Richard Rowland wrote:
Rapprochement and heinous? Doesn't seem compatible.
The ibea of racial supremacism is heinous to me, I had to work with these blokes who had such attitudes all day every day, I remember when the Catholics were told to abandon such heinous attitudes, some did but it wasn't easy for them, living with any addiction is tough, especially when the relief valve is blocked by politics
The White Australia Policy was a psychological relief valve which was taken down "gradually" starting after the war 1945.
I think because we stopped the Japanese in New Guinea when our reinforcements we were leaving Libya, - ( many Australia Soldiers were the Rats of Tubruq ) , - and going to Borneo, the ships were diverted by John Curtin, I forgot some of the story my father was a driver in the Australian Infantry Corp in Tubruk and New Guinea.
But that was a big reason why we started to change the White Australia Policy, there was a diabolical contradiction exposed, between the need we had for the natives who sided with us against the Japanese, and the way we treated them, it was the New Guinea Natives that mainly allowed our Service Men to survive in the jungle, the enemy didn't have that assistance and mostly starved.
Putting that specific history aside it could very well be a heinous wide spread attitude could resurface and create a rapproachement within a fractured society, and many people now believe that it can, but they wouldn't admit their aspirations were heinous, humm, I see the problum.
This is hypothetical , - say a really heinous attitude was resurrected and everyone agreed so there was no contradiction existing and the heinous attitude was seen as admirable but everything turned out to be BS and society collapsed, then you could certainly say a heinous social attitude was compatible with rapproachement but it didn't work out.
Thanks for the reply.