.

Just my take on this. Maybe you can agree that the top of our CIA and FBI were corrupt and tried to do Trump in and remove him from office. Does that mean all Americans are guilty? NO!

We know that the Five Eyes worked with our CIA and FBI to remove Trump. Does that mean all of the intel agents in those countries are evil? No!

The same applies to Israel and the Mossad. Liberman is trying to take down Bibi right now. Who is the white hat and who is the black hat? Liberman is from the Intel side. That's all I know for a fact.

We need to find out who is controlling these "compartmentalized" groups. That's who is behind all the madness and mayhem, death and destruction, drugs and human trafficking.

I think it's the banksters and the Rothschilds, Rockefeller, and Payseur families, etc... Those are the ones at the top of the pyramid playing god with our entire world. Those are the ones we should be after. The rest is a waste of time and are diversions. Those are the ones charging us interest to use our own money and start the wars and finance both sides. As long as we fight one another they will continue to win.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

The premise of this topic is "Israel did 9/11" which is the most outrageous departure from the t***h one can imagine. Al Qaeda is wholly responsible for the attacks, no one outside Osama bin Laden's circle of radical fundamentalists had a damned thing to do with it.

It is laughable that I would have "apoplectic fits" facing the reality of anti-Semitism and hatred of Jews in general. Every source you reference is anti-Semitic or an anti-Israel conspiracy, none of which has ever provided irrefutable evidence that Israel or Jews was the perpetrator of the 9/11 attacks.

Dream on, putz.

whole2th

The official narratives about 9-11 which Blade doggedly regurgitates are big lies.

Let's say Al Qaeda did 9-11. How did Al Qaeda rig Building 7 and the Twin Towers for explosive demolition?

Bold-faced lies about who did 9-11 are staggering. Some participants here at the IDF-operated blog IMAGINE that they have everything to lose--and so they lie.

How hard would it be to give up the idea that goyim must be ens***ed, deceived and even exterminated? Who are the real "Hitlers (TM)" in this exchange who are repeating big lies? (The narratives of Hitler (tm) are not the man, Hitler.)

Fail.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

You really need to read up on WW2 history...What Hitler (your buddy) did to Jews and others he didnt think looked like him...Read up!!.....And stop embarrassing yourself!!!

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

What "official narratives" are you talking about? The 9/11 Commission? NIST? FEMA? Give me a break.

I'm going with science--physics, chemistry, metallurgy, Newton's laws and the laws of thermodynamics, plus 20 years as a professional fire fighter with a working knowledge of explosives and their use in building demolitions. In addition to common sense.

On top of that, I have the statements and analyses of demolition engineers regarding the impossibility of rigging the WTC buildings for controlled demolitions under conditions that existed at the time.

"IDF-operated blog"???? Wow, WTF are you doing here? You're skating on very thin ice if you believe that crap.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

You are right..Waste of time to try to convince someone who doesnt know or who doesnt want to know world History...