Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
They don't investigate themselves. Biden told them he knew nothing of about his son's dealing's so that was good enough for them.
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
McConnell has no backbone nor do the rest of the Senate RINOS
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
And the dumb-dumbs continue to support him anyways....
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
Because when you stand them on their heads they all look the same. Why do you think they make their self null and void to the laws they pass upon us. Social Security, nope, full pay for the rest of their life. 'Affordable' Care Act, no way that's only for the peons. Sexual harassment laws, you want to see the whole government behind bars? Don't answer that. Insider trading, if this law applied to them they would be limited to stealing only half of what they steal now.
You will find more criminals in the Halls of Congress than a Federal Prison. Can anyone show me a congressman that isn't living above his pay? That hag Waters lives in a $4.5 million house and v**ed the most corrupt in Congress more than once but thanks to stupid she continues her corruption and her district still the worst in the country. Freedom isn't free and soon the whole nation will have a rude awaking of that.
badbob85037 wrote:
Because when you stand them on their heads they all look the same. Why do you think they make their self null and void to the laws they pass upon us. Social Security, nope, full pay for the rest of their life. 'Affordable' Care Act, no way that's only for the peons. Sexual harassment laws, you want to see the whole government behind bars? Don't answer that. Insider trading, if this law applied to them they would be limited to stealing only half of what they steal now.
You will find more criminals in the Halls of Congress than a Federal Prison. Can anyone show me a congressman that isn't living above his pay? That hag Waters lives in a $4.5 million house and v**ed the most corrupt in Congress more than once but thanks to stupid she continues her corruption and her district still the worst in the country. Freedom isn't free and soon the whole nation will have a rude awaking of that.
Because when you stand them on their heads they al... (
show quote)
Man, ya got that right!!!
Q. How do 'Public Servants' become millionaires?
Hmmmmm
badbob85037 wrote:
Because when you stand them on their heads they all look the same. Why do you think they make their self null and void to the laws they pass upon us. Social Security, nope, full pay for the rest of their life. 'Affordable' Care Act, no way that's only for the peons. Sexual harassment laws, you want to see the whole government behind bars? Don't answer that. Insider trading, if this law applied to them they would be limited to stealing only half of what they steal now.
You will find more criminals in the Halls of Congress than a Federal Prison. Can anyone show me a congressman that isn't living above his pay? That hag Waters lives in a $4.5 million house and v**ed the most corrupt in Congress more than once but thanks to stupid she continues her corruption and her district still the worst in the country. Freedom isn't free and soon the whole nation will have a rude awaking of that.
Because when you stand them on their heads they al... (
show quote)
Bravo! You really nailed it by bringing this article to our attention. God Bless you.
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
Thank you. Watch your back, please.
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
Once America had what we called " Equal Justice Under the Law" But the Democrats did away with it, Teddy Kennedy remember him? Drunk, runs his car off a bridge and gets out, but leaves a young lady 24 years old to die. She took 8 hours to suffocate, Teddy goes home and to bed. Calls the police the next day. His punishment was "Leaving the scene of an accident. "
A judges son, drunk crashes his car on the Long Island Expressway k*****g 4 people in another car, he is alright. His father the judge calls a meeting with 4 other judges and they find the kid NOT GUILTY.
I can post lots more of this. But You should see that there are lots of people that are above the law. Most are in the Government where the law is made. We as v**ers are not very good at choosing our leaders.
MR Mister wrote:
Once America had what we called " Equal Justice Under the Law" But the Democrats did away with it, Teddy Kennedy remember him? Drunk, runs his car off a bridge and gets out, but leaves a young lady 24 years old to die. She took 8 hours to suffocate, Teddy goes home and to bed. Calls the police the next day. His punishment was "Leaving the scene of an accident. "
A judges son, drunk crashes his car on the Long Island Expressway k*****g 4 people in another car, he is alright. His father the judge calls a meeting with 4 other judges and they find the kid NOT GUILTY.
I can post lots more of this. But You should see that there are lots of people that are above the law. Most are in the Government where the law is made. We as v**ers are not very good at choosing our leaders.
Once America had what we called " Equal Justi... (
show quote)
True, and one of the reasons, I think, is that many are totally oblivious. It takes vigilance to keep our rights, but many have grown weary, and as long as they get the free stuff, which some one else has to pay for, make no mistake, and it does not effect them much personally, they cannot be bothered. Give them their football, their card playing and casinos, bar hopping, and general leisure where they do not have to think or take in any real issues, and they will continue to v**e for the guy who guarantees that. They figure it is not their problem, and some one else will take care of it. And so, politicians, seeing this, go about c***ting, lying, breaking laws they make with impunity, and the beat goes on......until one day, we wake to discover our freedoms are no longer there, the government has taken wh**ever funds we have and re distributed them, and we ask "How did this happen?" Pay attention to history, and you pretty much know where this country is headed and why and how we got so low so fast. I suspect it is too late to turn it around. Too bad. The corruption is so wide spread, from local municipalities to the Feds.
YES, they are all corrupt, along with most Republicans. How is it almost all of them are rich???? Either while they are in Congress or when they get out and use their connections to enrich themselves.
