The ideological mirages created by the socialists.
May 3, 2019 09:35:07 #
A few weeks ago I read an article published in this forum that used the deceptive mantra that places the N**is on the far right of the political spectrum. In that moment I did not have time to make any comment about it, but I took note to do so when it was possible.
To begin this writing I want to quote the most renowned N**is and F*****ts in history. Let's see what those nefarious characters say: Adolf Hitler considered himself "the authentic realizer of Marxism" (H. Rauschning, in Hitler told me, De Cooperation, Paris, 1939, p. 112); and nothing less than Goebbels, propaganda minister of N**i Germany, who confessed that - "The national-socialist movement has only one teacher: Marxism" - (Kampf um Berlin, p. 19); and coinciding with Marxist ideologues - he affirmed that "Socialism is the conception of the world of the future that can only be realized in the Socialist State" (Die Zweite Revolution). And also expresses: - "We are socialists and mortal enemies of the capitalist economic system" - (Der Nationalsozialismus, Die Weltanschaung des 20 Jahrhunderts). For his part, and not to be less eloquent, Mussolini is pleased to say that Marx is his spiritual father. (Mussolini and f*****m Ed. Que sais-je, p. 31). N**ism and F*****m are, by definition, a version of Marxist socialism. Really, the “N**i” term is an abbreviation of the words "National Socialist", included in the name of the German Workers' Party that defines the political tendency of that party.
Socialists are illusionist experts and create mirages by repeating a lie. The phrase: "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes t***h" is attributed to Goebbels; but there are those who attribute this phrase to Lenin and say that Goebbels only picked it up. The t***h is that these two promoters of the Marxist idea insisted with emphasis on the "proper" use of lies beyond ethics and morals in order to achieve a "higher purpose".
To make believe that N**i-F*****m is an ideology of the extreme right is the greatest propaganda success of the socialist left in all its history, which has created an ideological mirage in order to confuse and divert attention from its crimes, that has as "superior purpose" -to clean a bit the image of Socialism. Objectively, N**i-f*****m is a socialist (Marxist) ideology, united to the nationalist sentiment; that did not arise in the right but within the socialist movement of the left, after the event that brought about the Russian Revolution of 1917 and that served to propagate all kinds of revolutionary and anti-system socialisms, among which we include those we know as f*****m or N**ism.
The Italian F*****m with its Corporative Chamber, composed by the representatives of the bosses' and workers' unions, was a precursor of N**ism; that in the same way, in its economic policy practiced: the control of prices, the control of wages and the control of all the national production, taking it to the militarization. In those societies totally regimented, all people lived in order to obey the orders of the maximum leader (The Führer in Germany and the Duce in Italy).
The fixing of prices, which was applied by means of a state decree, was a form of attack on private property, since it took away from the producers the options they would have in the free market to apply their resources; and in practice, denied owners the possibility of investing their resources where they wanted.
Ownership of the means of production continued in private hands, but it was the government that decided what should be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom the products would be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged, what wages would be paid, and which dividends or other income would be allowed to receive by the nominal private owner.
The differences between the Marxist collectivist systems lie in the control of the means of production, which in the Soviet system were in the hands of the State; but ultimately, the result is the same in all those systems. That is why there is Soviet-style (Bolshevik) socialism, which Paul Samuelson (Nobel Prize of Economics), calls "state capitalism" and Italian-German (N**i-f*****t) style socialism that has been called "capitalism of comrades".
In both systems the worker continues to receive a salary, just as in capitalism, having to accept the working conditions imposed on him, as there is no claim against the employer, who is the State or obeys orders from it; since the unions that are created are not to defend the worker, but to: indoctrinate, monitor and coerce him.
