despotism at its worst.
The whole point of the Mueller report is to crash this fantasy amplified in the media of collusion.
Now they use the Mueller report to pick out bits to chew over.
if this had happened we might be looking at...
You're missing the big picture i***t.
if anybody has burnished his journalistic luster bashing all the negatives of Trump its Chris Wallace.
So how come no one in the media is revisiting all the false crap they reported? I
I want to look at what reporters have written in the last two Years and have the press wash their mouth out with soap.
tommsteyer wrote:
despotism at its worst.
The whole point of the Mueller report is to crash this fantasy amplified in the media of collusion.
Now they use the Mueller report to pick out bits to chew over.
if this had happened we might be looking at...
You're missing the big picture i***t.
if anybody has burnished his journalistic luster bashing all the negatives of Trump its Chris Wallace.
So how come no one in the media is revisiting all the false crap they reported? I
I want to look at what reporters have written in the last two Years and have the press wash their mouth out with soap.
despotism at its worst. br The whole point of the ... (
show quote)
Obviously we don't understand Freedom of the Press! I'm beginning to understand the Press believes it's freedom has now morphed to mean they are supposed to be free from criticism. If the MSM were to ever admit their intentional biased opinion to create a c**p and unseat Trump they will lose all future credibility.
Chris Wallace and Shepherd Smith are two of a kind. Both too snarky voicing their own personal opinion. Both don't like Trump.
but Wallace talk specious rubbish. All the Mueller report and wallace comes with hypothetical if... if.. constructions.
if mike Wallace had used birth control the year of Chris Wallace' birth, " what we would be looking at" would be a decent reporter focused on unbiased reporting.
stop talking what if, and start talking what is.
Otherwise find a reporter from 50 states of newspapers and blogs who will poke their nose into Obama involvement, Clapper press obfuscation, Comedy rope a doping.
I get the feeling that Comedy threw His under the bus becoz she would have fired him asap.
He pressed his conference in the time period right up to the v**e causing just enough pie in the eye that His v**ers stayed home or clicked the other box in disgust.
At least Gore was gracious.
so Comey wanted to set up Trump and Trump sussed him out.
tommsteyer wrote:
but Wallace talk specious rubbish. All the Mueller report and wallace comes with hypothetical if... if.. constructions.
if mike Wallace had used birth control the year of Chris Wallace' birth, " what we would be looking at" would be a decent reporter focused on unbiased reporting.
stop talking what if, and start talking what is.
Otherwise find a reporter from 50 states of newspapers and blogs who will poke their nose into Obama involvement, Clapper press obfuscation, Comedy rope a doping.
I get the feeling that Comedy threw His under the bus becoz she would have fired him asap.
He pressed his conference in the time period right up to the v**e causing just enough pie in the eye that His v**ers stayed home or clicked the other box in disgust.
At least Gore was gracious.
so Comey wanted to set up Trump and Trump sussed him out.
but Wallace talk specious rubbish. All the Muelle... (
show quote)
"What if v. What is." I like that analogy. Great observation.
Hm, just sayin', I can't think of anybody who likes Chrissy.
An SNL satire waiting to happen.
Cavuto too with all the false fogeyisms.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.