One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Chuck Schumer and the Anti-Infanticide Bill
Apr 17, 2019 19:27:20   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy
April 17, 2019
38

A******n has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term a******ns, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched a******n, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive A******n Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an a******n are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among v**ers.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term a******ns up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a v**e.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and v**e, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched a******n.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the k*****g of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term a******ns and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 19:38:46   #
Liberty Tree
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy
April 17, 2019
38

A******n has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term a******ns, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched a******n, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive A******n Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an a******n are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among v**ers.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term a******ns up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a v**e.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and v**e, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched a******n.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the k*****g of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term a******ns and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-In... (show quote)


A******n is one of the sacrements of the Democrat's religion of secular humanism.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 21:01:36   #
Seth
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy
April 17, 2019
38

A******n has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term a******ns, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched a******n, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive A******n Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an a******n are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among v**ers.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term a******ns up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a v**e.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and v**e, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched a******n.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the k*****g of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term a******ns and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-In... (show quote)


I don't know if such an executive order, as desirable as it would be, would be within the authority of the Executive Branch. It might only result in some l*****t judge "overruling" it -- I think President Trump needs to take it straight to SCOTUS, where a final word up front would prevent a Ninth Circus type fiasco from making cold blooded murder into the subject of lengthy deliberation.

That one of our two major political parties should even consider allowing this monstrous crap to go on is an embarrassment to me as an American, and Democrat v**ers who call themselves Americans should feel the same way.

What the Democratic Party is trying to do to this country defies any even halfway sane description, and anyone who feels any different should be taken out and slowly smothered to death on national television.

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2019 21:21:10   #
badbob85037
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy
April 17, 2019
38

A******n has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term a******ns, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched a******n, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive A******n Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an a******n are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among v**ers.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term a******ns up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a v**e.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and v**e, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched a******n.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the k*****g of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term a******ns and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-In... (show quote)


My daughter was told by doctors to abort her second child because of her health. She said no and she delivered me another grandson.

When obama was a state senator a bill came to the floor that would stop allowing aborted babies born alive from receiving water, food, or medical treatment and be left to die in a dumpster, a waste paper basket, or thrown on a Plan Parenthood roof top. Twice he v**ed to continue the k*****g and a third time he was able to k**l the bill before it reached the floor. When a bill with the same wording reached the Federal level not one person of all parties v**ed to allow the murdering of the most innocent and helpless of us all.

Look how obama has changed the minds of the mindless party. It doesn't take a religious man to know what evil looks like . Obam and his party of 'if it feels good murder it'. To bad he didn't apply that stance to anyone who could punch back. How long before they pass a******n up to 5 years old?

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 22:27:29   #
teabag09
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy
April 17, 2019
38

A******n has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term a******ns, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched a******n, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive A******n Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an a******n are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among v**ers.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term a******ns up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a v**e.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and v**e, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched a******n.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the k*****g of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term a******ns and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?
Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-In... (show quote)


I'm not sure whether the President should execute an executive order right now but should put this to the people during his rallies and hammer the demoncrats with it. Let the people decide and if the demons do capitulate the use an executive order and declare any actions against the order will be prosecuted to the highest degree. Of course the demons will run to the 9th circuit and try to overturn the order. I believe that's when the people will raise hell. Mike

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 12:56:53   #
Carlos
 
I thought there was a law already on the books against murder, if a child is alive and you k**l it then isn't that murder? I guess some democrats are actually murderers, What else can you call it. A human is
Alive, then You k**l him or her, what else could it be called. I really dont understand why there's
Even a discussion about it. If I went out and k**led a baby after the a******n was screwed up (which maybe they are on purpose) wouldn't I be arrested? Someone has to explain this to me because I truly don't
Get it. If you can k**l a baby that's alive then Why is it Murder to k**l anyone at all? Probably the
Biggest question is.... How are they getting away with it. I can't do it, why should anyone else be able
To do it. We all know that democrats are a little nasty, but murder? Of little babies? If you saw that in China
You'd get all upset about it, although now that I think of it the democrats have a lot of friends In China.
Look at Feinstein, her and her Chinese spies then there's Bidens kids. So maybe it doesn't bother
Certain democrats about k*****g children. The fanatical left, unbelievable.




What fools these mortals be

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 17:28:52   #
teabag09
 
Carlos wrote:
I thought there was a law already on the books against murder, if a child is alive and you k**l it then isn't that murder? I guess some democrats are actually murderers, What else can you call it. A human is
Alive, then You k**l him or her, what else could it be called. I really dont understand why there's
Even a discussion about it. If I went out and k**led a baby after the a******n was screwed up (which maybe they are on purpose) wouldn't I be arrested? Someone has to explain this to me because I truly don't
Get it. If you can k**l a baby that's alive then Why is it Murder to k**l anyone at all? Probably the
Biggest question is.... How are they getting away with it. I can't do it, why should anyone else be able
To do it. We all know that democrats are a little nasty, but murder? Of little babies? If you saw that in China
You'd get all upset about it, although now that I think of it the democrats have a lot of friends In China.
Look at Feinstein, her and her Chinese spies then there's Bidens kids. So maybe it doesn't bother
Certain democrats about k*****g children. The fanatical left, unbelievable.




What fools these mortals be
I thought there was a law already on the books aga... (show quote)


Carlos, if you would please use the QUOTE REPLY tab so we'll know who and what you are replying to. Thanks. Mike

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.