Both versions of Marxism place the collectivity virtually in the foreground, the reality being that the worker ceases to be the owner of himself; and from being a s***e of the capitalist (according to the Marxists), he becomes a s***e of the system, which supplies him with what is essential to maintain his life. Popular wisdom would say that all these systems are: "The same dog with a different collar". The f*****t systems were and those of socialist c*******m were and continue being repressive systems of control of the masses, without any consideration for human rights, with a single party (composed of a new ruling class, totally alienated from the workers, being enjoyed by that class, benefits to which the worker does not have access), with a maximum leader, subordinate leaders; and according to their rank: bureaucrats, repressors and military, who hold this "totalitarian dictatorship" that, with falsehood and cynicism, Marxism calls "of the proletariat", when it is really "against the proletariat".
The Socialists, using the mantra that motivates this writing, want to distance themselves from F*****m or National Socialism due to the horrors committed by the promoters of this ideology and seek to confuse those who do not know about history and politics; but they still have to distance themselves from c*******t socialism (Soviet, Chinese, Cuban, North Korean, Cambodian, etc.), which committed and continues to commit horrors against humanity that surpass those committed by N**i-F*****m; but they do not find any justification and try to create an ideological mirage for this purpose, which they define as "democratic socialism".
The last Soviet leaders tried to reform the c*******t socialism created by Lenin and Stalin to give it "a human face", in the words of Mikhail Gorbachev; but the plastic surgery became an impossible mission, because the system was monstrous and the patient died during the surgical intervention, reason for which the disintegration of the USSR took place.
The Senator Bernie Sanders, promoter of Socialism in the USA, in a lecture he gave at Harvard University was interpellate by a student originally Russian, whose parents were able to escape from Soviet "paradise" in the decade of the seventies of the last century. This student asked him if he wanted the USA to implement the disastrous and terrifying socialist system that his parents had to suffer in Russia and that has proven to be a failure wherever it has been implemented.
Mr. Sanders, pretending to distance himself from Soviet socialism, made use of the ideological mirage that we mentioned earlier and replied that the socialism he wants to implement is democratic in nature and has as its main purpose the establishment of universal systems of health and education, as well as other labor and social benefits. This response is somewhat simplistic and manipulative. ----- Has Sanders changed his political position? Does he not intend the implantation of the "dictatorship of the proletariat" in the best Soviet style that he admired so much? ----- For more than half a century this individual has been an adept of the c*******t ideology. It is advisable to read an article published in the New York Post on January 16, 2016 written by Paul Sperry, entitled: "Do not be fooled by Bernie Sanders. He is a diehard c*******t "; as well as the Investor's Business Daily editorial on February 19, 2016, entitled: "Bernie Sanders: ‘Democratic Socialist’ Or Out-And-Out Stalinist?”. From the latter we copied the final paragraphs that read as follows: "1989: With the West on the verge of winning the Cold War, Sanders addressed the national conference of the United States Peace Council, another known front of the C*******t Party of the United States, whose members swore 'the triumph of Soviet power in the United States'. ----- This is what Sanders really means by 'political revolution', a war cry that he uttered no less than four times during a recent national debate. ------ Sanders is not just a "socialist." Or even a c*******t sympathizer. He is a hard c*******t collaborator who is very far from the American political current. So far, in fact, that there is undoubtedly a file with his name in the FBI that documents his subversive activities. ----- Hopefully this file will leak to the public before Sanders gets closer to the White House".
As can be seen, Mr. Sanders is an admirer of Stalin's criminal methods and a fanatic of Marxism, which clearly states that Socialism is the stage prior to C*******m and calls it the "dictatorship of the proletariat", which was implanted by Lenin with blood and fire; that it is not democratic in any way and implies the totalitarian control of society by the State, pretension of socialist politicians, which is contrary to the Constitution of the USA based on democratic principles of liberal and conservative ideas.
To achieve the establishment of universal health and education systems it is not necessary to increase the power of the State, systems can be applied in which it participates as supervisor, promoter and contributor, without being executor, controller or administrator, as it is demonstrated that the State is a bad administrator. Systems administered by non-governmental non-profit organizations that use mutualism or cooperativism can be developed, limiting the activity of the insurance companies and those with capital invested in health services that (trying to obtain high dividends for their shareholders) make those services more expensive; not being necessary to give an excessive power to the State and therefore to those who govern; thus avoiding the disaster promoted by the socialist governments when they enforce the so-called dictatorship of the proletariat prescribed by Marx, responsible for so many barbarities in the countries where it has taken place.
