You have a bunch of soy boys running for President and their way to respect woman running is pledge they will make some woman Vice President. Nothing about qualifications all identity politics. Thank God companies don’t work like that. Second point. If these Democrat men really thought it was time for a woman President why are any of them running ?
JFlorio wrote:
You have a bunch of soy boys running for President and their way to respect woman running is pledge they will make some woman Vice President. Nothing about qualifications all identity politics. Thank God companies don’t work like that. Second point. If these Democrat men really thought it was time for a woman President why are any of them running ?
Terrific points, JFlorio
And I would add to that why do NONE of the dems even countenance the idea that 2016 was a repudiation of Obama's uber liberal policies? They're all tripping over themselves to see who can come up with the goofiest ideas. And those with NO ideas fall back on attacking our President. Sheesh
debeda wrote:
Terrific points, JFlorio img src="https://static.... (
show quote)
Not that long ago some of the Democrats ideas would have been in comedy skits on Saturday Night Live.
JFlorio wrote:
Not that long ago some of the Democrats ideas would have been in comedy skits on Saturday Night Live.
You're right. Like in 2007.....
Do you think "Saturday Night Live" will do a skit about ...
"Finding Hillary's Lost Emails in Obama's White House"....lol
JFlorio wrote:
You have a bunch of soy boys running for President and their way to respect woman running is pledge they will make some woman Vice President. Nothing about qualifications all identity politics. Thank God companies don’t work like that. Second point. If these Democrat men really thought it was time for a woman President why are any of them running ?
What's to square?
Calling the male Democrats running for President 'soy boys' seems strange and incoherent from the folks who support and worship a man who's personal Vietnam involved STDs.
Since there are plenty of women qualified to run for President, it's only logical there are plenty of women qualified to be vice-President if one of the men win the primaries. Also, your statement that it's all about 'identity politics' shows your own assumption that a person's sex is their identity. As I'm sure you're aware, plenty of women v**ed for the President, so that shoots a hole in your idea that identity is defined by sex.
Your second point is also moot, as it too assumes that sex is a defining identity. One can accept that women are qualified to be President and not treat them differently. Men have to run the primary gauntlet, so why shouldn't women?
This is just a red herring. That you think there's an issue just shows the limits of your own thinking.
working class stiff wrote:
What's to square?
Calling the male Democrats running for President 'soy boys' seems strange and incoherent from the folks who support and worship a man who's personal Vietnam involved STDs.
Since there are plenty of women qualified to run for President, it's only logical there are plenty of women qualified to be vice-President if one of the men win the primaries. Also, your statement that it's all about 'identity politics' shows your own assumption that a person's sex is their identity. As I'm sure you're aware, plenty of women v**ed for the President, so that shoots a hole in your idea that identity is defined by sex.
Your second point is also moot, as it too assumes that sex is a defining identity. One can accept that women are qualified to be President and not treat them differently. Men have to run the primary gauntlet, so why shouldn't women?
This is just a red herring. That you think there's an issue just shows the limits of your own thinking.
What's to square? br br Calling the male Democr... (
show quote)
Your like a broken record stuck on stupid. First off I’m no Trump supporter. I support his policies. Subtle difference but a difference. It definitely is identity politics. They are pandering and if you can’t see that your even dumber than I thought.
JFlorio wrote:
Your like a broken record stuck on stupid. First off I’m no Trump supporter. I support his policies. Subtle difference but a difference. It definitely is identity politics. They are pandering and if you can’t see that your even dumber than I thought.
You are in good company. Many people increasingly feel the same. "Like" President Trump or not, his policies are good for America. And THAT'S what more an more people like
JFlorio wrote:
Your like a broken record stuck on stupid. First off I’m no Trump supporter. I support his policies. Subtle difference but a difference. It definitely is identity politics. They are pandering and if you can’t see that your even dumber than I thought.
LOL. I expected nothing more from you than name calling.
working class stiff wrote:
LOL. I expected nothing more from you than name calling.
I see you couldn’t rebut. Apparently my description was accurate.
President Trump should ask Mike Pence to retire. He then will ask Nicky Haley to be his VP candidate, and this ticket will dance right into the WH
Helilord wrote:
President Trump should ask Mike Pence to retire. He then will ask Nicky Haley to be his VP candidate, and this ticket will dance right into the WH
Did anyone notice that the signs at his rally last night mostly said "Trump 2020". I'm thinking he will be looking for a running mate who will be electable in 2024.
JFlorio wrote:
You have a bunch of soy boys running for President and their way to respect woman running is pledge they will make some woman Vice President. Nothing about qualifications all identity politics. Thank God companies don’t work like that. Second point. If these Democrat men really thought it was time for a woman President why are any of them running ?
It's terribly funny when a trumpbot mentions anything about "qualifications". Trump is the most unqualified loon to ever inhabit the WH.
debeda wrote:
Did anyone notice that the signs at his rally last night mostly said "Trump 2020". I'm thinking he will be looking for a running mate who will be electable in 2024.
Trump is nonelectable in 2020, let alone 2024. Pence is a sock puppet who will disappear with Trump.
working class stiff wrote:
What's to square?
Calling the male Democrats running for President 'soy boys' seems strange and incoherent from the folks who support and worship a man who's personal Vietnam involved STDs.
Since there are plenty of women qualified to run for President, it's only logical there are plenty of women qualified to be vice-President if one of the men win the primaries. Also, your statement that it's all about 'identity politics' shows your own assumption that a person's sex is their identity. As I'm sure you're aware, plenty of women v**ed for the President, so that shoots a hole in your idea that identity is defined by sex.
Your second point is also moot, as it too assumes that sex is a defining identity. One can accept that women are qualified to be President and not treat them differently. Men have to run the primary gauntlet, so why shouldn't women?
This is just a red herring. That you think there's an issue just shows the limits of your own thinking.
What's to square? br br Calling the male Democr... (
show quote)
HA HA HA HA HA HA some people are too stupid to see the obvious !!!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.