President Trump want's to boot i*****l a***ns from "Public Housing" (Page 2): What the left considers "cooperation" are deals that if Trump agreed to would be like when Boston traded...

Fit2BTied Loc: Texas

permafrost wrote:

many times cooperation has been offered to the orange monkey, but he only wants his way exactly or no way at all..

and his way may change in hours..

What the left considers "cooperation" are deals that if Trump agreed to would be like when Boston traded Babe Ruth to the Yankees for $100,000 to finance a play, or when the Minnesota Vikings traded what turned out to be 3 players, 3 1st rd picks, 3 2nd rd picks, a 3rd, and a 6th to the Dallas Cowboys for Herschel Walker, 2 3rd rd picks, and a 10th rd.

Trump recognized what 2 lbs of manure in a 1 lb bag looks like and said, "No thanks".

bahmer

Carol Kelly wrote:

Put them where they belong...out of here. They are a staggering financial drain on our economy. Now the Democrats want to allow them to v**e. They have nothing to lose when they v**e for the party of giveaways which is what the Democrats are. Give away until the dependence is complete and you’ve got them.

Send them all back to where they came from and then close and lock the door.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Airforceone wrote:

Now if the children are put into child care what is that cost to the American tax payer. Do I have an answer to this issue no I don’t but if you read the Obama legislation on DACA then just maybe there is a solution. But it sure shows your total lack of understanding.

I did not say that it would be public child care. Why do you assume that the government would and should be responsibility for child care. I said find someone who is legally in America and wants the responsibility for your children, perhaps a relative or a couple that are friends and could not have children on their own.

Gatsby

Airforceone wrote:

Now if the children are put into child care what is that cost to the American tax payer. Do I have an answer to this issue no I don’t but if you read the Obama legislation on DACA then just maybe there is a solution. But it sure shows your total lack of understanding.

There is no DACA legislation! Only Obama's executive order. But then facts never matter to you, do they?

bggamers Loc: georgia

waltmoreno wrote:

Agreed! No public housing, no benefits whatsoever,... (show quote)

I was always under the impression that if father and mother are Mexican and the baby is born in another country that child is a citizen of Mexico???

Airforceone

Fit2BTied wrote:

So why is it so hard to get a Democrat to v**e for any of these issues now? Oh, right..."Orange Man Bad!"

Why is it so hard for republicans to v**e for any type of gun control to prevent kids in a classroom from being cut in half with an assault rifle.

Why was it that the last immigration reform bill was passed on a bi-partisan v**e in the senate and the House republicans refused to even v**e on it. Read the immigration reform bill signed into law in Jan. That was passed almost unanimously by the house and senate it was a mirror image of Obama’s plan that was blocked 5 years ago. All the republicans did was change the name on the bill.

bggamers Loc: georgia

Fit2BTied wrote:

What the left considers "cooperation" are deals that if Trump agreed to would be like when Boston traded Babe Ruth to the Yankees for $100,000 to finance a play, or when the Minnesota Vikings traded what turned out to be 3 players, 3 1st rd picks, 3 2nd rd picks, a 3rd, and a 6th to the Dallas Cowboys for Herschel Walker, 2 3rd rd picks, and a 10th rd.

Trump recognized what 2 lbs of manure in a 1 lb bag looks like and said, "No thanks".

never heard that one before

bggamers Loc: georgia

Airforceone wrote:

Why is it so hard for republicans to v**e for any ... (show quote)

Then there has to be something wrong that we don't see. Usually, they will agree to this in a bill but u have to give them something in return often that something is what k**ls it

waltmoreno

bggamers wrote:

I was always under the impression that if father and mother are Mexican and the baby is born in another country that child is a citizen of Mexico???

Well, that is the law in most countries. Except that the good old US, along with just a handful of other countries, automatically grants citizenship even to i*****l a***ns who are inside the jurisdictional boundaries of their country. Beats me why. In the US it has something to do with the court's interpretation of the 14th Amendment which was enacted to insure that newly freed s***es were granted full rights of citizenship.

waltmoreno

Airforceone wrote:

Why is it so hard for republicans to v**e for any ... (show quote)

Sorry airfarce, but you've got it exactly wrong - again. The only thing that's going to prevent kids from being being cut in half by a bad guy with an assault rifle, is a good guy with a firearm. Obviously the bad guy doesn't give a hoot about any laws, including all the laws prohibiting murder of another person.
So by v****g for another type of useless gun control law, you only insure that law abiding people will be sitting ducks for lawless murderers. Exactly how those cowardly murderers like it.
The only type of gun control necessary is the type taught by the NRA, including practice on how to get a tight groupings of the bullet holes on your target. Or what we NRA members refer to as 'group therapy'.

Fit2BTied Loc: Texas

Airforceone wrote:

Why is it so hard for republicans to v**e for any ... (show quote)

Pretty simple actually. Gun control laws don't accomplish anything since law breakers are aptly named. All you're doing is making it harder for law abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families from the danger of armed law breakers. Gun grabbers misquote statistics and ignore what doesn't support (and in many cases refutes) their arguments. Cities with strong antigun laws, like Chicago, Baltimore, and others show that the antigun policies only makes more easy targets is all. And if you're a veteran and you're misusing the "assault rifle" classification, just shame on you.

ExperienceCounts

bggamers wrote:

I was always under the impression that if father and mother are Mexican and the baby is born in another country that child is a citizen of Mexico???

That's what the Mexican constitution says.

jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana

Liberty Tree wrote:

The best and most effective way to stop i*****l i*********n would be to take away their reasons for coming here. That means high penalties for hiring them or providing housing, no public education, no birthright citizenship, no government benefits of any kind, etc.

Absolutely!

Gatsby

Fit2BTied wrote:

Pretty simple actually. Gun control laws don't acc... (show quote)

I wonder who ever came up with the term "assault rifle"? When I was issued a selective fire,

bayonet equipped, flash suppressed, M-16 with 30 round magazines, it was provided

by the "Department of Defense" (DOD), not the "Department of Assault"(DOA).

jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana

Carol Kelly wrote:

Put them where they belong...out of here. They are a staggering financial drain on our economy. Now the Democrats want to allow them to v**e. They have nothing to lose when they v**e for the party of giveaways which is what the Democrats are. Give away until the dependence is complete and you’ve got them.

👍👍👍👍