The man who knows.
May 28, 2019 13:23:25 #
[quote=Larry the Legend]Oh, goody! More ad hominem attacks! Suspect away there, Goober! I might reveal my suspicions of you but your tolerance for t***h has been revealed as very low so I'll forego the temptation and occupy the high ground once again. Feel free to throw a childish tantrum and kick and scream as you read this. Actually, if you could make a video and post it we'd all be really happy to laugh at your self-inflicted childishness.[/quote
I have to admit, I was a bit dumbfounded by your attack. It didn't seem to be based in anything other than a rant in lunacy. First, you called me a liar. Then you insinuated that PR put me in my place. I attempted to figure out what PR had commented that you thought so profoundly chastized me. It was but a sentence or two where she implored me to knock it off.
Then you went on from there, something about me suggesting that lies needn't be told. Then you ranted that I didn't back up that comment. Perhaps I assume too much, but anyone who has followed my posts probably knows my position on that subject.
Moving on: you babbled at length that you take the time to analysis this or that before posting. Obviously, you didn't take enough time to analyze before posting that you expose liers from a position of t***h, Your position of t***h seems a bit faulty, for I'm not a lier.
And my tolerance for t***h? Are we to conclude that you're the arbiter of t***h? Perhaps in your delusional mind. By the way, you're the one who asked if I was questioning your manliness. That you didn't like the answer, doesn't make it an ad hominem attack. Perhaps the t***h distressed you into thinking it ad hominem.
I have to admit, I was a bit dumbfounded by your attack. It didn't seem to be based in anything other than a rant in lunacy. First, you called me a liar. Then you insinuated that PR put me in my place. I attempted to figure out what PR had commented that you thought so profoundly chastized me. It was but a sentence or two where she implored me to knock it off.
Then you went on from there, something about me suggesting that lies needn't be told. Then you ranted that I didn't back up that comment. Perhaps I assume too much, but anyone who has followed my posts probably knows my position on that subject.
Moving on: you babbled at length that you take the time to analysis this or that before posting. Obviously, you didn't take enough time to analyze before posting that you expose liers from a position of t***h, Your position of t***h seems a bit faulty, for I'm not a lier.
And my tolerance for t***h? Are we to conclude that you're the arbiter of t***h? Perhaps in your delusional mind. By the way, you're the one who asked if I was questioning your manliness. That you didn't like the answer, doesn't make it an ad hominem attack. Perhaps the t***h distressed you into thinking it ad hominem.
May 28, 2019 14:08:44 #
[quote=Richard Rowland][quote=Larry the Legend]Oh, goody! More ad hominem attacks! Suspect away there, Goober! I might reveal my suspicions of you but your tolerance for t***h has been revealed as very low so I'll forego the temptation and occupy the high ground once again. Feel free to throw a childish tantrum and kick and scream as you read this. Actually, if you could make a video and post it we'd all be really happy to laugh at your self-inflicted childishness.[/quote
I have to admit, I was a bit dumbfounded by your attack. It didn't seem to be based in anything other than a rant in lunacy. First, you called me a liar. Then you insinuated that PR put me in my place. I attempted to figure out what PR had commented that you thought so profoundly chastized me. It was but a sentence or two where she implored me to knock it off.
Then you went on from there, something about me suggesting that lies needn't be told. Then you ranted that I didn't back up that comment. Perhaps I assume too much, but anyone who has followed my posts probably knows my position on that subject.
Moving on: you babbled at length that you take the time to analysis this or that before posting. Obviously, you didn't take enough time to analyze before posting that you expose liers from a position of t***h, Your position of t***h seems a bit faulty, for I'm not a lier.
And my tolerance for t***h? Are we to conclude that you're the arbiter of t***h? Perhaps in your delusional mind. By the way, you're the one who asked if I was questioning your manliness. That you didn't like the answer, doesn't make it an ad hominem attack. Perhaps the t***h distressed you into thinking it ad hominem.[/quote]
Good. Now go back and read over the several entries chronicling our interaction and compare it to what you just wrote. Match point, right there...
Bye.
I have to admit, I was a bit dumbfounded by your attack. It didn't seem to be based in anything other than a rant in lunacy. First, you called me a liar. Then you insinuated that PR put me in my place. I attempted to figure out what PR had commented that you thought so profoundly chastized me. It was but a sentence or two where she implored me to knock it off.
Then you went on from there, something about me suggesting that lies needn't be told. Then you ranted that I didn't back up that comment. Perhaps I assume too much, but anyone who has followed my posts probably knows my position on that subject.
Moving on: you babbled at length that you take the time to analysis this or that before posting. Obviously, you didn't take enough time to analyze before posting that you expose liers from a position of t***h, Your position of t***h seems a bit faulty, for I'm not a lier.
