One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mueller report: Barr proves himself just another Trump Lackey
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 19, 2019 11:28:42   #
rumitoid
 
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.

Reply
Apr 19, 2019 11:50:39   #
Kevyn
 
rumitoid wrote:
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was relea... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 19, 2019 12:04:05   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Someday, you're going to get the final revelation how utterly filthy and d********g you are. It's going to shock you.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2019 12:04:52   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was relea... (show quote)


Let impeachment proceedings begin!!

Bunch o damn drama queens...........

Reply
Apr 19, 2019 12:22:09   #
rumitoid
 
archie bunker wrote:
Let impeachment proceedings begin!!

Bunch o damn drama queens...........


Lies, corruption, obstruction just plain old p**********l business no one should fret about...if he is white and Republican.

Reply
Apr 19, 2019 12:40:44   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lies, corruption, obstruction just plain old p**********l business no one should fret about...if he is white and Republican.


Cry me a frigging river! This crap has gone on my whole life on both sides! Only now, it's 10 times worse since your God Queen lost.

I'm over it. You people are so full of rage, and h**e that you've completely lost touch with reality. Keep em coming Rumi. The rest of us have lives to live, and work to do to move this country forward.

Just keep leaning on your hoe, and let the weeds take over your garden. Our rows will be weed free someday.

Reply
Apr 19, 2019 12:49:39   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lies, corruption, obstruction just plain old p**********l business no one should fret about...if he is white and Republican.


The last president was black and he, and his "wingman" were far worse than Trump will ever be because, unlike Obama, Trump genuinely loves America and unlike Obama, Trump is color blind.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2019 12:54:16   #
2quick4u Loc: Somewhere in central Tx...
 
archie bunker wrote:
Let impeachment proceedings begin!!

Bunch o damn drama queens...........


Hey Archie..they've been in the drama biz a long time...

https://youtu.be/AGteQORlL4Q

Reply
Apr 19, 2019 13:11:24   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
2quick4u wrote:
Hey Archie..they've been in the drama biz a long time...

https://youtu.be/AGteQORlL4Q


That is hilarious! And too true!

Reply
Apr 20, 2019 08:14:24   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
rumitoid wrote:
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was relea... (show quote)


The cry of a butthurt Liberal. Pleasing to the eye, and uplifting for the soul.



Reply
Apr 20, 2019 12:58:20   #
Kazudy
 
[quote=rumitoid]Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.[/quote










Mueller is the Dems whackey lackey, including Comey

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2019 14:27:53   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
[quote=Kazudy][quote=rumitoid]Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.[/quote










Mueller is the Dems whackey lackey, including Comey[/quote]

"Termination of FBI Director Comey." Now, is this the very same Comey who, along with Loretta Lynch, decided to unilaterally rewrite 18 USC 798 and 1924, declining to prosecute Hillary Clinton for committing multiple felonies because "she meant no harm;" when there are people whose last name isn't Clinton sitting in prison at this moment for doing the very same thing on a much smaller scale?
That Comey?
The one who had knowledge of the falsified FISA warrants?
That Comey?

Reply
Apr 20, 2019 20:03:47   #
Kazudy
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lies, corruption, obstruction just plain old p**********l business no one should fret about...if he is white and Republican.


Collusion is NOT A CRIME and there was no collusion, thus not criminal. If there is no crime, how can there be obstruction? A black Democrat President was treated with kid gloves. Obama and Hillary are the criminals here, but the MSM is there to protect them with the help of Comey and the rest of the Democrat Mafia.

Reply
Apr 21, 2019 20:02:05   #
albets
 
rumitoid wrote:
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was released Thursday morning, Barr held a press conference for his second attempt to describe the fictional report he wishes Mueller's team had written. As if he had been hacked by Trump's Twitter feed, he repeated some version of the phrase "no collusion" over and over and over.

We soon learned that Mueller's report couldn't possibly clear Trump of "collusion." Why? It clearly states with the first few pages it does not even address the "concept of 'collusion.'" Did Barr not read the report or was he just bolstering Trump's base with what they wanted to hear.

Even before special counsel Robert Mueller's report was released, anyone who had a TV knew that President Donald Trump was too corrupt and c*********d for his office. Now we know the same is true for his attorney general, William Barr.

For weeks, Barr has been trying to sell us a Mueller report that simply does not exist.

The actual Mueller report, beneath all the redactions, details one of the most successful foreign disruptions of an American e******n in the history of the republic. It reveals a p**********l campaign eager to suck up the benefits of this "sweeping and systematic" interference, and it unmasks a president who attempted to commit multiple crimes to cover the whole thing up.

But beyond all those revelations, this process has shown we are in an emergency unlike anything we've seen since Watergate. Barr has proven that he is determined to help Trump get away with some of the most unpatriotic and corrupt acts ever committed by a president.

Barr also repeated the sentence fragment that played a starring role in his memo that attempted to exonerate the president: " … the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities."

Soon, the world finally saw the whole big shocking sentence:

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit e*******lly from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its e******n i**********e activities.

In other words, both sides were working toward the same goal. Mueller merely couldn't prove that they had coordinated their efforts in ways that specifically violated the law.

For instance, the famed "Trump Tower meeting," where the "Crown prosecutor of Russia ... offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton)," didn’t lead to any prosecutions. This isn't because it wasn't illegal. It's because "the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful."
Congress can apply obstruction laws to Trump

Barr also lied to the public when he stated in his press conference that Mueller did not "indicate" that he was leaving the question of obstruction of justice to the Congress.

The report lays out 10 instances of possible criminal obstruction ranging from "Termination of FBI Director Comey" to "The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen." It then explicitly says "we concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

The report then also reminded us why Congress has this power: "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

Checks and balances. Remember those? They come from something else Barr expects you to never read: The Constitution.
Minutes before Mueller's 448-page report was relea... (show quote)


very, very well written !! thank you rumitoid

Reply
Apr 21, 2019 20:34:28   #
emarine
 
Kazudy wrote:
Collusion is NOT A CRIME and there was no collusion, thus not criminal. If there is no crime, how can there be obstruction? A black Democrat President was treated with kid gloves. Obama and Hillary are the criminals here, but the MSM is there to protect them with the help of Comey and the rest of the Democrat Mafia.




Kaz buddy... you seem confused … Collusion is NOT A CRIME but obstruction of justice is... lets all see the report and cut the bs already... you trump diehards let trump & Fox think for you... inherently dangerous for a free society ...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.