One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Joe Biden is a Bad Bet....
May 11, 2019 13:13:16   #
fullspinzoo
 
…..and here are the reasons why! https://www.thenation.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-economy-2020/

Reply
May 11, 2019 15:39:11   #
Lonewolf
 
But now with a republican challenger trump don't have a chance

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:04:10   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
But now with a republican challenger trump don't have a chance


What challenger???...What's his name??? Loser???

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:05:40   #
Lonewolf
 
proud republican wrote:
What challenger???...What's his name??? Loser???
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


Read the news

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:08:30   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Read the news


Im reading the news..Nothing about that loser is in the news anymore...

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:11:00   #
Lonewolf
 
proud republican wrote:
Im reading the news..Nothing about that loser is in the news anymore...


Google William wade or what republican is running agenst trump

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:14:02   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Google William wade or what republican is running agenst trump


LOSER is running against our Prez.....I havent heard from that LOSER in a month or more...Maybe because he is a LOSER???!!!....

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:17:31   #
Lonewolf
 
No incumbent has ever won when he is challenged buy a member of his party it gives the e******n to the other party!

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:19:10   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
No incumbent has ever won when he is challenged buy a member of his party it gives the e******n to the other party!


Says who????

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:22:53   #
Lonewolf
 
proud republican wrote:
Says who????
Says who???? img src="https://static.onepolitical... (show quote)


Says history

Reply
May 11, 2019 17:26:54   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Says history


Well then there is first time for everything....Nobody thought that President would win...And look who is our President now!!!

Reply
 
 
May 12, 2019 21:31:24   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
https://reason.com/2019/05/10/liberals-were-very-wrong-about-tax-cuts-again/

"That hasn't stopped former vice president Joe Biden. "There's a $2 trillion tax cut last year. Did you feel it? Did you get anything from it? Of course not. Of course not. All of it went to folks at the top and corporations," the p**********l hopeful claimed the other day. It's a fabrication."




Liberals Were Very Wrong About Tax Cuts. Again.
To be this wrong this often deserves recognition.
DAVID HARSANYI | 5.10.2019 12:01 AM

104
JoeBiden-CSPAN
(C-SPAN)
For those of you who survived the Great GOP Tax Cut Massacre, things are finally looking up. The unemployment rate fell to 3.6 percent last month, the lowest level since 1969. We've now experienced over a full year of unemployment at 4 percent or lower. The economy beat projections, adding another 263,000 jobs in April. Wages are rising.

It was Larry Summers, Bill Clinton's former treasury secretary and Barack Obama's White House economic adviser, who warned that tax reform would lead to over 10,000 dead Americans every year in December of 2017. Summers, considered a reasonable moderate by today's political standards, was just one of the many fearmongers.

The same month, after cautioning that passage of tax cuts would portend "Armageddon," then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi explained that the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a reform of corporate tax codes and a wide-ranging relief, was "the worst bill in the history of the United States Congress." Worse than the Fugitive S***e Act? Worse than the Espionage Act? Worse than congressional approval of the internment of Japanese Americans? That's a really bad bill.

The tenor of left-wing cable news and punditry was predictably panic-stricken. After asserting that the cuts wouldn't help create a single job, Bruce Bartlett told MSNBC that tax relief was "really akin to rape." Kurt Eichenwald tweeted that "America died tonight." "I'm a Depression historian," read the headline on a Washington Post op-ed. "The GOP tax bill is straight out of 1929," proclaimed the same writer. And so on.

None of this is even getting into the MSM's straight news coverage, which persistently (and falsely) painted the bill as a tax cut for the wealthy. "One-Third of Middle Class Families Could End up Paying More Under the GOP Tax Plan" noted Money magazine. An Associated Press headline read, "House Passes First Rewrite of Nation's Tax Laws in Three Decades, Providing Steep Tax Cuts for Businesses, the Wealthy." "Poor Americans Would Lose Billions Under Senate GOP Tax Bill" reported CNN. Yahoo News ran one piece after the next predicting doom.

The GOP tax cut's "unstated goal is to leave the poor and vulnerable in America without the support of their government," an ABC News "analyst" alleged. "It's not enough to give money to rich people. Apparently, Republicans want to kick the poor and middle class in the face, too," a columnist at Washington Post noted, leaning hard into two of the stalest canards about tax policy.

