One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Listen To Graham And A Dozen Republicans And Their Take On Obstruction, It's Real
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 22, 2019 15:52:41   #
JoyV
 
Mbhorad wrote:
trump uses subterfuge. He clouds our minds and controls our attentions with the SUPPOSE BOARDER WALL CRISIS while he gives his children government Jo's to keep them in close contact with him. They are close to receive his instructions to run trumps many international businesses for him. Imagine how we "the people" are ALLOWING his kids to travel abroad at our experience to do their family businesses with a coverup of doing USA business. All this done while keeping our attention to the DRAMA trump has constructed at the southern wall
trump uses subterfuge. He clouds our minds and con... (show quote)


The only ones manufacturing the border crisis are those who promise the i******s wealth and ease to come to America, and those who pay to bring them here. When CBP apprehends more than 100,000 i******s per month crossing our border between ports of entry; what else would you call it but a crisis!!!!

Travel expenses for his kids doing their sworn duty to our country doesn't come close to the travel expenses that Michelle used for her ski vacations and shopping trips abroad. Did you complain about those?

And Trump divested himself of the vast majority of his businesses before taking his oath of office.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 15:53:17   #
JoyV
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Yeah, and where exactly do the "Trump Children" travel to do Trump's dastardly business dealings?
Ivanka went to some schithole thatched roof hut country to erect a skyscraper?



Reply
Apr 29, 2019 15:02:41   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Did you v**e for clinton?


Bill? I did and I was among the first that said he needed to go. I don't apply sides or bias to actions, they either deserve impeachment or they don't, and it doesn't matter whether it's a dem or a republican.

Reply
 
 
Apr 29, 2019 15:17:36   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
woodguru wrote:
Bill? I did and I was among the first that said he needed to go. I don't apply sides or bias to actions, they either deserve impeachment or they don't, and it doesn't matter whether it's a dem or a republican.


Hmmmmm! You don't "apply bias" but you believe Trump deserves impeachment?

Reply
Apr 29, 2019 15:32:24   #
woodguru
 
padremike wrote:
What lie did Trump tell you believe is impeachable?


The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does it, and would serve for an obstruction indictment and prosecution as well.

Lying about no porn star affair, then no NDA, then not knowing about the payment on the NDA, then not knowing Cohen did it, then no campaign violations...

That is plenty, you can't try to impeach a president over lying about a blowjob and obstructing the investigation and not go after another president when what he did was worse.

The context I put this in is the outrage expressed by Lindsey Graham and a dozen other republicans over Clinton lying and impeachment being demanded to protect the integrity of the presidency. Look at it and you tell me how they get away from that if congress impeaches Trump?

Reply
Apr 29, 2019 17:20:04   #
Mikeyavelli
 
woodguru wrote:
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does it, and would serve for an obstruction indictment and prosecution as well.

Lying about no porn star affair, then no NDA, then not knowing about the payment on the NDA, then not knowing Cohen did it, then no campaign violations...

That is plenty, you can't try to impeach a president over lying about a blowjob and obstructing the investigation and not go after another president when what he did was worse.

The context I put this in is the outrage expressed by Lindsey Graham and a dozen other republicans over Clinton lying and impeachment being demanded to protect the integrity of the presidency. Look at it and you tell me how they get away from that if congress impeaches Trump?
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does ... (show quote)

He wasn't under oath, and your claims about his lying on those issues are hearsay at best, and wh**ever he did wasn't a crime in the first place.
Hilliar, on the other hand, lied under oath, lied to congress many times from her getting fired from the Watergate team all the way years later to Ghazi-Gh**e and Serverg@te and now about russian collusion.
Barr might be timid, but once his investigation of the c**p starts, hilliar and obama will be in trouble.

Reply
Apr 29, 2019 17:45:01   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
woodguru wrote:
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does it, and would serve for an obstruction indictment and prosecution as well.

Lying about no porn star affair, then no NDA, then not knowing about the payment on the NDA, then not knowing Cohen did it, then no campaign violations...

That is plenty, you can't try to impeach a president over lying about a blowjob and obstructing the investigation and not go after another president when what he did was worse.

The context I put this in is the outrage expressed by Lindsey Graham and a dozen other republicans over Clinton lying and impeachment being demanded to protect the integrity of the presidency. Look at it and you tell me how they get away from that if congress impeaches Trump?
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does ... (show quote)


There is no proof of any thing you claim. You prove to be the perfect Marxist progressive by judging those you h**e as guilty before holding even a mock trial. Why don't you contact Putin and see if he'll rent you a gulag for your political enemies.

