One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Georgia Governor Regretting A******n Bill As Movie Industry Pulls Out Of Georgia
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
May 25, 2019 12:43:43   #
kemmer
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
No one is forcing u to have a child! Get neutered!

Loons who are against a******n AND contraception are strange.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:04:01   #
Carlos
 
There will be others moving in. Whenever there's a vacuum it's usually filled with something better. Got to stay the course, give in on this and it will show them to do it again with something else. Movie industry
Is foul and dirty-minded anyway, a sewer for kids to fall into. The only movies that are decent are the ones Clint Eastwood makes and a few others. The rest is are usually filthy minded left-wing losers. Let's face
It, those are the types that go along with k*****g babies, born or unborn, who needs them. Like Target stores selling kinky sex clothes to third graders, them and their open house bathrooms. Already complaint of rape
And disease ridden bathrooms. A real sex selling store .
Don't worry about the dirty movie industry moving out, their doing you a favor. Less crap for the kids to see. Like I said, something will make up the difference.
Hurray for good old Georgia.
.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:09:08   #
woodguru
 
I love seeing these states recklessly jump toward these bills, it is going to hurt every state that does it.

The real number of the American People who want Roe v Wade left alone is at least 70%. 30% anti a******n people is not sustainable and will spell the destruction of the Republican party.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 13:13:01   #
kemmer
 
woodguru wrote:
I love seeing these states recklessly jump toward these bills, it is going to hurt every state that does it.

The real number of the American People who want Roe v Wade left alone is at least 70%. 30% anti a******n people is not sustainable and will spell the destruction of the Republican party.


Reply
May 25, 2019 13:14:32   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
peg w wrote:
I has anyone seen Call The Midwife lately? It has told a few stories about the bad old days before a******n was legal. It was not pretty. One of the hospitsls in Chicago had a ward full of women victums of boched a******ns. They treated five thousand a year. We now have 2 pills that can end a pregnancy before 11 weeks, so I doubt we will have the disastrous conquences of yore, but you never know.
I resent people forcing their religious beleives on me, too.


Excuse me, peg w, it not religious at all. Tell me where in the Bible it says not to have an a******n?
It's about civil rights. Since you are pro-a******n, I'm sure that you are also burned crispy that children do not go to jail with their parents who are in the country illegally and are repeat offenders, that you believe they should have civil rights, but on the other hand you believe it's OK to k**l a baby with a heart beat that it has been proven can recognize it's mother's voice and language, can feel pain, and will try to get away from pain.
I would post pictures here but I don't want to lose my account. So, I'll say this, if you REALLY believe it's OK to abort a baby with a heartbeat, then just search for aborted babies and click on Images. If you are unmoved by these photos, then there is no hope for you. Some of the babies shown are literally torn to pieces, and if you don't already know it I'll tell you...THEY FEEL IT...THEY FEEL BEING TORN LIMB FROM LIMB...HEAD PULLED OFF. If the images are too horrible to look at, then the act is too horrible to commit.
Look at the photos and tell me what you think.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:17:16   #
woodguru
 
Carlos wrote:

Is foul and dirty-minded anyway, a sewer for kids to fall into. The only movies that are decent are the ones Clint Eastwood makes and a few others. The rest is are usually filthy minded left-wing losers.


You don't see the hypocrisy?

Trump, the foulest mouthed president we have ever had, the most openly nasty minded toward women we have ever had to look at...and you use words like that? Roy Moore, a p*******e, a true pig... it's part of being a republican and the party including evangelicals has lost their moral values, christian and otherwise.

A president that resorts to openly berating women on their looks, is one of the ugliest human beings we have ever had to suffer through. And there is something wrong with the values of people who support that filthy minded pig.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:26:55   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 


Really? Please read the whole post.

Here's a CNN paragraph;
Overlooked in the CPAC shuffle of late last week were the results of a nationwide CNN survey on a******n, the results of which confirm America's anti-a******n trend. A solid majority (58 percent) of respondents espoused viewpoints associated with the pro-life movement; namely, that a******n should be legal under "few" or "no" circumstances. The 'mostly illegal' position represented a strong plurality at 38 percent. Meanwhile, just 40 percent of Americans said that the practice should be "always" or "mostly" legal. Also, public financing of a******n remains heavily unpopular:

Here's another from The Washington Times;
A hefty majority of Americans - including a majority of those who consider themselves pro-choice - support “substantial a******n restrictions”, says a new Marist Poll commissioned by the Knights of Columbus and released Tuesday.

The survey found that 81 percent of Americans and 66 percent of those who identify as pro-choice would restrict a******n to - at most - the first three months of pregnancy. Eighty two percent of women agree with that. The pollster says these findings have been consistent for the last eight years.

In addition, 55 percent of American overall agree that “a******n ultimately does a woman more harm than good”; 56 percent of women and 27 percent of pro-choice advocates agree. Six in 10 Americans - including 61 percent of women - say a******n is “morally wrong.” One-third of pro-choice Americans agree.

Another 77 percent overall - including 79 percent of women and 71 percent of pro-choice supporters - say that laws can protect both a mother and her unborn child. Seventeen percent of Americans overall, 15 percent of women, 23 percent of pro-choice identifiers disagree.

For once, I believe a CNN report. LOL

And this from Life News;

As Roe v. Wade turns 43 this week and Americans mark more than four decades of unlimited a******ns, new polling data shows they want a change in the direction of protecting unborn children.