DRAIN THER SWAMP!!!
jwrevagent wrote:
True, and one of the reasons, I think, is that many are totally oblivious. It takes vigilance to keep our rights, but many have grown weary, and as long as they get the free stuff, which some one else has to pay for, make no mistake, and it does not effect them much personally, they cannot be bothered. Give them their football, their card playing and casinos, bar hopping, and general leisure where they do not have to think or take in any real issues, and they will continue to v**e for the guy who guarantees that. They figure it is not their problem, and some one else will take care of it. And so, politicians, seeing this, go about c***ting, lying, breaking laws they make with impunity, and the beat goes on......until one day, we wake to discover our freedoms are no longer there, the government has taken wh**ever funds we have and re distributed them, and we ask "How did this happen?" Pay attention to history, and you pretty much know where this country is headed and why and how we got so low so fast. I suspect it is too late to turn it around. Too bad. The corruption is so wide spread, from local municipalities to the Feds.
True, and one of the reasons, I think, is that man... (
show quote)
A lot of this lack of interest could be nulled out by our schools, but we let the c****es do away with the parts of history that teach it.
trucksterbud wrote:
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019
Why isn't the Senate investigating Joe Biden's son H****r over China, Ukraine dealings?
By Monica Showalter
Is selling out U.S. national security OK so long as Democrats are doing it?
What a disturbing picture is emerging from the research of Peter Schweizer, who has a new one out about Democratic p**********l frontrunner Joe Biden's son H****r and his business dealings with China.
In a New York Post op-ed, Schweizer writes:
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son H****r B***n flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, H****r B***n's firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government's Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.
If it sounds shocking that a vice president would shape US-China policy as his son — who has scant experience in private equity — clinched a coveted billion-dollar deal with an arm of the Chinese government, that's because it is.
The details get worse and worse and worse, the further you read — the Chinese, for instance, kept news of the deal away from the English-language portion of its website. The agreements signed came just ahead of then–vice president Joe Biden's trips to China. The deals themselves were to buy into companies that were stealing U.S. secrets. The secrets they were after involved U.S. nuclear submarines. And Biden Junior didn't know jack about nuclear things, Chinese things, or venture capital; he was there just for being the vice president's son.
And both Joe and young Hunts insist nothing untoward was going on; the Chinese just chose to partner with H****r based on his amazing business acumen, nothing more.
Schweizer writes that it's actually a pattern of activity — Biden Junior did the same thing in Ukraine, and the ties between H****r and Joe as the foreign cash rolled in for H****r were even more obvious:
Consider the facts. On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, H****r B***n's business partner in the Rosemont Seneca deals, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kiev for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials. The vice president was bringing with him highly welcomed terms of a United States Agency for International Development program to assist the Ukrainian natural-gas industry and promises of more US financial assistance and loans. Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy.
The next day, there was a public announcement that Archer had been asked to join the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural-gas company. Three weeks after that, on May 13, it was announced that H****r B***n would join, too. Neither Biden nor Archer had any background or experience in the energy sector.
...and...
The choice of H****r B***n to handle t***sparency and corporate governance for Burisma is curious, because Biden had little if any experience in Ukrainian law, or professional legal counsel, period. But that didn't stop Burisma from paying the younger Biden what The New York Times has reported was as much as $50,000 a month while the company was under investigation by officials in both Ukraine and abroad.
Joe Biden's trip to Kiev in March 2016, and his threats to withhold $1 billion in foreign aid if Ukrainian officials didn't dismiss the country's top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, take on added meaning when you consider that Shokin's office had been leading an investigation into Burisma's owner.
This guy sounds like a one-man health hazard to U.S. national security, and greedy as heck. These are the kinds of deals Chavista elites engage in over in Venezuela.
And here they are, going on with their deals as if the U.S. were a third-world country, with Joe Biden's son cutting his China and Ukraine deals for buku bucks without any apparent rationale other than family ties.
Meanwhile, people such as George Papadopoulos get thrown into prison for process crimes, and little guys such Navy sailor Kristian Saucier get thrown into prison for taking careless photos. And people such as Don Trump, Jr. get put through the wringer for apparent entrapment operations linked to Fusion GPS and the people who brought us the Steele dossier, not actual spies from an enemy side.
Schweizer thinks that if Congress is going to go around investigating Trump in the pious interest of preventing collusion with foreign actors, then it needs to put its money where its mouth is and get the Senate to start investigating.
But Democrats aren't saying a thing about Biden or his deals — not even the Democrat rivals fighting to knock Joe from his frontrunner status and win their party's p**********l nomination themselves.
Not only do these Democrats not care about Joe's kid's big money deals, they don't care about the assymetry of justice going on against less powerful people. Worst of all, they couldn't care less about the threats to national security that arise out of this Democrat cupidity. They are after all, the party of the man from Hot Springs, Bill Clinton, who sold out U.S. interests to the Chinese in acts the U.S. is still paying for as China builds up its deepwater navy. They are also the party that defended his wife's illegal private server, brimming with classified communications, stored in some guy's bathroom. That of course was to prevent anyone from discovering, via Freedom of Information Act inquiries, that their Clinton Foundation was offering a pay-to-play operation to gamy foreign players such as the uranium-hungry Russians, with Hillary Clinton then the Secretary of State.
This is corruption, fourth world corruption, and it's what's on offer if a Democrat takes power.
Is every Democrat this putridly corrupt? Why aren't they saying anything, if for nothing else to put old Joe out to pasture and reduce the Democrat field for themselves? The times calls for people to do after these seedy dealings to show a difference. In the Senate, as Schweizer argues, and certainly beyond. Thus far, Democrats don't seem to think there's a problem, which makes you wonder what they're planning for themselves.
From American Thinker - May 13, 2019 br br Why is... (
show quote)
Give it time, the DOJ and Barr are very busy in the ones they are starting mow.. Biden's son low kid on the Totem pole.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
