One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Terrorist arrested on southern border.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 22, 2019 15:33:34   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Citizens can not detain someone for what they MAY do, only what they HAVE done. Citizens can not detain someone on a misdemeanor unless it is disturbing the peace and simply crossing the border illegally does not qualify as disturbing the peace by itself. Again I say, two wrongs don't make a right.

By what I have seen of the crazy whack jobs that join up with these m*****as... Let's just say the ones I have met, they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a gun or even other people for that matter. They were likely disturbing the peace far more than any of the border crossers.
Citizens can not detain someone for what they MAY ... (show quote)




You've never met in person with anyone who is observing our border.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 15:36:45   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
bggamers wrote:
send them some bet they have a change of heart when their health system tanks in less than 6 months and their budget disappears taking care of them that's what happened here when we got a wave they took this town to the cleaners don't know what happened but we haven't seen any in several years guess they moved on



đź‘Ťđź‘Ťđź‘Ťđź‘ŤExactly, these uninvited aliens are a real crisis.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 15:39:21   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Your biased opinion is noted. Unsubstantiated, but noted.


Not unsubstantiated, I have met a fair group of so called m*****a men and most if not all are complete whack jobs, many of whom claim sovereign statehood, several of which also on the dole. How whacked out can one get to claim sovereign statehood while collecting social security disability?

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2019 15:40:48   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
byronglimish wrote:
You've never met in person with anyone who is observing our border.


Likely not but I have met quite a few so called m*****a men and I can't honestly claim any of them were entirely sane. Most, nowhere near sane.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 16:30:19   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Not unsubstantiated, I have met a fair group of so called m*****a men and most if not all are complete whack jobs, many of whom claim sovereign statehood, several of which also on the dole. How whacked out can one get to claim sovereign statehood while collecting social security disability?

Yes! Unsubstantiated! You saying that you have met with people, doesn’t substantiate your claim. Do you have any photos, videos, emails, or even letters of correspondence that you could share with us in order to substantiate your claims? Otherwise, this is referred to as hearsay...

And how does receiving a disability check rob them of their statehood? If your misunderstanding was correct, then nearly half the U.S. population will have lost their statehood. Absurd.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 16:47:31   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Likely not but I have met quite a few so called m*****a men and I can't honestly claim any of them were entirely sane. Most, nowhere near sane.


Weekend warriors are comprised of l*****t and rights.

The guys actually touring our border are much different.

The i***t who was arrested for felon in possession of a firearm is an exception to the rule.

However if it goes to all out invasion, you'd better hope any willing and able person would protect you.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 17:11:22   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Yes! Unsubstantiated! You saying that you have met with people, doesn’t substantiate your claim. Do you have any photos, videos, emails, or even letters of correspondence that you could share with us in order to substantiate your claims? Otherwise, this is referred to as hearsay...

And how does receiving a disability check rob them of their statehood? If your misunderstanding was correct, then nearly half the U.S. population will have lost their statehood. Absurd.


Obviously you have no clue what the "sovereign state" movement is, I am guessing you don't know ANY m*****a men then as many of them nut jobs also tend to be "sovereign staters" as well. When you claim sovereign statehood, you are renouncing your U.S. citizenship and do your best to stop paying taxes and stop registering your vehicle or renewing your license. I am not sure if anyone ever succeeds at actually severing themselves from the U.S. and what will actually happen if the U.S. accepts your sovereignty but there are no shortages of nut jobs that try to server their citizenship and don't seem to realize that if they succeed, they will still be subject to our laws and taxation so long as they remain in our country.

I mis-spoke, the movement seems to call themselves "sovereign citizens", wh**ever, many so called m*****a men also claim sovereignty as well. Interestingly enough, those I met didn't seem to have anything against money but then maybe they aren't "kosher sovereign citizens". How many Jewish folk do you know that will eat a bacon cheeseburger which is a double no-no as it has bacon (made from pork) and the ground beef isn't kosher either at any restaurant that I know of. For ground beef to be "kosher" it can only be taken from the front portion of the cow, nothing from the hip back.

Anyway you look at it, of the so called m*****a men I have met, I wouldn't consider a one of them fully sane and I really don't care what you think you have to say about whether you believe I know any or not, I really don't care about your opinion at all if you truly want honesty.

I actually knew some of them BEFORE they joined and BEFORE they joined, they seemed a lot more "sane". I think it has to do with all the nut jobs in the groups that corrupt the minds of the newcomers. A good reason for me to avoid joining them as they have tried to get me to do in the past.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2019 17:55:56   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
A number of right wing nationalist terrorists were illegally holding people at gunpoint in New Mexico. The FBI has so far only made one arrest but more are soon to come. Obviously Trumps justice department will try to soft peddle this but the men playing soldier will be held accountable in New Mexico if the Feds drop the ball.

From this mornings Guardian:

A member of an armed rightwing m*****a group accused of illegally detaining migrants at the US-Mexico border has been arrested, officials said on Saturday.

Videos appear to show armed m*****a detaining migrants at US-Mexico border

The FBI arrested Larry Mitchell Hopkins, 69, for alleged unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition , days after his group posted videos that appeared to show armed men stopping migrants at the border in New Mexico, ordering them to sit on the ground and coordinating with US border patrol agents to have them taken into custody.

