Mikeyavelli

I think he got a new strain of marijuana.

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

The left accepted the psychological profile of the cult of the individual projected by the necessity felt by society to give itself a cover, what is a book without graphics depicting the contents.

All that however is only superficial what James Dewey attempted was to give stoicism an opportunity the offset hedonism based on pragmatic undertakings which failed because there was no purpose within his beginning and end, which he didn't define, I'm not surprised there was something missing from what he failed to consider.

So James wasn't a proper philosopher,.

Who is are you?.

Does a proper philosopher identify with the cult of the individual, if he didn't he wouldn't be an individual and if he did, then a proper philosopher would be an individual whose imaginings were validated by the pragmatic opportunities available to him, and also by his testimonials concerning the fundamental questions of causation and the reasons for cause.

Rather than just raving on about effects so your not a proper philosopher.

Fate was the beginning and was happy to be there space was enticing but Fate didn't care unfortunately for him but happily for us there was a barrier to communication that was overcome by the bridge between nothing and nothing.

That doesn't sound right, the reason it doesn't is because righ just isn't right nothing is.

elledee

I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but me thinks the Aussie is intellectually f-ing with us....and my condolences to the Australian people

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

There may very well be room for improvement
elledee but I will say on your behalf that every time someone gets a good idea other folks get upset because the didn't think of it first, which is OK with fair minded folks, because in the past ideas weren't really valuable unless they had something to do with selling something commercial.

Products now are now secondary to what some say are the things we reall need which is benefits that come from liberation proselytizing, now anyone who reads this thread can benefit from a very valuable idea to do with freedom that I will divulge due to the goodness in me.

At first of course God was only ideas but the transcendence to substance was a great mystery until now.

What happened was, if I remember rightly elledee, there was a great need for something to be outside of dreaming about, when God began to improvise His own construction within the composite of another that would be independent with conception and ideas so substance could procreate.

And this is the t***h don't forget, although then God was just making it all up, when He asked Space and Fate "did something once exist"

Fate said no of course not substance is a fable, Space was sad about that and Fate was taken back, so he looked at Space intellectually and said "even if substance ever did you would never give it up unless it was another Alien who only wanted to be me ".

Sadness gave the secret away as God was listening intellectually and so He knew how to get the better of Fate by offering Space the opportunity to accumulate.

Sadness began what we are today when Random Probability was offered by God to Space so she could presume something of matter to be within her.

Transcendence to substance was much the same then as it is now products are and were what it's all about.

So sad, products just to fill up an empty mental space, the only thing that's good about consumerism is motorbikes.

Mikeyavelli

Oh boy. That's all?

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

Boys and everything, I suppose it could be said that image is not the complete picture, if it were there would be no such thing as montage, life is only an amalgamation of fact and fiction the composite of the parts we represent become a continuum due to the fact that every way forward is blocked by the innate psychological morphology of the individual.

Democrasy must reduce culture to the lowest dirtiest part of the composite of make up we blemishes our disguises with, take Mike Pence for example, everything is all about the Ukraine his hangouts that had a lot to do with Paul Manafort copping over 7 years and even so, the real culprit could be the next President, Manafort went down for tax and fraudulent endeavours, who else do we know that possibly didn't pay his taxes I just wonder aloud, and I link it to democrasy not being led by the best individuals because there is a thief in everyone.

Nevertheless that is democrasy and where the individual will lead it within the context of open disguise.

Adverse to democrasy is dictatorship where the boys wearing sunglasses at night can come into their own shallow understandings and truely excel at colouring identity with immediate emotion blocking anything seeping down as there is nowhere to go, gravity pulling up preserving privlige with dogmas of abysmal anachronism.

Surely there must be an alternative so the boys can be something better, let's ask the Labour Party of Australia I'm sure they have an answer.

Written and spoken for the advocate of That's all ? Thanks for your reply.

Mikeyavelli

Thanks for your reply.
You sure can spin it.
I haven't read stream of consciousness writing since I read Ulysses in college.

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

Too kind, please check put Secular Talk, Ben Shapiro Angrily Leaves in Middle Of BBC Interview.

If you want to see some real spinning. Thanks for your reply.
But really Ben leaves me for dead.