The socialists intend to distribute the wealth that others create, as long as they do not achieve total control of society, promoting laws to grant benefits that can only be granted while capitalism exists and there are those who pay taxes to cover such benefits.
Democratic socialism is a clientelist system that, to win v**es, promotes subsidies intended to guarantee economic security, even for those who do not have the will to work, as established in that illogical mirage called the New Green Deal, applauded by some politicians who support populism in the Democratic Party.
I think that the ideological mirage that they have called "democratic socialism", which Marxists are trying to promote at the moment, is a wolf disguised in a sheepskin, tending to achieve the New World Order, which is the new "human face" that Marxists want to create to supplant the failed Proletarian Internationalism, that was promoted by de Soviet socialist c*******m; and those who promote it, use as an incentive for the citizens of poor countries, the emigration towards the developed democratic countries, creating for that purpose the Compact for Migrations of the UN; and in developed democracies, they promote the open border for immigrants and the agitation of the masses through the struggle for social welfare (health, education, labor and social benefits). The propositions of Marxism are like a sweetmeat to tempt people, as if they were children, similar to a carrot placed in front of a horse’s nose, in order that it walks in the desired way by those who control the carrot, without the horse having any opportunity to reach it. They are utilizing the policy of the carrot and the club; only that the club is hidden, to be used when it is possible to impose the "dictatorship of the proletariat".
To begin this writing I want to quote the most renowned N**is and F*****ts in history. Let's see what those nefarious characters say: Adolf Hitler considered himself "the authentic realizer of Marxism" (H. Rauschning, in Hitler told me, De Cooperation, Paris, 1939, p. 112); and nothing less than Goebbels, propaganda minister of N**i Germany, who confessed that - "The national-socialist movement has only one teacher: Marxism" - (Kampf um Berlin, p. 19); and coinciding with Marxist ideologues - he affirmed that "Socialism is the conception of the world of the future that can only be realized in the Socialist State" (Die Zweite Revolution). And also expresses: - "We are socialists and mortal enemies of the capitalist economic system" - (Der Nationalsozialismus, Die Weltanschaung des 20 Jahrhunderts). For his part, and not to be less eloquent, Mussolini is pleased to say that Marx is his spiritual father. (Mussolini and f*****m Ed. Que sais-je, p. 31). N**ism and F*****m are, by definition, a version of Marxist socialism. Really, the “N**i” term is an abbreviation of the words "National Socialist", included in the name of the German Workers' Party that defines the political tendency of that party.
Socialists are illusionist experts and create mirages by repeating a lie. The phrase: "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes t***h" is attributed to Goebbels; but there are those who attribute this phrase to Lenin and say that Goebbels only picked it up. The t***h is that these two promoters of the Marxist idea insisted with emphasis on the "proper" use of lies beyond ethics and morals in order to achieve a "higher purpose".
To make believe that N**i-F*****m is an ideology of the extreme right is the greatest propaganda success of the socialist left in all its history, which has created an ideological mirage in order to confuse and divert attention from its crimes, that has as "superior purpose" -to clean a bit the image of Socialism. Objectively, N**i-f*****m is a socialist (Marxist) ideology, united to the nationalist sentiment; that did not arise in the right but within the socialist movement of the left, after the event that brought about the Russian Revolution of 1917 and that served to propagate all kinds of revolutionary and anti-system socialisms, among which we include those we know as f*****m or N**ism.
The Italian F*****m with its Corporative Chamber, composed by the representatives of the bosses' and workers' unions, was a precursor of N**ism; that in the same way, in its economic policy practiced: the control of prices, the control of wages and the control of all the national production, taking it to the militarization. In those societies totally regimented, all people lived in order to obey the orders of the maximum leader (The Führer in Germany and the Duce in Italy).
