Moron speak, if you try to talk about r****m you are the r****t
The Democrat/socialist Party has been, and still is the depository for r****m in America. They do have a very good propaganda machine to keep this fact hidden.
Ricktloml wrote:
The Democrat/socialist Party has been, and still is the depository for r****m in America. They do have a very good propaganda machine to keep this fact hidden.
The Democrats only want the illegal Hispanics here so they can force them to live on their plantation, be dependent on government handouts and v**e for them. That is the epitome of r****m.
woodguru wrote:
Moron speak, if you try to talk about r****m you are the r****t
Is that right? Then anyone on the left who talks about r****m is r****t according to you. And they always bring it up.
Well done.
woodguru wrote:
Moron speak, if you try to talk about r****m you are the r****t
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA so ridiculous HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!
Ricktloml wrote:
The Democrat/socialist Party has been, and still is the depository for r****m in America. They do have a very good propaganda machine to keep this fact hidden.
Amen, just as they've done with b****s in Chicago and minorities everywhere. It's a part of their playbook they don't talk about. Why do you think there is so much diversity (something I have no problem with, just wish they were higher IQs) yet the front runners for President are white? Oh, Biden banking on the unions backing him? I think everyone knows unions are about as corrupt as Hillary. Correction, union leaders. They live the life of Reilly while members struggle to pay their dues. There is a big thing in the teachers' union about this.
The actual struggle between rivals is "religion."
Ricktloml wrote:
The Democrat/socialist Party has been, and still is the depository for r****m in America. They do have a very good propaganda machine to keep this fact hidden.
It's really well hidden by r****t right wingers that h**ed Obama.
Who is responsible for the make up the conservitive supreme court-Republicans.
what is the fundamentalest philosophy of a conservative?
Which supreme Court justices has the conservative philosophy of constructionism,which essentially means the Constitution should be adhered to in it's earliest conception,without equalizing amendments.
Without those equalizing amendments,does this not denote that that those whom support this form of governing hold an attitude of biasness of g****r inferiority,also race inferiority.
Does this not imply r****m on their part,amongst other social improprieties.
woodguru wrote:
Moron speak, if you try to talk about r****m you are the r****t
I disagree - partly. I believe we can talk about r****m without being labeled a r****t because if we don't, it's like believing that just ignoring the subject of r****m will cause r****m to disappear as if it never existed. All you have to do is understand Woodrow Wilson's policies towards b****s when the U.S. entered WWI and implemented the draft to understand that Wilson's policies were open r****t. So, you have to talk about r****m in order to understand how Wilson's attitude and policies set back race relations 50 years. However, I agree with you in that many people who speak about r****m are r****t themselves. They use a discussion of race as a smoke screen because they cannot discuss anything on an intellectual level (i.e. policy), but only on an emotional level. Here is a good example of understanding Wilson and why many believe he was a r****t:
https://tinyurl.com/ybvcfhra
rafterman wrote:
I disagree - partly. I believe we can talk about r****m without being labeled a r****t because if we don't, it's like believing that just ignoring the subject of r****m will cause r****m to disappear as if it never existed. All you have to do is understand Woodrow Wilson's policies towards b****s when the U.S. entered WWI and implemented the draft to understand that Wilson's policies were open r****t. So, you have to talk about r****m in order to understand how Wilson's attitude and policies set back race relations 50 years. However, I agree with you in that many people who speak about r****m are r****t themselves. They use a discussion of race as a smoke screen because they cannot discuss anything on an intellectual level (i.e. policy), but only on an emotional level. Here is a good example of understanding Wilson and why many believe he was a r****t:
https://tinyurl.com/ybvcfhraI disagree - partly. I believe we can talk about ... (
show quote)
Since w****s (a specific white) analyze and define other people even other w****s that are by his labeling are considered Caucasoid and doesn't like the reciprocal of it. we should redefine and consider is r****t the correct analyzation of "YOU PEOPLE'S"problem; is it not ignorance,(would should only be used as a quick generalization of the answer to the problem ,to accommodate the average Joe six pack guy/ gal)as oppose to the more elaborate analyzation of him having a deep seated psychiatric disorder which stems from a massive insecurity of their selves which instigates a fear,inturn this triggers a perpetual defensive mechanism that's constantly thrust at the world.This would be much like what we have done for closet homosexuals(called homophobes) who constantly malign and attack (then hide behind mythical morality) homosexual people ,despite the fact that in general they don't bother their attacker.To further add and define what the so called r****t may be,(keeping on topic) secondarily of course,there might exist a g****r dysphoria phenomenon as does the homophobe has.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.