Of course, the notion that allowing Americans to keep more of their own money is tantamount to "giving" them something is just t***sparently specious. Does any liberal really maintain that government owns all your income, and anything you keep is a gift? Tax rates were not handed to us on Mount Sinai, they were cooked up by economists. In t***h, you only "give" taxes, you never keep. And the government only spends.

In any event, the idea that the poor or middle class are being shaken down by the cuts was even more of a dishonest claim. As Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute has pointed out, the TCJA's largest percentage tax cuts went to the middle class. Even the liberal Tax Policy Center estimated that 65 percent Americans paid less last year (6 percent paid more) due to tax reform. More than 44 percent of Americans pay no federal income tax. (Though corporate taxes are also a tax on consumers, so cuts benefitted nearly everyone.)

That hasn't stopped former vice president Joe Biden. "There's a $2 trillion tax cut last year. Did you feel it? Did you get anything from it? Of course not. Of course not. All of it went to folks at the top and corporations," the p**********l hopeful claimed the other day. It's a fabrication.

Whenever you hear people bellowing about the wealthy benefitting most from across-the-board tax cuts, they always leave out the fact that wealthy pay the vast majority of income taxes: The top 20 percent of income earners paid over 95 percent of individual income taxes in 2017, the top 10 percent paid 81 percent and the top 0.1 percent paid nearly a quarter of all federal income taxes.

Supply-side economics isn't a panacea. We're racking up debt and continuing spending as if it doesn't matter. Not all the underlying numbers are positive. There are thousands of economic unknowns that can't be quantified or computed by economists, which is why the central planners and technocrats are almost always wrong. And yes, when the recession finally comes, as it always does, liberals will once again blame tax cuts and deregulation. But to be this wrong this often deserves recognition.

Reply
May 12, 2019 21:39:44   #
Lonewolf
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://reason.com/2019/05/10/liberals-were-very-wrong-about-tax-cuts-again/

"That hasn't stopped former vice president Joe Biden. "There's a $2 trillion tax cut last year. Did you feel it? Did you get anything from it? Of course not. Of course not. All of it went to folks at the top and corporations," the p**********l hopeful claimed the other day. It's a fabrication."




Liberals Were Very Wrong About Tax Cuts. Again.
To be this wrong this often deserves recognition.
DAVID HARSANYI | 5.10.2019 12:01 AM

104
JoeBiden-CSPAN
(C-SPAN)
For those of you who survived the Great GOP Tax Cut Massacre, things are finally looking up. The unemployment rate fell to 3.6 percent last month, the lowest level since 1969. We've now experienced over a full year of unemployment at 4 percent or lower. The economy beat projections, adding another 263,000 jobs in April. Wages are rising.

It was Larry Summers, Bill Clinton's former treasury secretary and Barack Obama's White House economic adviser, who warned that tax reform would lead to over 10,000 dead Americans every year in December of 2017. Summers, considered a reasonable moderate by today's political standards, was just one of the many fearmongers.

The same month, after cautioning that passage of tax cuts would portend "Armageddon," then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi explained that the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a reform of corporate tax codes and a wide-ranging relief, was "the worst bill in the history of the United States Congress." Worse than the Fugitive S***e Act? Worse than the Espionage Act? Worse than congressional approval of the internment of Japanese Americans? That's a really bad bill.

The tenor of left-wing cable news and punditry was predictably panic-stricken. After asserting that the cuts wouldn't help create a single job, Bruce Bartlett told MSNBC that tax relief was "really akin to rape." Kurt Eichenwald tweeted that "America died tonight." "I'm a Depression historian," read the headline on a Washington Post op-ed. "The GOP tax bill is straight out of 1929," proclaimed the same writer. And so on.

None of this is even getting into the MSM's straight news coverage, which persistently (and falsely) painted the bill as a tax cut for the wealthy. "One-Third of Middle Class Families Could End up Paying More Under the GOP Tax Plan" noted Money magazine. An Associated Press headline read, "House Passes First Rewrite of Nation's Tax Laws in Three Decades, Providing Steep Tax Cuts for Businesses, the Wealthy." "Poor Americans Would Lose Billions Under Senate GOP Tax Bill" reported CNN. Yahoo News ran one piece after the next predicting doom.