The fixing of prices, which was applied by means of a state decree, was a form of attack on private property, since it took away from the producers the options they would have in the free market to apply their resources; and in practice, denied owners the possibility of investing their resources where they wanted.
Ownership of the means of production continued in private hands, but it was the government that decided what should be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom the products would be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged, what wages would be paid, and which dividends or other income would be allowed to receive by the nominal private owner.
The differences between the Marxist collectivist systems lie in the control of the means of production, which in the Soviet system were in the hands of the State; but ultimately, the result is the same in all those systems. That is why there is Soviet-style (Bolshevik) socialism, which Paul Samuelson (Nobel Prize of Economics), calls "state capitalism" and Italian-German (N**i-f*****t) style socialism that has been called "capitalism of comrades".
In both systems the worker continues to receive a salary, just as in capitalism, having to accept the working conditions imposed on him, as there is no claim against the employer, who is the State or obeys orders from it; since the unions that are created are not to defend the worker, but to: indoctrinate, monitor and coerce him.
Both versions of Marxism place the collectivity virtually in the foreground, the reality being that the worker ceases to be the owner of himself; and from being a s***e of the capitalist (according to the Marxists), he becomes a s***e of the system, which supplies him with what is essential to maintain his life. Popular wisdom would say that all these systems are: "The same dog with a different collar". The f*****t systems were and those of socialist c*******m were and continue being repressive systems of control of the masses, without any consideration for human rights, with a single party (composed of a new ruling class, totally alienated from the workers, being enjoyed by that class, benefits to which the worker does not have access), with a maximum leader, subordinate leaders; and according to their rank: bureaucrats, repressors and military, who hold this "totalitarian dictatorship" that, with falsehood and cynicism, Marxism calls "of the proletariat", when it is really "against the proletariat".
The Socialists, using the mantra that motivates this writing, want to distance themselves from F*****m or National Socialism due to the horrors committed by the promoters of this ideology and seek to confuse those who do not know about history and politics; but they still have to distance themselves from c*******t socialism (Soviet, Chinese, Cuban, North Korean, Cambodian, etc.), which committed and continues to commit horrors against humanity that surpass those committed by N**i-F*****m; but they do not find any justification and try to create an ideological mirage for this purpose, which they define as "democratic socialism".
The last Soviet leaders tried to reform the c*******t socialism created by Lenin and Stalin to give it "a human face", in the words of Mikhail Gorbachev; but the plastic surgery became an impossible mission, because the system was monstrous and the patient died during the surgical intervention, reason for which the disintegration of the USSR took place.
The Senator Bernie Sanders, promoter of Socialism in the USA, in a lecture he gave at Harvard University was interpellate by a student originally Russian, whose parents were able to escape from Soviet "paradise" in the decade of the seventies of the last century. This student asked him if he wanted the USA to implement the disastrous and terrifying socialist system that his parents had to suffer in Russia and that has proven to be a failure wherever it has been implemented.
Mr. Sanders, pretending to distance himself from Soviet socialism, made use of the ideological mirage that we mentioned earlier and replied that the socialism he wants to implement is democratic in nature and has as its main purpose the establishment of universal systems of health and education, as well as other labor and social benefits. This response is somewhat simplistic and manipulative. ----- Has Sanders changed his political position? Does he not intend the implantation of the "dictatorship of the proletariat" in the best Soviet style that he admired so much? ----- For more than half a century this individual has been an adept of the c*******t ideology. It is advisable to read an article published in the New York Post on January 16, 2016 written by Paul Sperry, entitled: "Do not be fooled by Bernie Sanders. He is a diehard c*******t "; as well as the Investor's Business Daily editorial on February 19, 2016, entitled: "Bernie Sanders: ‘Democratic Socialist’ Or Out-And-Out Stalinist?”. From the latter we copied the final paragraphs that read as follows: "1989: With the West on the verge of winning the Cold War, Sanders addressed the national conference of the United States Peace Council, another known front of the C*******t Party of the United States, whose members swore 'the triumph of Soviet power in the United States'. ----- This is what Sanders really means by 'political revolution', a war cry that he uttered no less than four times during a recent national debate. ------ Sanders is not just a "socialist." Or even a c*******t sympathizer. He is a hard c*******t collaborator who is very far from the American political current. So far, in fact, that there is undoubtedly a file with his name in the FBI that documents his subversive activities. ----- Hopefully this file will leak to the public before Sanders gets closer to the White House".
