One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Muellar has spoken
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
May 29, 2019 11:44:13   #
Airforceone
 
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting president.

Muellar Quote. (IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE TRUMP DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION WE WOULD OF SAID SO)

So Trump supporter does that mean that Trump was 100% exonerated like your Dictator in Chief is telling you.

What Muellar was saying is Congress do your job. I have laid out the evidence (BUT CONGRESS CANNOT DO THERE JOB WHEN THE DICTATOR IN CHEIF IS BLOCKS ALL SUBPOENAS AND REFUSE TO TURN OVER ANY DOCUMENTS)

Reply
May 29, 2019 11:49:54   #
Retired builder
 
Airforceone wrote:
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting president.

Muellar Quote. (IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE TRUMP DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION WE WOULD OF SAID SO)

So Trump supporter does that mean that Trump was 100% exonerated like your Dictator in Chief is telling you.

What Muellar was saying is Congress do your job. I have laid out the evidence (BUT CONGRESS CANNOT DO THERE JOB WHEN THE DICTATOR IN CHEIF IS BLOCKS ALL SUBPOENAS AND REFUSE TO TURN OVER ANY DOCUMENTS)
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is... (show quote)


I'm not sure that it is within your comprehension (or lack of it) but you can't prove a negative.

Reply
May 29, 2019 12:04:31   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Stop reading to!
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in his first public appearance since being appointed to lead the Russia investigation, said it was “not an option” to charge President Trump with a crime, citing Department of Justice policy, but maintained that if they had “confidence” that the president did not commit a crime, they "would have said so.”




Airforceone wrote:
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting president.

Muellar Quote. (IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE TRUMP DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION WE WOULD OF SAID SO)

So Trump supporter does that mean that Trump was 100% exonerated like your Dictator in Chief is telling you.

What Muellar was saying is Congress do your job. I have laid out the evidence (BUT CONGRESS CANNOT DO THERE JOB WHEN THE DICTATOR IN CHEIF IS BLOCKS ALL SUBPOENAS AND REFUSE TO TURN OVER ANY DOCUMENTS)
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2019 12:08:46   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Airforceone wrote:
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting president.

Muellar Quote. (IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE TRUMP DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION WE WOULD OF SAID SO)

So Trump supporter does that mean that Trump was 100% exonerated like your Dictator in Chief is telling you.

What Muellar was saying is Congress do your job. I have laid out the evidence (BUT CONGRESS CANNOT DO THERE JOB WHEN THE DICTATOR IN CHEIF IS BLOCKS ALL SUBPOENAS AND REFUSE TO TURN OVER ANY DOCUMENTS)
As a Justice Department employee the DOJ policy is... (show quote)



The h**eful Democrat party is jumping off a very high bridge, the fall will k**l them but it matters not.
Your actions will make it so Americans will shun your party and you will gain zip.

Reply
May 29, 2019 12:13:24   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
H**e because Clinton lost and they still can't live with, now to watch and listen the spin that will fill the air.





MR Mister wrote:
The h**eful Democrat party is jumping off a very high bridge, the fall will k**l them but it matters not.
Your actions will make it so Americans will shun your party and you will gain zip.

Reply
May 29, 2019 12:16:29   #
moldyoldy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8-7c7WcsyU

Reply
May 29, 2019 12:17:45   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Russian-mislead halfrigerm zealots would rather disown their families than admit the toddler-in-charge welcomed Russian help and benefitted by it.

Why?

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2019 12:17:46   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Russian-mislead halfrigerm zealots would rather disown their families than admit the toddler-in-charge welcomed Russian help and benefitted by it.

Why?

Reply
May 29, 2019 12:29:53   #
moldyoldy
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Russian-mislead halfrigerm zealots would rather disown their families than admit the toddler-in-charge welcomed Russian help and benefitted by it.

Why?



Reply
May 29, 2019 12:41:17   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Russian-mislead halfrigerm zealots would rather disown their families than admit the toddler-in-charge welcomed Russian help and benefitted by it.

Why?



Reply
May 29, 2019 12:48:00   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Spin it, that is all you have.



moldyoldy wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8-7c7WcsyU

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2019 13:32:19   #
moldyoldy
 
bmac32 wrote:
Spin it, that is all you have.


His own words are spin?

Reply
May 29, 2019 13:54:52   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
What can't you understand, not an option.



moldyoldy wrote:
His own words are spin?

Reply
May 29, 2019 14:11:50   #
moldyoldy
 
bmac32 wrote:
What can't you understand, not an option.


Not an option for DOJ, only congressional impeachment will allow prosecution.

Reply
May 29, 2019 14:20:59   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Go ahead, it won't go anywhere.



moldyoldy wrote:
Not an option for DOJ, only congressional impeachment will allow prosecution.

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.