The GOP tax cut's "unstated goal is to leave the poor and vulnerable in America without the support of their government," an ABC News "analyst" alleged. "It's not enough to give money to rich people. Apparently, Republicans want to kick the poor and middle class in the face, too," a columnist at Washington Post noted, leaning hard into two of the stalest canards about tax policy.

Of course, the notion that allowing Americans to keep more of their own money is tantamount to "giving" them something is just t***sparently specious. Does any liberal really maintain that government owns all your income, and anything you keep is a gift? Tax rates were not handed to us on Mount Sinai, they were cooked up by economists. In t***h, you only "give" taxes, you never keep. And the government only spends.

In any event, the idea that the poor or middle class are being shaken down by the cuts was even more of a dishonest claim. As Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute has pointed out, the TCJA's largest percentage tax cuts went to the middle class. Even the liberal Tax Policy Center estimated that 65 percent Americans paid less last year (6 percent paid more) due to tax reform. More than 44 percent of Americans pay no federal income tax. (Though corporate taxes are also a tax on consumers, so cuts benefitted nearly everyone.)

That hasn't stopped former vice president Joe Biden. "There's a $2 trillion tax cut last year. Did you feel it? Did you get anything from it? Of course not. Of course not. All of it went to folks at the top and corporations," the p**********l hopeful claimed the other day. It's a fabrication.

Whenever you hear people bellowing about the wealthy benefitting most from across-the-board tax cuts, they always leave out the fact that wealthy pay the vast majority of income taxes: The top 20 percent of income earners paid over 95 percent of individual income taxes in 2017, the top 10 percent paid 81 percent and the top 0.1 percent paid nearly a quarter of all federal income taxes.

Supply-side economics isn't a panacea. We're racking up debt and continuing spending as if it doesn't matter. Not all the underlying numbers are positive. There are thousands of economic unknowns that can't be quantified or computed by economists, which is why the central planners and technocrats are almost always wrong. And yes, when the recession finally comes, as it always does, liberals will once again blame tax cuts and deregulation. But to be this wrong this often deserves recognition.
https://reason.com/2019/05/10/liberals-were-very-w... (show quote)


At one time MIT Romney reported making 15 million he's was taxed at 13% and I made around 80,000 and was taxed at 27% what is fair about that.
Do you really think the koch brothers making 60 billion a year need a tax brake.

Reply
May 12, 2019 22:29:04   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
At one time MIT Romney reported making 15 million he's was taxed at 13% and I made around 80,000 and was taxed at 27% what is fair about that.
Do you really think the koch brothers making 60 billion a year need a tax brake.



The first thing you have to ask yourself is "Whose money is it?" It's not the governments, it's not yours, and it's not anyone else's. You didn't earn any of it.

Mitt Romney's 13% of $15 million is $1,950,000; more than you will earn in your life because you never created anything. But you may yet, and you will be able to reap the benefits when you do.

Your 27% of $80,000 is $21,600. But I doubt you paid that much since we have a progressive graduated income tax; You paid nothing on your first several thousand because you took a standard deduction, or you saved even more because you itemized your deductions. You paid 15% only on several thousands of dollars beyond the upper limit of the first bracket. After that, you didn't reach a 27% tax bracket until you earned in the tens of thousands. I know you support many people through your spending. We all do. That's what keeps the economy going. The top 10% income earners pay 80% of the tax.

No one is obligated to pay more or less in taxes than what is legally their share. Is it fair? I don't know. And I didn't write the tax laws or create the tax system. So, I play by the rules. You know what they say, "When it's your turn, they change the rules." But if you think the socialists are correct then you go ahead and v**e for them. But don't be surprised when those who earn more do not get to keep as much or have less to re-invest, and decide to that their "jacks" and go somewhere where the tax burden is less. Then who will pay for everything? You cannot redistribute fairly. This is what is happening in the State of California. The problem with socialism is that eventually, you run out of OPM (other peoples money).

Reply
May 15, 2019 13:38:48   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
https://amac.us/generous-joe-more-free-healthcare-for-i******s-needed/?campaign=daily-news-email

Let's just give EVERYTHING away. Say what you will about Trump, but he has had a consistent 'Big Picture" message for several decades, unlike Biden who is all over the place because he doesn't really know what he stands for.