Reply
 
 
Apr 29, 2019 20:55:12   #
JoyV
 
woodguru wrote:
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does it, and would serve for an obstruction indictment and prosecution as well.

Lying about no porn star affair, then no NDA, then not knowing about the payment on the NDA, then not knowing Cohen did it, then no campaign violations...

That is plenty, you can't try to impeach a president over lying about a blowjob and obstructing the investigation and not go after another president when what he did was worse.

The context I put this in is the outrage expressed by Lindsey Graham and a dozen other republicans over Clinton lying and impeachment being demanded to protect the integrity of the presidency. Look at it and you tell me how they get away from that if congress impeaches Trump?
The McGahn obstruction case Mueller laid out does ... (show quote)


You are assuming that the owner of hundreds of businesses who pays a lawyer on a monthly basis, would know every t***saction the lawyer makes instead of just paying his bill. Maybe he did and maybe he didn't. As for the nondisclosure agreement, he routinely required everyone he had intimacy with to sign one. In fact he had a standard nondisclosure agreement document.

Clinton was accused of rape. He not only stated he didn't commit rape under oath, he stated he never had sex under oath. AND the acts were while he was a sitting President. But even so, I thought impeachment was not called for.

Reply
May 22, 2019 22:56:26   #
AHO-C
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
I'm curious about some of the quotes in that report. Particularly the following by Senator Grassley: "It is clear to me that the president committed serious crimes when he coached his secretary, Betty Currie, and when he misled his aides Sidney Blumenthal and John Podesta … These actions weren’t just outrageous and morally wrong. They were also illegal. They were a direct assault on the integrity of the judicial process."

Sidney Blumenthal served as assistant and senior advisor to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001. Following the inauguration of GW, Blumenthal entered the private sector and wrote books about his service in Bubba's admin. In 2007, Blumenthal joined the Hillary Clinton p**********l campaign as a senior advisor. While on a trip to advise Clinton on her p**********l campaign, Blumenthal was arrested for driving while intoxicated in Nashua, New Hampshire, on January 7, 2008. He pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor DWI charge.

After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton wanted to hire Blumenthal. However, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked his se******n due to lingering anger among President Barack Obama's aides over Blumenthal's role in promoting negative stories about Obama during the Democratic primary. Blumenthal was a Clinton lackey through and through.

American political analysts characterized Blumenthal as "the most pro-Clinton writer on the planet." In Salon.com, Dwight Garner wrote that Blumenthal's pieces as Washington correspondent of The New Yorker "were so unabashedly pro-Clinton that they quickly became the butt of countless jokes."

John Podesta is an American political consultant who served as White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from October 20, 1998 until January 20, 2001 and as Counselor to President Barack Obama from January 1, 2014 until February 13, 2015. Before that he served as the White House Staff Secretary and White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations for the Clinton Administration between January 20, 1993 until October 20, 1998. John Podesta is the central figure in the leak of Hillary Clinton's emails.

In March 2016, the personal Gmail account of John Podesta, a former White House chief of staff and chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 U.S. p**********l campaign, was c*********d in a data breach, and some of his emails, many of which were work-related, were stolen. Cybersecurity researchers as well as the United States government attributed responsibility for the breach, which was accomplished via a spear-phishing attack, to the hacking group Fancy Bear, allegedly affiliated with Russian intelligence services.

Blumenthal and Podesta were rivals, they had their own feud trying to curry favor with Bill Clinton during his presidency and Hillary during her incredibly corrupt and dismal stint as SecState.

Neither of these two democrat hacks had a damn thing to do with Trump, his campaign or his presidency.

Ya find a glaring error like this in the pages of a foreign l*****t news service, it throws suspicion on the entire piece.
I'm curious about some of the quotes in that repor... (show quote)



Reply
May 22, 2019 22:59:04   #
AHO-C
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
He wasn't under oath, and your claims about his lying on those issues are hearsay at best, and wh**ever he did wasn't a crime in the first place.
Hilliar, on the other hand, lied under oath, lied to congress many times from her getting fired from the Watergate team all the way years later to Ghazi-Gh**e and Serverg@te and now about russian collusion.
Barr might be timid, but once his investigation of the c**p starts, hilliar and obama will be in trouble.



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.