And so it begins, Emoluments Violations
May 1, 2019 09:38:33 #
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/EmolumentsDCmtd-ORDER.pdf
In its previous Opinion, the Court held that plaintiffs,
approximately 201 Members of the 535 Members of the United
States Senate and House of Representatives, had standing to sue
defendant Donald J. Trump in his official capacity as President
of the United States (“the President”) for alleged violations of
the Foreign Emoluments Clause (“the Clause”). See Blumenthal v.
Trump, 335 F. Supp. 3d 45, 72 (D.D.C. 2018) (“Blumenthal I”).
The President has moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint for
failure to state a claim because, inter alia, he contends that
“Emolument” should be narrowly construed to mean “profit arising
from an official’s services rendered pursuant to....
...in summary, we are not going to impeach him, we'll make him unelectable
In its previous Opinion, the Court held that plaintiffs,
approximately 201 Members of the 535 Members of the United
States Senate and House of Representatives, had standing to sue
defendant Donald J. Trump in his official capacity as President
of the United States (“the President”) for alleged violations of
the Foreign Emoluments Clause (“the Clause”). See Blumenthal v.
Trump, 335 F. Supp. 3d 45, 72 (D.D.C. 2018) (“Blumenthal I”).
The President has moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint for
failure to state a claim because, inter alia, he contends that
“Emolument” should be narrowly construed to mean “profit arising
from an official’s services rendered pursuant to....
...in summary, we are not going to impeach him, we'll make him unelectable
May 1, 2019 09:42:55 #
Sew_What wrote:
You guys of been screaming emollient violation since President Trump took office. Yet no one has anything to substantiate any such allegation.
Don’t you know that President Trump is an about to do anything that violates any clause of the Constitution by now? He knows how much everyone is trying to find anything to put them out on.
Contrarily this is not something that will make President Trump ineligible it is something that will once again motivate the people to stand in support of the president Recognizing it’s just another flimsy allegation with no foundation trying to oust him from office...
Pray tell, please do continue 2016 they tried the same thing and look who is the president now.
May 1, 2019 09:54:43 #
lindajoy wrote:
You guys of been screaming emollient violation sin... (show quote)
I have never posted anything about Emoluments Violations...and I am one person, I am definitely not a "you guys of been screaming...", wh**ever the heck that means.
If you bothered to read the first couple of pages, there is cause to investigate as it should have been done 3 years before he bothered to apply for his candidacy.
May 1, 2019 14:34:58 #
Sew_What wrote:
I have never posted anything about Emoluments Violations...and I am one person, I am definitely not a "you guys of been screaming...", wh**ever the heck that means.
If you bothered to read the first couple of pages, there is cause to investigate as it should have been done 3 years before he bothered to apply for his candidacy.
If you bothered to read the first couple of pages, there is cause to investigate as it should have been done 3 years before he bothered to apply for his candidacy.
You guys meaning “ party dems” inclusive ...
Yup, for two years now there’s been “a cause” to investigate ~~ ppffttt
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.