Mueller report knowingly published a falsehood?
Jun 16, 2019 16:50:19 #
woodguru wrote:
You still don't pass over information to Russian entities even if it can be found on the internet. The point here is that Trump people were working with Russian misinformation entities to help target their information programs... not frigging okay
Just fine, actually, compared with the plethora of frigging un-okay, corrupt, treasonous antics of Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Jun 16, 2019 17:02:15 #
Kevyn wrote:
The Mueller is redacted to the point that we can only determine what trumps hand picked lackey wants us to believe.
The Mueller report was redacted where it was mandated by law. They could not release grand jury testimony, testimony of on going cases, or information about individuals not charged with a crime. Also, a prosecutor does not find anyone innocent. A prosecutor's job is to determine if charges should be filed in a case. If an indictment is filed, the prosecutor presents evidence of guilt and the defense attorney presents evidence of innocence. It is then for a judge or jury to make the decision of guilt or innocence.
Jun 16, 2019 17:33:10 #
Kickaha wrote:
The Mueller report was redacted where it was manda... (show quote)
Oh, Buddy, you are so wasting your time and effort with that one.
Jun 16, 2019 17:58:47 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Oh, Buddy, you are so wasting your time and effort with that one.
I know that one is hopeless, but maybe it can reach some with an open mind. You never know what can happen when facts are presented, even Van Jones gave Trump credit for the First Step Act.
Jun 16, 2019 18:04:53 #
Kickaha wrote:
Van Jones gave Trump credit for the First Step Act.
Ha! I guarantee he was backed into a corner when he said that. No way would he do that voluntarily, on the merits. No, that had to be coerced out of him.
Jun 17, 2019 00:39:14 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
Kickaha wrote:
The Mueller report was redacted where it was manda... (show quote)
Can you believe there are still people who do not understand this point? Especially since it has been said over and over on the liberal media outlets since before the report was issued.
Jun 17, 2019 00:44:48 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Ha! I guarantee he was backed into a corner when he said that. No way would he do that voluntarily, on the merits. No, that had to be coerced out of him.
It surprised me that he did it without coercion, but he said the First Step Act was going to be good for felons of all races, but especially for black felons, who are incarcerated at rates higher than other races. You don't have to like his positions, but you have to respect his intellectual honesty.
Jun 17, 2019 22:04:22 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Being a 'US asset' doesn't automatically make him a US citizen. The two are mutually exclusive.
I didn't say he was a US citizen.??
Jun 17, 2019 22:04:46 #
Jun 17, 2019 22:15:55 #
debeda wrote:
I didn't say he was a US citizen.??
You said he was portrayed as a Russian agent in part 1 of the report. When in fact he is a US asset. My point is that he could realistically be both, there's nothing says he has to be one or the other.
Jun 17, 2019 22:20:23 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
You said he was portrayed as a Russian agent in part 1 of the report. When in fact he is a US asset. My point is that he could realistically be both, there's nothing says he has to be one or the other.
Yes, a Russian intelligence agent. I should have been clearer I guess
Jun 17, 2019 22:23:22 #
debeda wrote:
Yes, a Russian intelligence agent. I should have been clearer I guess
They're better described as double-agents, working both sides of the fence.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.