What Part Of "Congress Can Investigate Anything It Wants To" Doesn't Trump And Barr Get? (Page 3): the Mueller report was not an article, so you are basing your view on an article ?

herbie

JFlorio wrote:

I really try to limit the amount of time I spend talking to ignorant people, such as you. So consider the article and do some actual research.

the Mueller report was not an article, so you are basing your view on an article ? yes you are very ignorant and i am done talking with you until you actually know what you are talking about read the report

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

herbie wrote:

you just forgot how to read

Here ya go, herbie. Some reading for you. Get back to us when you are finished. We are waiting with bated breath to hear your take on all of this.

Mueller Report: Vol I and II
WHSC Memo
28 CFR Part 600: Special Counsel GP
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 73— OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

herbie wrote:

the Mueller report was not an article, so you are basing your view on an article ? yes you are very ignorant and i am done talking with you until you actually know what you are talking about read the report

You're a joke. The man you all worshiped to get Trump; Mueller, found no collusion, crime , or misdemeanor. Even though 17 of his 19 investigators were Clinton supporters. They could not find evidence to indict him. Not my report. The Special councils Report. You just can't except it because of your hatred for Trump. If he'd have found provable criminal actions by the President I'd be all for his removal. I don't believe anyone should be above the Law. I also don't believe your I.Q.'s much above 60.

herbie

JFlorio wrote:

You're a joke. The man you all worshiped to get Tr... (show quote)

actually your the joke, ok so no collusion but at least 10 counts of obstruction. But you will say that is ok right ? I think you be the one with the questionable IQ. have a nice day

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

herbie wrote:

actually your the joke, ok so no collusion but at least 10 counts of obstruction. But you will say that is ok right ? I think you be the one with the questionable IQ. have a nice day

Mueller never issued a single indictment for obstruction of justice. No indictment, no prosecution, no prosecution, no conviction.

Might want to consider why Mueller is refusing to testify before the House committee.

Ricktloml

Blade_Runner wrote:

Mueller never issued a single indictment for obstruction of justice. No indictment, no prosecution, no prosecution, no conviction.

Might want to consider why Mueller is refusing to testify before the House committee.

Could it be that he doesn't want to explain why he knew at least a year and a half, (if not immediately when he was appointed,) that there was NO Trump/Russian collusion, coordination, or conspiracy. Yet he spent upwards of 34 million tax-payer dollars to entrap, bankrupt, a jail private American citizens for rank political purposes.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

herbie wrote:

actually your the joke, ok so no collusion but at least 10 counts of obstruction. But you will say that is ok right ? I think you be the one with the questionable IQ. have a nice day

So what you are saying is that Mueller, the man you all said is above reproach is ignoring 10 counts of obstruction that he uncovered? Does that even make sense?

herbie

JFlorio wrote:

So what you are saying is that Mueller, the man you all said is above reproach is ignoring 10 counts of obstruction that he uncovered? Does that even make sense?

in his report he stated can`t prosecute a sitting president, and that is what makes no sense to me. so if he was not the president yes he would be prosecuted

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Ricktloml wrote:

Could it be that he doesn't want to explain why he knew at least a year and a half, (if not immediately when he was appointed,) that there was NO Trump/Russian collusion, coordination, or conspiracy. Yet he spent upwards of 34 million tax-payer dollars to entrap, bankrupt, a jail private American citizens for rank political purposes.

Bottom line, Rick, is Mueller doesn't want to perjure himself.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

herbie wrote:

in his report he stated can`t prosecute a sitting president, and that is what makes no sense to me. so if he was not the president yes he would be prosecuted

https://www.justsecurity.org/63857/barr-to-senate-president-is-not-immune-from-prosecutor-declaration-of-indictable-offense/

herbie

JFlorio wrote:

https://www.justsecurity.org/63857/barr-to-senate-president-is-not-immune-from-prosecutor-declaration-of-indictable-offense/

well we will see how this plays out since the president is ignoring subpoenas and telling staff to lie

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

herbie wrote:

well we will see how this plays out since the president is ignoring subpoenas and telling staff to lie

This telling staff to lie is not provable. It’s a he said he said at best, or just plain hearsay.

herbie

JFlorio wrote:

This telling staff to lie is not provable. It’s a he said he said at best, or just plain hearsay.

but it is something everyone knows to be a fact, but of course you will deny it because you worship him. have a nice day now

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

herbie wrote:

but it is something everyone knows to be a fact, but of course you will deny it because you worship him. have a nice day now

Worship Trump? No way do I worship any politician. I like his policies h**e his mannerisms. It is not a fact. I have heard plenty in office say he didn’t tell anyone to lie. Unless there is corroborating witnesses or a recording its hearsay.