As can be seen, Mr. Sanders is an admirer of Stalin's criminal methods and a fanatic of Marxism, which clearly states that Socialism is the stage prior to C*******m and calls it the "dictatorship of the proletariat", which was implanted by Lenin with blood and fire; that it is not democratic in any way and implies the totalitarian control of society by the State, pretension of socialist politicians, which is contrary to the Constitution of the USA based on democratic principles of liberal and conservative ideas.
To achieve the establishment of universal health and education systems it is not necessary to increase the power of the State, systems can be applied in which it participates as supervisor, promoter and contributor, without being executor, controller or administrator, as it is demonstrated that the State is a bad administrator. Systems administered by non-governmental non-profit organizations that use mutualism or cooperativism can be developed, limiting the activity of the insurance companies and those with capital invested in health services that (trying to obtain high dividends for their shareholders) make those services more expensive; not being necessary to give an excessive power to the State and therefore to those who govern; thus avoiding the disaster promoted by the socialist governments when they enforce the so-called dictatorship of the proletariat prescribed by Marx, responsible for so many barbarities in the countries where it has taken place.
The socialists intend to distribute the wealth that others create, as long as they do not achieve total control of society, promoting laws to grant benefits that can only be granted while capitalism exists and there are those who pay taxes to cover such benefits.
Democratic socialism is a clientelist system that, to win v**es, promotes subsidies intended to guarantee economic security, even for those who do not have the will to work, as established in that illogical mirage called the New Green Deal, applauded by some politicians who support populism in the Democratic Party.
I think that the ideological mirage that they have called "democratic socialism", which Marxists are trying to promote at the moment, is a wolf disguised in a sheepskin, tending to achieve the New World Order, which is the new "human face" that Marxists want to create to supplant the failed Proletarian Internationalism, that was promoted by de Soviet socialist c*******m; and those who promote it, use as an incentive for the citizens of poor countries, the emigration towards the developed democratic countries, creating for that purpose the Compact for Migrations of the UN; and in developed democracies, they promote the open border for immigrants and the agitation of the masses through the struggle for social welfare (health, education, labor and social benefits). The propositions of Marxism are like a sweetmeat to tempt people, as if they were children, similar to a carrot placed in front of a horse’s nose, in order that it walks in the desired way by those who control the carrot, without the horse having any opportunity to reach it. They are utilizing the policy of the carrot and the club; only that the club is hidden, to be used when it is possible to impose the "dictatorship of the proletariat".
May 3, 2019 09:41:16 #
Alber wrote:
A few weeks ago I read an article published in thi... (show quote)
If you're going to copy and paste a full article, you really need to show from where and who is the author.
May 3, 2019 09:53:51 #
May 3, 2019 12:13:44 #
May 3, 2019 12:14:55 #
May 4, 2019 09:05:08 #
May 4, 2019 09:45:27 #
Alber wrote:
A few weeks ago I read an article published in thi... (show quote)
Another education of Socialism, Marxism, f*****m, c*******m etc.. Great article that I will keep...
“Socialists are illusionist experts and create mirages by repeating a lie. “The phrase Democratic Socialism is an interesting spin of Socialism itself or so say many while others see it as just a different approach in the Capitalist mantra and spreading the wealth to all rather than the few.. What fails in that analogy is under Capitalism the sky is not the limit and all whom want to invest time, effort and funds to grow themselves is not eliminated like strict adherence to the socialist portfolio, so to speak..... Not to mention the success of the United States is founded on the Capitalistic form of growth and trade..
We need only look at the countries under prior Socialistic regime or C*******m in history and know it does not work..