A new national poll shows a strong majority of Americans — including a majority of those who consider themselves “pro-choice” on a******n — support substantial a******n limits. That’s according to a new national survey of 1,686 adults conducted at the end of November by the Marist Institute for Public Opinion at Marist University.

Here’s a list of the findings:

The survey found that more than 8 in 10 Americans (81 percent), including women (82 percent) and nearly two-thirds of pro-choice supporters (66 percent), would restrict a******n to — at most — the first three months of pregnancy. The answer to this question has been approximately 8 in 10 since the survey was launched in 2008.

Additionally, 77 percent of Americans, including 79 percent of women and 71 percent of “pro-choice” supporters, say that laws can protect both a mother and her unborn child. Only about 1 in 5 (17 percent of Americans, 15 percent of women, 23 percent of pro-choice identifiers) disagree.

The poll also found majorities of Americans see a******n as both ultimately harmful to women and morally wrong.

By a 25-point margin, Americans (55 to 30 percent) say that a******n ultimately does a woman more harm than good. A similar proportion of women agree (56 percent to 31 percent). More than 1 in 4 who identify as pro-choice (27 percent) also share this view.

Six in 10 Americans (60 percent), including 61 percent of women, say a******n is “morally wrong.” One-third of pro-choice Americans agree (33 percent).

In addition, nearly 7 in 10 Americans (68 percent), including 69 percent of women, oppose taxpayer funding of a******n. This includes 51 percent of those who consider themselves pro-choice. Fewer than 3 in 10 Americans (29 percent) support it.

Similarly, more than 6 in 10 Americans (61 percent), including 60 percent of women, support laws that would ban a******n after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except to save the life of the mother. The percentage was the same for pro-choice supporters (62 percent).

Fifty-one percent of Americans — including 50 percent of women — believe health care providers and organizations should have the right to opt out of providing a******n services if they have moral objections. About 4 in 10 (42 percent) of both groups disagree. Notably, even one-third (34 percent) of those who identify as pro-choice would protect the right to opt out.

And one more from Townhall;
As we've seen in numerous polls over the last two years, opposition to a******n isn't merely a "mainstream" American position. It's a majority one. Gallup's new national survey on the question is packed with fascinating data. Especially interesting is the break-down of public opinion split among four options: A******n should be always legal, legal in "most" circumstances, legal "only in a few" circumstances, or never legal. The former two viewpoints represent the traditional "pro-choice" stance. The latter two are where the "pro-life" movement plants its policy f**g. A few highlights from the findings:

(1) On the nominal "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" question, pro-lifers narrowly outnumber the other side, 48-45.

(2) Fully 58 percent of adults say a******n should be illegal in all circumstances, or only permitted in "a few." Just 39 percent say the practice should be legal in "all" or "most" circumstances.

(3) On that same question, 57 percent of women adopt a pro-life view; 40 percent adopt the more doctrinaire "pro-choice" position, which is supposed to be the official stance of their entire g****r.

(4) Millenials (aged 18-34) are the most likely group to believe a******n should be outlawed in all circumstances. Overall, 57 percent of these young v**ers select one of the pro-life options.

(5) By partisan break-down, 59 percent of independents oppose a******n in all or most cases, as do 43 percent of Democrats. The pro-life positions are adopted by 78 percent of Republicans.

(6) Seventy-four percent of the public is paying little or no attention to the trial of late-term a******nist and accused serial k**ler Kermit Gosnell. A paltry 25 percent are paying "very" or "somewhat" close attention.

(7) Pluralities believe the media isn't giving the Gosnell case sufficient coverage, though a majority admits it doesn't know enough to say either way. Kermit Gosnell is still an unknown among most of the populace. One wonders how people's a******n views might shift if they were made aware of the horrors that took place at his Philadelphia clinic.

To me, this is pretty strong evidence that Americans DO support this crap.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 14:25:59   #
Carol Kelly
 


WRONG!!!

Reply
May 25, 2019 15:10:34   #
kemmer
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
WRONG!!!

Right. 70% of Americans want Roe v Wade left alone.

Reply
May 25, 2019 16:25:35   #
Rose42
 
kemmer wrote:
Right. 70% of Americans want Roe v Wade left alone.


That was just shown to be false.

Reply
May 25, 2019 17:08:24   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
kemmer wrote:
Loons who are against a******n AND contraception are strange.


What is your opinion of males who will put their junk in something they wouldn't want to step in...natural contraception?

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 17:24:29   #
kemmer
 
byronglimish wrote:
What is your opinion of males who will put their junk in something they wouldn't want to step in...natural contraception?

If some males would keep their junk out of places they don’t belong, we wouldn’t be arguing about those insane new a******n laws.

Reply
May 25, 2019 17:40:11   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
kemmer wrote:
If some males would keep their junk out of places they don’t belong, we wouldn’t be arguing about those insane new a******n laws.


So it's now "insanity" to save a baby from being murdered?

Reply
May 25, 2019 17:53:32   #
kemmer
 
byronglimish wrote:
So it's now "insanity" to save a baby from being murdered?

Someone needs to explain to you the difference between a baby and a non-viable fetus.

Reply
May 25, 2019 18:03:58   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
kemmer wrote:
Someone needs to explain to you the difference between a baby and a non-viable fetus.


Insanity is trying to justify murdering a fetus..period!

So the next drunk person who gets behind the wheel and terminates an expecting moms fetus, that person should not be held accountable?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.