“Today’s arrest by the FBI indicates clearly that the rule of law should be in the hands of trained law enforcement officials, not armed vigilantes,” the New Mexico attorney general, Hector Balderas, said in a statement.

On Thursday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called for an investigation into the pro-Trump, anti-immigrant men who have been patrolling the border and calling themselves the United Constitutional Patriots (UCP).

The ACLU in New Mexico described the group as “an armed f*****t m*****a organization” made up of “vigilantes”, saying they were working to “kidnap and detain people seeking asylum” and had directly made illegal arrests and kidnappings and held people at gunpoint.
A number of right wing nationalist terrorists were... (show quote)


Sounds like a citizen's arrest. Last I heard holding someone under a citizen's arrest isn't against the law. Not even in the progressive state on NM. In New Mexico, a citizen's arrest is defined as: The arrest of a person may be lawfully made also by any peace officer or a private person without a warrant.

But the charge of kidnapping immigrants when the article first says they stopped migrants at the border, needs some clarification. Just because someone is an immigrant, or a citizen; does not give them the right to cross the border between ports of entry. Nor would immigrants be seeking asylum. You either request to immigrate OR request asylum. And once you ARE an immigrant, would you then seek asylum from the US? If that were so, wouldn't they seek asylum of a different country if they feared their lives were endangered by the US? Later the article said "migrant" So which are they? Immigrants or migrants? But if the article means NOT an immigrant, but an i*****l a***n, then holding them at gunpoint while calling for CBP will earn you a big thank you from CBP.

AS for their having illegal guns and illegal ammo, NM is an open carry state. Only permits are needed for conceal carry. Nor must ammo be registered as in DC where each round must be registered. So unless the guns were machine guns without a permit, or the citizens were felons; why were the guns said to be illegal?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_New_Mexico

Funny thing is when an Islamic group had a compound with kidnapped children being trained for suicide missions, where at least one kidnapped child's body was found and the living kids showed signs of physical abuse and malnourishment, NM judge gave them a slap on the wrist. Nor were they listed as terrorists in the media. But holding i*****l a***ns at gunpoint while waiting the arrival of CBP is called terrorism.

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/16/639419898/toddlers-remains-that-were-discovered-in-n-m-compound-identified-as-missing-chil

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:00:26   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
Scumbag r****t vigilantes, the more prosecutions the better to get weapons out of the hands of these nuts and put them behind bars.


Get the guns out of the hands of law abiding active American citizens while ignoring the Obama armed to the teeth cartel members crossing our border regularly. Sounds about what I'd expect of the left.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:00:51   #
Carol Kelly
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Of course that’s their description, they are an anti-American organization that has enough troubles of their own to worry about. You won’t hear another thing about this unless someone gets hurt or k**led, which would more than likely be a US citizen, then we won’t hear from you or the ACLU, because it wouldn’t fit your narrative.

Funny how you don’t post anything about Mexican nationals “kidnapping” at gun point, US military, on US soil. You’re so t***sparent.

May the Lord keep these brave citizens and their families safe as they continue with this righteous endeavor, Amen.
Of course that’s their description, they are an an... (show quote)


I love your manner of taking apart posts that have no real meaning. I almost said “stupid” but that’s worse than cursing.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:02:50   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
No one has the right to arm themselves as a mob and confront others. This go’s from the Crips and MS13 to this band of vigilante scumbags. All of them are nothing but cowardly thugs terrorizing people in a false effort to “protect” territory to which they lay no legitimate claim. Write all the checks you want, they will need to line the pockets of some world class douchbag lawyers to get them out of this, you might as well pay the freight.


So how do you arm yourselves as a mob vs arm yourselves as a group of US citizens? And what about a group of armed citizens is illegal?

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2019 18:10:24   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
Unlawful imprisonments is a serious felony. These asshats have no arrest powers and yet they detained people they are not law enforcement officers and have not been deputized. They are simply thugs and vigilantes.


Every citizen has arrest powers!!!! It called a CITIZEN'S ARREST!

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:12:20   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
Since none of the people kidnaped and detained were either witnessed committing a felony or in the process of committing a felony there was no reason for a citizens arrest and it remains an actual felony for those who did so. Give it a bit of time and you will see some of these jokers locked up. If not by the feds by New Mexico law enforcement.


It is a felony to cross the border illegally!

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:14:38   #
JoyV
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
You obviously didn’t read the link I provided for you. I suggest you do. It also references misdemeanors, which crossing our border illegally is, but to reiterate, nobody is being “arrested”. And a “breach of the peace” could easily be articulated.

These brave citizens are knowledgeable in state and federal law. They are aware of where the line is not to be crossed. They’ll continue doing what they’re doing, and none will be locked up for doing so, your wishful thinking aside.


It use to be a misdemeanor in the Obama years. That was changed to a felony. And even before the change, anyone who had previously been deported and came back was committing a felony even in the Obama years.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 18:16:53   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Now of course you have direct knowledge that these immigrants were doing such I presume...


They weren't immigrants. Immigrants go through procedures and enter at a port of entry! Crossing between ports of entry is a felony.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.