It ruins countries and fails..
Here is an article I recently read on the same subject~~
It is a scary situation regardless of the conceptual tolerance that “democratic socialism” is not Socialism.. Here, I must respectally disagree..
When we see “Socialism in America got yet another boost last week when Florida Democrats chose "progressive" Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum to be their candidate in the fall gubernatorial e******n. Gillum's primary win comes a little more than three months after The Nation gleefully declared that "Socialism Is on a Winning Streak."
"Four candidates backed by Democratic Socialists of America won Pennsylvania primaries Tuesday, and come November they could all be legislators," The Nation said on May 18, two days after socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also won a New York City congressional Democratic primary.
The socialist momentum continued last month when U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., unloaded a bill called the Accountable Capitalism Act. It would place the boot of government squarely on the economy's throat, should it become law.
Given socialism's upswing, shouldn't Warren, socialist U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Ocasio-Cortez, Gillum, and others come clean and adopt the motto "Socialism Now, Socialism Tomorrow, Socialism Forever"? After all, socialists have taken over the Democratic Party....Whether admitted or not.. And I’m not referring to the junior socialists here but rather those “ special interest groups, like, the Democratic Socialist of America, who have an agenda far deeper than presently flaunted.. They are the ones that really control them..
It is a movement towards full Socialism. I am sorry to say..
Please read here for further comments~~
https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/socialism-ruin-nations/
May 4, 2019 09:48:02 #
Alber wrote:
Morgan: I wrote the articule. It is my opinion. When I quote somebody I say it,
Well done and because you personally wrote it may I retain a copy and where needed use it, citing you as the author, of course..
I have a great number of people I would like to send it to..
May 4, 2019 10:23:06 #
TommyRadd
Loc: Midwest USA
Alber wrote:
Morgan: I wrote the articule. It is my opinion. When I quote somebody I say it,
I'm with LindaJoy, I'd like to know how you would like to be cited. You can message me if you prefer.
Thank you!
May 4, 2019 10:52:16 #
Lindajoy and Tommy Radd: My name is: Alfred Bernal from there Alber. I thank you for your interest in what I have written, you can spread it as you see fit. My aim is to fight the ignorant who write here in OPP in favor of Marxist ideas. Many of them do not know what they defend, they are useful fools. Socialism is Marxist, therefore c*******t and N**i-f*****t, you must have lived to know what it really is. Many liberals do not know what they defend when they lend themselves to the game of the Socialists, who are their enemies. While liberalism was considered left-wing decades ago, it is no longer so and became a centrist idea on the political spectrum, along with the conservatives. I think that the Democratic Party is at a crossroads and will face great problems because it has been infiltrated by the Marxists.
May 4, 2019 12:06:29 #
TommyRadd
Loc: Midwest USA
Alber wrote:
Lindajoy and Tommy Radd: My name is: Alfred Bernal... (show quote)
Alfred,
Truly, many do not realize the lies they have been sold. I'm sure we all have some unt***hs we've bought into, I know I have in the past, and thus remain open to hearing other perspectives, because I haven't received an immunization inoculation that I know of! Lol! Thus, the only remedy I know is open dialog; while maintaining a semblance of balance between what we "know is true" and an open mind to consider that some ideas we hold turn out to be necessary stepping stones to get to other ideas, and sometimes we can all be simply in need of correction. Bottom line, God made us humans to need each other, and beware at the same time. We all have our moments to be the ones doing the correcting and being corrected.
This is another area where l*****ts have bought into the mirage: claiming themselves to be "liberal" and "tolerant" and even "anti-f*****t" while being the most opposite of those virtues in practice. "A****a" being an obvious case in point! And l*****ts, rather than condemn them, justify them. And that is exactly how it starts! And why it concludes with socialists and c*******ts being the most destructive ideologies of recent history, bar none!
It is a good thing you are doing, and you appear to have the talent and demeanor for the work! I sincerely pray blessings on your work! In the name of Jesus Messiah!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.