Where was the Collusion? (Page 2): Thanks, Pennylynn :sm24: :sm09:...

debeda

Pennylynn wrote:

I posted it. What a great offer, but I doubt it will be received well!

Thanks, Pennylynn

PeterS

Pennylynn wrote:

In the Mueller report we read that Trump did not c... (show quote)

Blade and several other conservatives were running around saying that there was a conspiricy by a Hillary/Obama cabal--which was part of the "Deep State"--whose purpose was to take Donald Trump down. At the center of this nefarious plot Rosenstein had conspired to hire Mueller and it was his job to cobble together the "evidence," true or not, to take down the president of the United States. Now I pointed out to Blade and several others that Rosenstein was appointed by Trump and confirmed by a Republican senate so that would mean they were part of the conspiricy to take down the president. Now this little qurke in Republican logic didn't bother Blade--he still believes Rosenstein was out to do in his beloved DJT--but logically there was just no way that could be.

Now your accusation is that Mueller should have been looking for collusion from both parties? Do you think he didn't do so because he was a plant for the Democrat party? Now I know you would never say that but that does seem to be your accusation. Well if you've read the Mueller report it looks like he did his job and the only thing Trump is chargable on would be obstruction of justice--for which I believe there were 11 instances cited.

Now the question begged of course is why was Donald so determined to obstruct the Muller investigation when he didn't have anything to worry about? We will probably never know the answer to that but if any impeachment comes about it will be for that reason...

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Pennylynn wrote:

In the Mueller report we read that Trump did not c... (show quote)

From everything that I have been reading, once the IG report is released, and trump declassifies the FISA documents, there will be quite a few high profile indictments of people in the FBI and DOJ. Perhaps we may also see some indictments of Washington politicians. It's going to be an interesting 18 months.

bahmer

Pennylynn wrote:

In the Mueller report we read that Trump did not c... (show quote)

Very good question there Pennylynn I will be interested to see the liberals view on this as well. The Steel Dossier was funded and paid for by the Hillary Clinton Campaign so I can't see any reason why they shouldn't classify that as collusion do you?

Seth

dtucker300 wrote:

A SHORT POEM

TOO GOOD NOT TO PASS ON TO ALL

A Short Post Mueller Poem to Democrats:

“The investigation is over,

The talking is done,

Your party lost,

My party won.

So let us be friends,

Let arguments pass,

I’ll hug my elephant,

You kiss your ass.”

bggamers Loc: georgia

Pennylynn wrote:

As things started coming out in the news, the "investigation" ended quickly. Makes me think that they found more on the DNC than on the RNC.

the DNC is so corrupt they could easily sink a ship with the weight of the wrong doing on their side

debeda

ACP45 wrote:

From everything that I have been reading, once the IG report is released, and trump declassifies the FISA documents, there will be quite a few high profile indictments of people in the FBI and DOJ. Perhaps we may also see some indictments of Washington politicians. It's going to be an interesting 18 months.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Pennylynn wrote:

In the Mueller report we read that Trump did not c... (show quote)

I guess the witch hunt was to make the tin foil hat wearers happy. Why they only looked at Republicans is they already knew the answers as far as democraps. Mueller hid Uranium One, he was already a criminal with the Whitey Bulger trial. Collusion? Not a crime, but they'll pull something like Trump's using Russian dressing he's colluding.

woodguru

Pennylynn wrote:

In the Mueller report we read that Trump did not c... (show quote)

Wake up it's not collusion, Mueller said there was no such thing. But Trump campaign people had endless dealings with Russians, and there were many indictments that support that.

woodguru

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

I guess the witch hunt was to make the tin foil hat wearers happy. Why they only looked at Republicans is they already knew the answers as far as democraps. Mueller hid Uranium One, he was already a criminal with the Whitey Bulger trial. Collusion? Not a crime, but they'll pull something like Trump's using Russian dressing he's colluding.

Collusion not a crime, but there were a lot of indictments on things that were, and 13 redacted names that are being handled in other districts.

woodguru

dtucker300 wrote:

A SHORT POEM

TOO GOOD NOT TO PASS ON TO ALL

A Short Post Mueller Poem to Democrats:

“The investigation is over,

The talking is done,

Your party lost,

My party won.

So let us be friends,

Let arguments pass,

I’ll hug my elephant,

You kiss your ass.”

It isn't even close to being over, read the full Mueller report section two on obstruction. I think it will be handled before the e******n, but the indictable obstruction issues will be handled either before the e******n or after if a dem is put in the white house. You see what a change of congress meant, imagine a change of senate or white house.