And my tolerance for t***h? Are we to conclude that you're the arbiter of t***h? Perhaps in your delusional mind. By the way, you're the one who asked if I was questioning your manliness. That you didn't like the answer, doesn't make it an ad hominem attack. Perhaps the t***h distressed you into thinking it ad hominem.[/quote]
Good. Now go back and read over the several entries chronicling our interaction and compare it to what you just wrote. Match point, right there...
Bye.
May 28, 2019 14:26:25 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Good. Now go back and read over the several entries chronicling our interaction and compare it to what you just wrote. Match point, right there...
Bye.
Bye.
In your mind only, it's Matchpoint!
May 28, 2019 17:18:39 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
In your mind only, it's Matchpoint!
Mine, certainly, and anyone else who happens to have been following this little interaction. You see, I'm not the only sane one around, there are many of us and we enjoy spectating each others' little interactions. You been 'outed'!
May 28, 2019 18:59:57 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Mine, certainly, and anyone else who happens to have been following this little interaction. You see, I'm not the only sane one around, there are many of us and we enjoy spectating each others' little interactions. You been 'outed'!
I think some on here would question if you're sane. "We enjoy spectating each other's little interactions". So that's it! You think you're putting on a show. Were all supposed to be enthralled with your brilliant performance.
You're defiantly deranged. Pompous, and obnoxious, is your show. By all means, carry on, for you're your own biggest fan.
May 28, 2019 19:09:01 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
You're defiantly deranged. Pompous, and obnoxious, is your show. By all means, carry on, for you're your own biggest fan.
I graciously accept your surrender, ignominious though it is. Remember now, it was your own lie that got this whole charade under way to begin with.
May 28, 2019 20:36:52 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
I graciously accept your surrender, ignominious though it is. Remember now, it was your own lie that got this whole charade under way to begin with.
Did I say anything about surrender? By the way, will you remind me again of what I'm supposed to have lied about, from your faulty position of t***h? Then I'll discontinue this comedy and allow you the fantasy that I've surrendered.
I have to ask though, what makes you think anyone else is interested in what you or I have t say to one another? Could it just be more of your delusional mindset?
May 28, 2019 21:16:56 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
You're defiantly deranged. Pompous, and obnoxious, is your show. By all means, carry on, for you're your own biggest fan.
See that? That's you, doing the only thing you have left, calling names. Apparently I'm "pompous and obnoxious". Then you accuse me of narcissism, but you don't know the word for it so you tell me I'm my "own biggest fan".
Hear that? That's the sound of me laughing my ass off. Now please, just go away, hm?
May 28, 2019 21:28:11 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
See that? That's you, doing the only thing you have left, calling names. Apparently I'm "pompous and obnoxious". Then you accuse me of narcissism, but you don't know the word for it so you tell me I'm my "own biggest fan".
Hear that? That's the sound of me laughing my ass off. Now please, just go away, hm?
Hear that? That's the sound of me laughing my ass off. Now please, just go away, hm?
You didn't answer my question. Oh, I know the meaning of narcissism, however, a true narcissist usually possesses more to be narcissistic about than you possess. Now go play with your cat.
May 28, 2019 21:30:19 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
You didn't answer my question. Oh, I know the meaning of narcissism, however, a true narcissist usually possesses more to be narcissistic about than you possess. Now go play with your cat.
Wh**ever gave you the idea that I own a cat? Is this another of your fantasies? You really do need to learn to control your impulses better you know.
May 28, 2019 21:33:07 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Wh**ever gave you the idea that I own a cat? Is this another of your fantasies? You really do need to learn to control your impulses better you know.
Perhaps I'm telepathic. Now, tell me you don't own a cat.
May 28, 2019 21:45:13 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
Perhaps I'm telepathic. Now, tell me you don't own a cat.
Okay, I don't own a cat. I have only ever ever owned one cat, years ago, and he was more my wife's than mine. I like cats but have no use for them so I let the girls coddle the cats and concentrate on more useful applications for my time and resources. Funny really, because cats always seem to gravitate towards me after a few minutes of getting used to my presence. Same with dogs, that I also do not own, although I have also had a dog in the past, but not at the same time as the cat. Anything else you'd like to know?
May 28, 2019 21:50:33 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Okay, I don't own a cat. I have only ever ever ow... (show quote)
Tell me about the girls.
May 28, 2019 21:54:42 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
Tell me about the girls.
Girls? What girls?
May 28, 2019 22:26:47 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Girls? What girls?
You indicate you let the girls coddle the cats, I'm assuming you have daughters. I'm merely interested in hearing a father's comments and praise.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.