Generous Joe: More “Free” Healthcare For I******s Needed
Posted Wednesday, May 15, 2019 | By Outside Contributor | 37 Comments
Share Tweet Email
Joe Biden i******s healthcareP**********l candidate Joe Biden wants American taxpayers to pay for illegal-alien healthcare. Indeed, he doesn’t just want us to pay for their healthcare, he says we are obliged to pay for their healthcare.

That’s likely because Biden thinks i******s are American citizens, and doesn’t much care how many are here as long as they v**e the right way.

What Biden didn’t explain when he said we must pay for illegal-alien healthcare is how much such beneficence would cost.

Answer: A lot.

The Question, The Answer

Biden’s demand that we pay for illegal-alien healthcare answered a question he got on Wednesday in Los Angeles from a reporter who wanted to know whether the “undocumented” deserve a free ride.

The question was this: “Do you think that undocumented immigrants who are in this country and are law-abiding should be entitled to federal benefits like Medicare, Medicaid for example?”

Answered Biden, “Look, I think that anyone who is in a situation where they are in need of health care, regardless of whether they are documented or undocumented, we have an obligation to see that they are cared for. That’s why I think we need more clinics in this country.”

Biden forgot to put “free” before clinics, but anyway, the candidate then suggested that Americans who disagree likely have a nasty hang-up about the border-jumping i******s who lie with the facility of Pinocchio when they apply for “asylum.”

“A significant portion of undocumented folks in this country are there because they overstayed their visas,” he continued. “It’s not a lot of people breaking down gates coming across the border,” he falsely averred.

Then came the inevitable. “We” need to watch what we say about all those “undocumented folks.”

“The biggest thing we’ve got to do is tone down the rhetoric,” he continued, because that “creates fear and concern” and ends in describing “undocumented folks” in “graphic, unflattering terms.”

Biden thinks those “undocumented folks” are citizens, as Breitbart noted in its report on his generosity with other people’s money.

In 2014, Biden told the worthies of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce that entering the country illegally isn’t a problem, and Teddy Roosevelt would agree.

“The 11 million people living in the shadows, I believe they’re already American citizens,” Biden said. “Teddy Roosevelt said it better, he said Americanism is not a question of birthplace or creed or a line of dissent. It’s a question of principles, idealism, and character.”

I******s “are just waiting, waiting for a chance to be able to contribute fully. And by that standard, 11 million undocumented aliens are already American.”

Roosevelt also said that “the one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities,” but that inconvenient t***h aside, Biden likely doesn’t grasp just what his munificence — again, with our money — will cost.

The Cost of Illegal-Alien Healthcare

Biden is right that visa overstays are a big problem: 701,900 in 2018, the government reported. But at least those who overstay actually entered the country legally; border jumpers don’t.

But that’s beside the point.

The real problem is the cost of the healthcare, which Forbes magazine estimated to be $18.5 billion, $11.2 billion of it federal tax dollars.

In 2017, the Federation for American Immigration Reform reported a figure of $29.3 billion; $17.1 in federal tax dollars, and $12.2 billion in state tax dollars. More than $15 billion on that total was uncompensated medical care. The rest fell under Medicaid births, Medicaid fraud, Medicaid for illegal-alien children, and improper Medicaid payouts.

The bills for the more than half-million i******s who have crossed the border since the beginning of fiscal 2019 in October are already rolling in.

Speaking at a news conference in March, Brian Hastings, operations chief for Customs and Border Protection (CBP), said about 55 i******s per day need medical care, and that 31,000 i******s will need medical care this year, up from 12,000 last year. Since December 22, he said, sick i******s have forced agents to spend 57,000 hours at hospitals or medical facilities. Cost: $2.2 milllion in salaries. Between 25 percent and 40 percent of the border agency’s manpower goes to the care and maintenance of i******s, he said.

CBP spent $98 million on illegal-alien healthcare between 2014 and 2018.

Hastings spoke before more than 200,000 i******s crossed the border in March and April.

Reprinted with permission from - The New American - by R. Cort Kirkwood

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.