Barr's Fox News interview drives critics nuts (Page 2): woody, So apparently you don't think what the FBI did wrong should be exposed & corrected?

F.D.R.

woodguru wrote:

It drives people nuts because the AG is supposed to be apolitical, which Barr is obviously anything but. Barr is supposed to represent the FBI, and look for what was done right, not what they they did wrong so as to undermine the Mueller report.

I don't think Barr is paying any attention to the evidence any prosecutor could use to make a case against Trump for obstruction except to hide it.

woody, So apparently you don't think what the FBI did wrong should be exposed & corrected?

kemmer

eagleye13 wrote:

Ingraham: Barr's Fox News interview drives critics nuts
https://youtu.be/ezfMx43DAxo

Are the liberal network talking heads; losing their heads?
It sure seems so.

Barr is an unapologetic Trump protector. In his job application to Trump, he in effect said he believes in an imperial presidency where the president can do no wrong, so naturally Trump hired him on the spot. Now that Barr has hit the big time, he's doing nothing more than jerking Trump off.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

woodguru wrote:

It drives people nuts because the AG is supposed to be apolitical, which Barr is obviously anything but.

Mmm-hmm. Obviously. Except to me. I must be totally blind because I don't see what's right in front of my eyes.

woodguru wrote:

Barr is supposed to represent the FBI, and look for what was done right

Yes, learn from your successes, as well as your failures. but especially the failures...

woodguru wrote:

not what they they did wrong so as to undermine the Mueller report.

So by identifying where they went wrong he is enacting a political agenda to undermine the Mueller report? Is there no possibility that they simply acted in bad faith and he's rectifying that crime 'misstep'?

woodguru wrote:

I don't think Barr is paying any attention to the evidence any prosecutor could use to make a case against Trump for obstruction except to hide it.

Absolutely right! Take him and Mueller to the penitential woodshed and make them pay for not finding incriminating evidence against a man who has committed no crime but you so badly wish he had. Clearly they're hiding something and should be tortured incessantly until they crack and spill their guts for the world to see.

I have another idea. I know it might seem radical and you won't like it, because it's the right thing to do, so maybe you should take a half-dozen steps back and consider where you're being led. I know this is a brand new concept, but just stop and think for a minute. Oh, never mind...

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

kemmer wrote:

Barr is an unapologetic Trump protector. In his job application to Trump, he in effect said he believes in an imperial presidency where the president can do no wrong, so naturally Trump hired him on the spot. Now that Barr has hit the big time, he's doing nothing more than jerking Trump off.

Exactly like Holder did for the halfrican, eh kemmie?

kemmer

Jakebrake wrote:

Exactly like Holder did for the halfrican, eh kemmie?

The difference being Trump hired Barr exclusively as a personal, private protector.

federally indicted mattoid

Jakebrake wrote:

Exactly like Holder did for the halfrican, eh kemmie?

Yay jakie! You were an inspiration for another new name for the pumpkin in the Whitehouse:

Halfrigerm.

Fits, sad.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Yay jakie! You were an inspiration for another new name for the pumpkin in the Whitehouse:

Halfrigerm.

Fits, sad.

Lame lil feller, lame~

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

kemmer wrote:

The difference being Trump hired Barr exclusively as a personal, private protector.

Good for him, and it once again proves Trump is running circles around the dimocrat buffoons infesting DC~

archie bunker Loc: Texas

kemmer wrote:

The difference being Trump hired Barr exclusively as a personal, private protector.

Wow! So, Trump tells you what his motivations are?
Or, do you get this kind of information from your weegee board?

waltmoreno

woodguru wrote:

It drives people nuts because the AG is supposed to be apolitical, which Barr is obviously anything but. Barr is supposed to represent the FBI, and look for what was done right, not what they they did wrong so as to undermine the Mueller report.

I don't think Barr is paying any attention to the evidence any prosecutor could use to make a case against Trump for obstruction except to hide it.

Paybacks are a b***h, woodie! AG Barr is doing exactly what any competent AG would do. Following the overwhelming evidence to wherever it leads, no matter who it leads to. And many of the deep state dems are squirming cuz they know they're guilty.
Whereas prosecutors before Barr ignored mountains of, in-your-face evidence strongly suggesting a c**p against Trump, and focused on microscopic, tangential gossamers as long as they were against Trump.
Barr is exactly what's needed to restore our confidence in our intelligence community. He knows it can't happen unless there are consequences for breaking the law. And long prison sentences for violators.

woodguru

eagleye13 wrote:

Let the squirming continue!
Even Pr********n H wont help.

Meanwhile pull your head out and start paying attention to the things that are in the report, as well as the obstruction Trump is continually doing in our faces.

Wonttakeitanymore

woodguru wrote:

It drives people nuts because the AG is supposed to be apolitical, which Barr is obviously anything but. Barr is supposed to represent the FBI, and look for what was done right, not what they they did wrong so as to undermine the Mueller report.

I don't think Barr is paying any attention to the evidence any prosecutor could use to make a case against Trump for obstruction except to hide it.

YOu mean like Obama’s ag?

Wonttakeitanymore

working class stiff wrote:

I have no issue with the investigation, because like you I would also like to know what was going on. However, when the President tweets about treason, he is acting as judge and jury before any evidence was presented or the investigation completed. Puts the cart before the horse, don't you think?

Hes just actin like the demonrats! How does it feel?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

woodguru wrote:

It drives people nuts because the AG is supposed to be apolitical, which Barr is obviously anything but. Barr is supposed to represent the FBI, and look for what was done right, not what they they did wrong so as to undermine the Mueller report.

I don't think Barr is paying any attention to the evidence any prosecutor could use to make a case against Trump for obstruction except to hide it.

"Barr is supposed to represent the FBI"???

This is really weird, man. Dozens of times on this forum, members have provided you with sufficient information on the structure of the Executive Branch, including direct access to the Executive Branch and the DOJ website, operation manuals and flow charts, yet you still don't get it.

The FBI is just one of many agencies within the DOJ, and the Attorney General is their immediate boss, he doesn't "represent" the FBI, through the agency director, the AG runs it.

Your refusal to comprehend and embrace our American system of government speaks volumes about your status as a loyal American citizen. In a word you are a disgrace.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

Meanwhile pull your head out and start paying attention to the things that are in the report, as well as the obstruction Trump is continually doing in our faces.

Name the individual instances of obstruction that are not covered by precedents set before him.